568
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Validation and Reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for Brazilian Infants

, &
Pages 470-485 | Received 09 Jul 2019, Accepted 29 Dec 2019, Published online: 13 Jan 2020

References

  • Barbosa, V. M., Campbell, S. K., & Berbaum, M. (2007). Discriminating infants from different developmental outcome groups using the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) item responses. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 19(1), 28–39. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e31802f65f9
  • Barbosa, V. M., Campbell, S. K., Smith, E., & Berbaum, M. (2005). Comparison of Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) item responses among children with cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and typical development. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(4), 446–456. doi:10.5014/ajot.59.4.446
  • Botelho, A. C. G., Neri, L. V., Silva, M. Q. F. d., Lima, T. T. d., Santos, K. G. d., Cunha, R. M. A. d., … Lima, M. R. d O. (2016). Presumed congenital infection by Zika virus: Findings on psychomotor development—A case report. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 16(suppl 1), 39–44. doi:10.1590/1806-9304201600s100004
  • Breakwell, G. M., Hammond, S., Fife-Schaw, C., & Smith, J. A. (2006). Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Byrne, R., Noritz, G., & Maitre, N. (2017). Implementation of early diagnosis and intervention guidelines for cerebral palsy in a high-risk infant follow-up clinic. Pediatric Neurology, 76, 66–71. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.08.002
  • Campbell, S. (1999). Test-retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 11(2), 60–66. doi:10.1097/00001577-199901120-00002
  • Campbell, S. (2012). The test of infant motor performance—Test user’s manual version 3.0 for the TIMP version 5. Chicago, IL: Chicago Infant Motor Performances Scales, LLC.
  • Campbell, S. K., & Hedeker, D. (2001). Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome. The Journal of Pediatrics, 139(4), 546–551. doi:10.1067/mpd.2001.117581
  • Campbell, S. K., & Kolobe, T. H. A. (2000). Concurrent validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 12(1), 2–9. doi:10.1097/00001577-200001210-00002
  • Campbell, S., Kolobe, T., Osten, E., Lenke, M., & Girolami, G. (1995). Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance. Physical Therapy, 75(7), 585–596. doi:10.1093/ptj/75.7.585
  • Campbell, S. K., Kolobe, T. H., Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (2002). Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 44(4), 263. doi:10.1017/S0012162201002043
  • Campbell, S. K., Levy, P., Zawacki, L., & Liao, P.J. (2006). Population-based age standards for interpreting results on the test of motor infant performance. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 18(2), 119–125. doi:10.1097/01.pep.0000223108.03305.5d
  • Campbell, S., Wright, B., & Linacre, J. (2002). Development of a functional movement scale for infants. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(2), 190–204.
  • Campbell, S. K., Zawacki, L., Rankin, K. M., Yoder, J. C., Shapiro, N., Li, Z., & White-Traut, R. (2013). Concurrent validity of the TIMP and the Bayley III scales at 6 weeks corrected age. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 25(4), 395–401. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e31829db85b
  • Cardoso, A.C. N., Campos, A.C., Santos, M.M., Santos, D. C. C., & Rocha, N. A. C. F. (2015). Motor performance of children with Down syndrome and typical development at 2 to 4 and 26 months. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 27(2), 135–141. doi:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000120
  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
  • Cicchetti, D., & Rourke, B. (2004). Methodological and biostatistical foundations of clinical neuropsychology and medical and health disciplines (2nd ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Coelho, R., Ferreira, J. P., Sukiennik, R., & Halpern, R. (2016). Child development in primary care: A surveillance proposal. Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português), 92(5), 505–511. doi:10.1016/j.jpedp.2016.05.016
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Coker-Bolt, P., Woodbury, M. L., Perkel, J., Moreau, N. G., Hope, K., Brown, T., … Jenkins, D. (2014). Identifying premature infants at high and low risk for motor delays using motor performance testing and MRS. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(3), 219–232. doi:10.3233/PRM-140291
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1976). Construct validity in psychological tests. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Flegel, J., & Kolobe, T. H. A. (2002). Predictive validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance as measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency at school age. Physical Therapy, 82(8), 762–771. doi:10.1093/ptj/82.8.762
  • Furr, R. M. (2018). Psychometrics: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • George, J. M., Boyd, R. N., Colditz, P. B., Rose, S. E., Pannek, K., Fripp, J., … Bandaranayake, S. E. (2015). PPREMO: A prospective cohort study of preterm infant brain structure and function to predict neurodevelopmental outcome. BMC Pediatrics, 15(1), 123. doi:10.1186/s12887-015-0439-z
  • Golineleo, M. T. B., Barbosa, V. M., & Martins, P. (2008). Versão Portuguesa do Teste daPerformance Motora de Bebês (TIMP) Versão 5.1. Chicago, IL: Chicago Infant Motor Performances Scales, LLC. Retrieved from https://thetimp.com/products-for-therapists#!/TIMP-Portuguese/p/56137938/category=0
  • Gwet, K. L. (2008). Variance estimation of nominal-scale inter-rater reliability with random selection of raters. Psychometrika, 73(3), 407–430. doi:10.1007/s11336-007-9054-8
  • Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  • Lee, E.J., Han, J.T., & Lee, J.H. (2012). Risk factors affecting Tests of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in pre-term infants at post-conceptional age of 40 weeks. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(2), 79–83. doi:10.3109/17518423.2011.633571
  • Lekskulchai, R., & Cole, J. (2001). Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47(3), 169–176. doi:10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60264-6
  • Majnemer, A., & Snider, L. (2005). A comparison of developmental assessments of the newborn and young infant. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11(1), 68–73. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20052
  • Murney, M. E., & Campbell, S. K. (1998). The ecological relevance of the Test of Infant Motor Performance elicited scale items. Physical Therapy, 78(5), 479–489. doi:10.1093/ptj/78.5.479
  • Nuysink, J., Van Haastert, I. C., Eijsermans, M. J. C., Koopman-Esseboom, C., Helders, P. J. M., de Vries, L. S., & van der Net, J. (2013). Prediction of gross motor development and independent walking in infants born very preterm using the Test of Infant Motor Performance and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Early Human Development, 89(9), 693–697. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.04.016
  • Oberg, G. K., Campbell, S. K., Girolami, G. L., Ustad, T., Jørgensen, L., Kaaresen, P. I., & Kaaresen, P. I. (2012). Study protocol: An early intervention program to improve motor outcome in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial and a qualitative study of physiotherapy performance and parental experiences. BMC Pediatrics, 12(1), 15. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-15
  • Piper, M. C. M., Darrah, J., Maguire, T., & Redfern, L. (1994). Motor assessment of the developing infant (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
  • Saccani, R., & Valentini, N. C. (2011). Reference curves for the Brazilian Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Percentiles for clinical description and follow-up over time. Jornal de Pediatria, 88(1), 40–47. doi:10.2223/JPED.2142
  • Saccani, R., Valentini, N., & Pereira, K. (2016). New Brazilian developmental curves and reference values for the Alberta infant motor scale. Infant Behavior and Development, 45, 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.09.002
  • Santos, V., Formiga, C., Mello, P., Leone, C., Santos, V. M., Formiga, C. K. M. R., … Leone, C. R. (2017). Late preterm infants’ motor development until term age. Clinics, 72(1), 17–22. doi:10.6061/clinics/2017(01)04
  • Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
  • Snider, L., Majnemer, A., Mazer, B., Campbell, S., & Bos, A. F. (2009). Prediction of motor and functional outcomes in infants born preterm assessed at term. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 21(1), 2–11. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181957bdc
  • Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D.M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A.W.M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., … de Vet, H. C.W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  • Ulloa, M. E. (2017). Adaptación transcultural y versión española de la prueba de rendimiento motor infantil (TIMP) (Universidad Complutense de Madrid).
  • Ustad, T., Evensen, K. A. I., Campbell, S. K., Girolami, G. L., Helbostad, J., Jørgensen, L., … Øberg, G. K. (2016). Early parent-administered physical therapy for preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20160271. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-0271
  • Valentini, N. C., & Saccani, R. (2012). Brazilian validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Physical Therapy, 92(3), 440–447. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110036
  • Walters, S. J. (2009). Quality of life outcomes in clinical trials and health-care evaluation: A practical guide to analysis and interpretation. New York: Wiley.
  • Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.