Analyzing Citations to Software by Research Area: A Case Study of MATLAB

References

• Báez-López, J. M. D., and D. A. Báez-Villegas. 2019. MATLAB handbook with applications to mathematics, science, engineering, and finance. Boca Ratón, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Börner, K., C. Chen, and K. W. Boyack. 2003. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37 (1):179–255. doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. 2020a. Web of science core collection help – Cited reference search. https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_crsearch1.html (Accessed March 16, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. 2020b. Web of science core collection help – Keywords. https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_full_record.html (Accessed March 16, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. 2020c. Web of science core collection help – Research areas (categories/classification). https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca.html (accessed March 16, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. 2022a. Web of Science. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/ (Accessed March 16, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. 2022b. Web of science journal evaluation process and selection criteria. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/journal-evaluation-process-and-selection-criteria/ (Accessed March 16, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cobo, M. J., A. G. López‐Herrera, E. Herrera‐Viedma, and F. Herrera. 2011. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (7):1382–402. doi:10.1002/asi.21525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, S. 2011. Informing collection development through citation examination of the civil engineering research literature. In: ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 22.876.1–22.876.15. Vancouver, BC. Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1964. Science citation index – A new dimension in indexing. Science 144 (3619):649–54. doi:10.1126/science.144.3619.649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1972. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178 (4060):471–79. doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1990. KeyWords Plus – ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. 1. Expanding your searching power on current-contents on diskette. Current Contents 32:5–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E., I. H. Sher, and R. J. Torpie. 1964. The use of citation data in writing the history of science. No. AD0466578.Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information.
   Google Scholar
• Gil‐Leiva, I., and A. Alonso‐Arroyo. 2007. Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (8):1175–87. doi:10.1002/asi.20595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., and R. N. Kostoff. 2003. How useful are ‘key words’ in scientific journals? Journal of Information Science 29 (5):433–38. doi:10.1177/01655515030295008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Q. 1999. Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends 48 (1):133–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howison, J., and J. Bullard. 2016. Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (9):2137–55. doi:10.1002/asi.23538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajikawa, Y., O. Saito, and K. Takeuchi. 2017. Academic landscape of 10 years of sustainability science. Sustainability Science 12 (6):869–73. doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0477-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D. S., and N. P. Chue Hong. 2018. Software citation in theory and practice. In Mathematical Software – ICMS 2018, Lecture notes in computer science, ed. J. H. Davenport, M. Kauers, G. Labahn, and J. Urban, 289–96. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. L., G. Ding, N. Feng, M. H. Wang, and Y. S. Ho. 2009. Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics 80 (1):39–58. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K., E. Yan, and Y. Feng. 2017. How is R cited in research outputs? Structure, impacts, and citation standard. Journal of Informetrics 11 (4):989–1002. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Y. Yin, W. Liu, and M. Dunford. 2015. Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 103 (1):135–58. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MathWorks. 2022a. MATLAB. https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html (Accessed March 16, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• MathWorks. 2022b. Products and services. https://www.mathworks.com/products.html (Accessed March 16, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• MathWorks. 2022c. Feature stories. https://www.mathworks.com/company/mathworks-stories.html (Accessed March 16, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, J. T., L. Lennertz, and Z. A. Mojica. 2021. Mapping a discipline: A guide to using VOSviewer for bibliometric and visual analysis. Science & Technology Libraries 1–30. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547.
   Google Scholar
• Michałowski, T., ed. 2011. Application of MATLAB in science and engineering. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech.
   Google Scholar
• Moler, C., and J. Little. 2020. A history of MATLAB. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages 4 (HOPL):1–67. doi:10.1145/3386331.
   Google Scholar
• Moral-Muñoz, J. A., E. Herrera-Viedma, A. Santisteban-Espejo, and M. J. Cobo. 2020. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Profesional de la Información 29 (1):1–20. doi:10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musser, L. 2007. A study of references in mining engineering publications. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 49. doi:10.5062/F4RJ4GCP.
   Google Scholar
• Musser, L. R., and T. W. Conkling. 1996. Characteristics of engineering citations. Science & Technology Libraries 15 (4):41–49. doi:10.1300/J122v15n04_04.
   Google Scholar
• Nangia, U., and D. S. Katz. 2017. Understanding software in research: Initial results from examining Nature and a call for collaboration. In 2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on e‐Science (e‐Science), 486–87. doi:10.1109/eScience.2017.78.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, K. E., A. M. Smith, and D. S. Katz. 2016. The challenge and promise of software citation for credit, identification, discovery, and reuse. Journal of Data and Information Quality 7 (4):16. doi:10.1145/2968452.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, X., E. Yan, and W. Hua. 2016. Disciplinary differences of software use and impact in scientific literature. Scientometrics 109 (3):1593–610. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2138-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Real, J. L., B. J. Nievas-Soriano, and J. Uribe-Toril. 2020. Has COVID-19 gone viral? An overview of research by subject area. Health Education & Behavior 47 (6):861–69. doi:10.1177/1090198120958368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiraglia, R. P. 2015. Keywords redux – An editorial. Knowledge Organization 42 (1):4–8. doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2015-1-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., D. E. Hubbard, C. Pickett, and R. Kimball. 2013. Citation behavior of aerospace engineering faculty. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 39 (6):451–57. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, R. 2018. A comparative study of citations to chemical encyclopedias in scholarly articles: Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology and Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Scientometrics 117 (1):175–89. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2844-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, R. 2022. Unpublished raw data on citations to MATLAB. California State University, Fullerton.
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 (2):523–38. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2022. VOSviewer manual. Version 1.6.18. Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Leiden, NL: Leiden University. http://www.vosviewer.com/getting-started#VOSviewer%20manual
   Google Scholar
• Waaijer, C. J., and M. Palmblad. 2015. Bibliometric mapping: Eight decades of analytical chemistry, with special focus on the use of mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 87 (9):4588–96. doi:10.1021/ac5040314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, S., J. Zhang, and Y. S. Ho. 2008. Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 77 (1):113–30. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1928-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y. S., H. Zo, M. Choi, D. Lee, and H. W. Lee. 2018. Exploring the dynamic knowledge structure of studies on the internet of things: Keyword analysis. ETRI Journal 40 (6):745–58. doi:10.4218/etrij.2018-0059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, B. 2014. What do engineering researchers cite? A citation analysis study of sixteen engineering journals. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 75. doi:10.5062/F44Q7RXF.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. 2018. Analyzing citation and research collaboration characteristics of faculty in aerospace, civil and environmental, electrical and computer, and mechanical engineering. College & Research Libraries 79 (2):158–78. doi:10.5860/crl.79.2.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Q. Yu, F. Zheng, C. Long, Z. Lu, and Z. Duan. 2016. Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (4):967–72. doi:10.1002/asi.23437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar