Altmetric Attention Score and Its Relationships to the Characteristics of the Publications in the Journal of the American Chemical Society

References

• Altmetric. 2022. What are altmetrics? Accessed May 23. https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/
   Google Scholar
• American Chemical Society. 2022. About the journal. Accessed May 4. https://pubs.acs.org/page/jacsat/about.html.
   Google Scholar
• Annalingam, A., H. Damayanthi, R. Jayawardena, and P. Ranasinghe. 2014. Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. SpringerPlus 3 (1):140. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antoniou, G. A., S. A. Antoniou, E. I. Georgakarakos, G. S. Sfyroeras, and G. S. Georgiadis. 2015. Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. Annals of Vascular Surgery 29 (2):286–92. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baheti, A. D., and P. Bhargava. 2017. Altmetrics: A measure of social attention toward scientific research. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 46 (6):391–92. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., H. Schier, W. Marx, and H.-D. Daniel. 2012. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics 6 (1):11–18. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and R. Williams. 2013. How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Journal of Informetrics 7 (2):562–74. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and W. Marx. 2014. How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons. Scientometrics 98 (1):211–19. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1020-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., L. Leydesdorff, and J. Wang. 2014. How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date? Journal of Informetrics 8 (1):175–80. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, T., S. Harnad, and L. Carr. 2006. Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (8):1060–72. doi:10.1002/asi.20373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarivate. 2022. Journal citation reports. Accessed 5 April 2022. https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr/home
   Google Scholar
• CrossRef. 2021. “Cited-by.” Last Modified February 9, accessed 5 April 2022. https://www.crossref.org/services/cited-by/
   Google Scholar
• de Araújo, C. G. S., B. R. R. de Oliveira, L. V. de Oliveira Brito, T. T. da Matta, B. Ferreira Viana, C. P. de Souza, R. de Carvalho Guerreiro, F. Antonio Slama, and E. Da matta mello Portugal. 2012. Two-year citations of JAPPL original articles: Evidence of a relative age effect. Journal of Applied Physiology 112 (9):1434–36. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01491.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F. 2015. The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles. Scientometrics 102 (2):1773–79. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1445-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., X. Dong, Y. Bu, B. Zhang, K. Lin, and H. Beibei. 2021. Revisiting the relationship between downloads and citations: A perspective from papers with different citation patterns in the case of the Lancet. Scientometrics 126 (9):7609–21. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04099-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, N. A., H. Ebrahimian, M. Maryam, and T. Farzad. 2015. Does a long reference list guarantee more citations? Analysis of Malaysian highly cited and review papers. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration 1 (3):6–16. doi:10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.13.1001.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, H. 2017. A theoretical model of scientific impact based on citations. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 20 (3). Retrieved from https://adum.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/1771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farshad, M., C. Sidler, and C. Gerber. 2013. Association of scientific and nonscientific factors to citation rates of articles of renowned orthopedic journals. European Orthopaedics and Traumatology 4 (3):125–30. doi:10.1007/s12570-013-0174-6.
   Google Scholar
• Figueredo, E. 2006. The numerical equivalence between the impact factor of journals and the quality of the articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (11):1561–1561. doi:10.1002/asi.20418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. W., C. E. Timothy Paine, and B. Sauterey. 2016. Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals. Ecology and Evolution 6 (21):7717–26. doi:10.1002/ece3.2505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1972. Citation Analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178 (4060):471–79. doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, P., and T. Gurney. 2010. Studying scientific discourse on the web using bibliometrics: A chemistry blogging case study. Web Science Conference 2010, Raleigh, NC, April 26-27, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Haustein, S., I. Peters, C. R. Sugimoto, M. Thelwall, and V. Larivière. 2014. Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (4):656–69. doi:10.1002/asi.23101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haustein, S., R. Costas, and V. Larivière. 2015. Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLOS ONE 10 (3):e0120495. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, K. N., E. M. Polce, A. Vadhera, B. T. Williams, B. U. Nwachukwu, S. J. Nho, and J. Chahla. 2020. What is the predictive ability and academic impact of the altmetrics score and social media attention? The American Journal of Sports Medicine 48 (5):1056–62. doi:10.1177/0363546520903703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawani, S. M. 1986. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics 9 (1):13–25. doi:10.1007/BF02016604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwowar, H. 2013. Value all research products. Nature 493 (7431):159–159. doi:10.1038/493159a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkrantz, A. B., A. Ayoola, K. Singh, and R. Duszak. 2017. Alternative metrics (“Altmetrics”) for assessing article impact in popular general radiology journals. Academic Radiology 24 (7):891–97. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, R., and P. Mahajan. 2022. Altmetrics and their relationship with citation counts: A case of journal articles in physics. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). doi:10.1108/GKMC-07-2021-0122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudah, S., R. D. Faccone, M. H. Nasra, D. Constantinescu, M. E. Menendez, and A. Nicholson. 2022. Twitter mentions influence academic citation count of shoulder and elbow surgery publications. Cureus 14 (1):e21762. doi:10.7759/cureus.21762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahamtan, I., A. Safipour Afshar, and K. Ahamdzadeh. 2016. Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics 107 (3):1195–225. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, H. R., N. Raison, and P. Dasgupta. 2017. The rise of Altmetrics. JAMA 317 (2):131–32. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.18346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. B. 2009. Comparing citations and downloads for individual articles at the journal of vision. Journal of Vision 9 (4):i–i. doi:10.1167/9.4.i.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. 2022. What counts: Making sense of metrics of research value. Science and Public Policy scac004. doi:10.1093/scipol/scac004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar