Reliability and Responsiveness of the Observable Movement Quality Scale for Children with Mild to Moderate Motor Impairments

References

• Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 1(8476), 307–310. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2868172doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, W. F., Gowland, C., Hardy, S., Rosenbaum, P. L., Lane, M., Plews, N., … Russell, D. J. (1991). Development of a quality-of-movement measure for children with cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy, 71(11), 820–828. doi:10.1093/ptj/71.11.820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1977). Stastical power analysis for the behavioural scienses. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R. (2003). Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(5), 395–407. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00044-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet, H. C. W., Foumani, M., Scholten, M. A., Jacobs, W. C. H., Stiggelbout, A. M., Knol, D. L., & Peul, W. C. (2015). Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(5), 518–524. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet, H. C. W., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Terwee, C. B., van der Roer, N., Knol, D. L., Beckerman, H., … Bouter, L. M. (2007). Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 131–142. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-9109-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Ostelo, R. W., Beckerman, H., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: Distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(1), 3–7. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dekkers, L. M. A., Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden, M. W. G., Jonker, M., De Swart, B. J. M., & Janssen, A. J. W. M. (2018). Interrater reliability of the observable movement quality scale for children. Physiotherapy Canada, 70(2), 113–119. doi:10.3138/ptc.2016-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteao, C., Law, M., Russell, D., Pollock, N., Rosenbaum, P., & Walter, S. (1993). The relialbilty and validity of the quality of upper extremity skills test. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13(2), 1–18. doi:10.1080/J006v13n02_01
   Google Scholar
• Demoulin, C., Ostelo, R., Knottnerus, J. A., & Smeets, R. J. E. M. (2010). What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire? European Journal of Pain, 14(2), 200–206. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøvle, L., Haugen, A. J., Hasvik, E., Natvig, B., Brox, J. I., & Grotle, M. (2014). Patients’ ratings of global perceived change during 2 years were strongly influenced by the current health status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(5), 508–515. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadders-Algra, M. (2004). General movements: A window for early identification of children at high risk for developmental disorders. Journal of Pediatrics, 145(2 SUPPL), 12–18. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.05.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. R., & Heriza, C. B. (1987). Measuring infant movement. Clinical and technological assessment techniques. Physical Therapy, 67(12), 1877–1880. 10.1097/01241398-198807000-00065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker, E., Baer, G. D., Stark, C., Herkenrath, P., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2016). Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Infant Motor Profile in 3- to 18-months-old infants. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 28(2), 217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heineman, K. R., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2008). Evaluation of neuromotor function in infancy- A systematic review of available methods. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 29(4), 315–323. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e318182a4ea
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, L. A. (2010). Movement assessment battery for children- second edition (MABC-2). London: Pearson Education International.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407–415. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janssen, A. J. W. M., Diekema, E. T. W., Dolder van, R., Kollée, L. A. A., Oostendorp, R. A. B., & Nijhuis-van derSanden, M. W. G. (2012). Development of a movement quality measurement tool for children. Physical Therapy, 92(4), 574–594. doi:10.2522/ptj.20100354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper, S. J., Maher, C. G., & Mackay, G. (2009). Global rating of change scales: A review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 17(3), 163–170. doi:10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamper, S. J., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Knol, D. L., Maher, C. G., de Vet, H. C. W., & Hancock, M. J. (2010). Global perceived effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 760–766. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. V., & Morrison, C. S. (2002). Qualitative analysis of human movement (2nd ed.). Leeds: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen, H. H., Hartvigsen, J., Korsholm, L., Grunnet-Nilsson, N., & Manniche, C. (2007). Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness. Pain, 131(1), 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill, R., & Anderson, D. (2014). Motor control theories. In Motor learning and control. Concepts and applications (10th ed.). Singapore: McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. L., Silberstein, C. E., Atkins, E. A., Harryman, S. E., Sponseller, P. D., & Hadley-Miller, N. a. (2007). Comparing reliability and validity of pediatric instruments for measuring health and well-being of children with spastic cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 44(7), 468–476. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00308.x
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., de Vet, H. C. W., Prinsen, C. A. C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(2), 105–113. doi:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., … de Vet, H. C.W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogolla, R., Bishop, A., Lewis, M., Grotle, M., & Foster, N.E. (2019). Responsiveness and minimal important change for pain and disability outcome measures in pregnancy-related low back and pelvic girdle pain. Physical Therapy, 99(11), 1551–1561. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzz107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research, applications to practice (3rd ed.). London: Pearson Education International.
   Google Scholar
• Revicki, D. A., Cella, D., Hays, R. D., Sloan, J. A., Lenderking, W. R., & Aaronson, N. K. (2006). Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4(1), 5. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rysstad, T., Røe, Y., Haldorsen, B., Svege, I., & Strand, L. I. (2017). Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Norwegian version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1616-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Getting started. In Motor learning and performance, a situation-based learning approach (4th ed., pp. 3–23). Leeds: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, W., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Janssen, R., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2014). The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 53–57. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-12-53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shoukri, M. M., Asyali, M. H., & Donner, A. (2004). Sample size for a reliability study. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 13(4), 251–271. doi:10.1191/0962280204sm365ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjaerven, L. H., Kristoffersen, K., & Gard, G. (2008). An eye for movement quality: A phenomenological study of movement quality reflecting a group of physiotherapists’ understanding of the phenomenon. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 24(1), 13–27. doi:10.1080/01460860701378042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smits-Engelsman, B. (2010). Movement assessment battery for children-2. Dutch standardization. Amsterdam: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sorsdahl, A. B., Moe-Nilssen, R., Kaale, H. K., Rieber, J., & Strand, L. I. (2010). Change in basic motor abilities, quality of movement and everyday activities following intensive, goal-directed, activity-focused physiotherapy in a group setting for children with cerebral palsy. BMC Pediatrics, 10(1), 26. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-10-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford, P., W., Binkley, J., M., & Riddle, D., L. (1996). Health status measures: Strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Physical Therapy, 76(10), 1109–1123. doi:10.1093/ptj/76.10.1109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuge, B., Krogstad Jenssen, H., & Grotle, M. (2017). The pelvic girdle questionnaire: Responsiveness and minimal important change in women with pregnacy-related pelvic girdle pain, low back pain, or both. Physical Therapy, 97(11), 1103–1113. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzx078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D.M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A.W.M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., … de Vet, H. C.W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kampen, D. A., Willems, W. J., van Beers, L. W. A. H., Castelein, R. M., Scholtes, V. A. B., & Terwee, C. B. (2013). Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 8(1), 40. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-8-40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Walraven, C., Mahon, J. L., Moher, D., Bohm, C., & Laupacis, A. (1999). Surveying physicians to determine the minimal important difference. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(8), 717–723. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00050-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, F. V., Rosenbaum, P., Fehlings, D., Mesterman, R., Breuer, U., & Kim, M. (2014). The quality function measure: Reliability and discriminant validity of a new measure of quality of gross motor movement in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 56(8), 770–778. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuang, Y., Su, J., & Su, C. (2012). Reliability and responsiveness of the movement assessment battery for children – second edition test in children with developmental coordination disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 54, 160–165. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04177.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrwich, K. W., Nienaber, N. A., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1999). Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 37(5), 469–478. doi:10.1097/00005650-199905000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar