References
- Ali, J. 2010. Manuscript rejection: Causes and remedies. Journal of Young Pharmacists 2 (1):3–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.62205.
- Barroga, E., and H. Mitoma. 2019. Improving scientific writing skills and publishing capacity by developing university-based editing system and writing programs. Journal of Medical Science 34 (1):e9. doi:https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e9.
- Bredan, A. 2013. Science and society: Inheritance of poor writing habits. EMBO Reports 14 (7):593–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2013.76.
- Cavanagh, S. 1997. Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher 4 (3):5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2.
- Clark, C., and B. Sullivan. 2014. Evaluating the NIH library editing service: Pilot study used to analyze service impact. Science & Technology Libraries 33 (4):351–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2014.950000.
- Crystal, D. 2003. English as a global language. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Cummings, P., and F. Rivara. 2002. Responding to reviewers’ comments on submitted articles. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 156:105–07. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.156.2.105.
- Dayton, D. 1998. Technical editing online: The quest for transparent technology. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 28 (1):3–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/5EM1-R1TN-MMN3-3Y6M.
- Drubin, D., and D. Kellogg. 2012. English as the universal language of science: Opportunities and challenges. Molecular Biology of the Cell 23:1399. [Editorial]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e12-02-0108.
- Elsevier.com. 2020. Understanding the publishing process: How to publish in scholarly journals. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/99382/U_Pub_Process_brochure_web_042115.pdf.
- Gordon, M. 1984. How authors select journals: A test of the reward maximization model of submission behaviour. Social Studies of Science 14 (1):27–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014001003.
- Gump, S. 2014. Recovering the covering letter: Submitting manuscripts to scholarly journals in the twenty-first century. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 45 (2):172–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.45.2.004.
- Henshall, A. 2018. English language policies in scientific journals: Signs of change in the field of economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36:26–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.08.001.
- Hing, C., D. Higgs, L. Hooper, S. Donell, and F. Song. 2011. A survey of orthopaedic journal editors determining the criteria of manuscript selection for publication. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 6 (19). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-19.
- Jirge, P. 2017. Preparing and publishing a scientific manuscript. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 10 (1):3–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_36_17.
- Kaplan, R., and R. Baldauf. 2005. Editing contributed scholarly articles from a language management perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (1):47–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.01.001.
- Lim, J., V. Topping, J. Lee, K. Bailey, S. Kim, and T. Kim. 2019. Effects of providing manuscript editing through a combination of in-house and external editing services in an academic hospital. PloS One 14 (7):e0219567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219567.
- Lock, S. 1985. A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine. London: Nuffield Provincials Hospital Trust.
- Lozano, G. 2014. Ethics of using language editing services in an era of digital communication and heavily multi-authored papers. Science and Engineering Ethics 20:363–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9451-6.
- Luiselli, J. 2010. Writing for publication: A performance enhancement guide for the human services professional. Behavior Modification 34 (5):459–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445510383529.
- Malički, M., I. Aalbersberg, L. Bouter, and G. Riet. 2019. Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines. PLoS ONE 14 (9):e0222157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222157.
- Mudrak, B. 2013. Understanding the needs of international authors. Learned Publishing 26 (2):139–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1087/20130212.
- Noble, W. 2017. Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers. PLoS Computational Biology 13 (10):e1005730. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005730.
- Pagel, W. F., Kendall, and H. Gibbs. 2002. Self-identified publishing needs of nonnative English-speaking faculty and fellows at an academic medical institution. Science Editor 25 (4):111–14.
- Paiva, C., R. Araujo, B. Paiva., C. Souza., F. Cárcano., M. Costa., S. Serrano., and J. Lima. 2017. What are the personal and professional characteristics that distinguish the researchers who publish in high- and low-impact journals?: A multi-national web-based survey. Ecancermedicalscience 11 (718):1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.718.
- Ridpath, J., and S. Greene. 2012. PS1-63: PRISM online training: A free, customized, effective plain language tutorial for researchers. [Selected Abstract.]. Clinical Medicine & Research 10 (3):169. doi:https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2012.1100.ps1-63.
- Sandesh, N., and S. Wahrekar. 2017. Choosing the scientific journal for publishing research work: Perceptions of medical and dental researchers. Clujul Medical 90 (2):196–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-704.
- Sengupta, S., S. Dhananjay, R. Pradeep, N. Sundaram, and B. Jyotirmay. 2014. Publish or perish: The art of scientific writing. Indian Journal of Ophthalmol 62 (11):1089–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.146760.
- Shamseer, L. S., Hopewell, D. Altman, D. Moher, and K. Schulz. 2016. Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: A survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014. Trials 17 (1):301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1408-z.
- Stephens, P., and J. Campbell. 1995. Scientific writing and editing: A new role for the library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 83 (4):478–82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8547910/.
- Szklo, M. 2006. Quality of scientific articles. Revista De Saúde Pública 40:30–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006000400005.
- Testa, J. 2008. The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. Contributions in Science 4 (1):69–73. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Contributions/article/view/256484.