References
- Corbetta, D., & Snapp-Childs, W. (2009). Seeing and touching: The role of sensory-motor experience on the development of infant reaching. Infant Behavior & Development, 32(1), 44–58.
- Corbetta, D., Williams, J. L., & Haynes, J. M. (2016). Bare fingers, but no obvious influence of "prickly" Velcro! In the absence of parents’ encouragement, it is not clear that "sticky mittens" provide an advantage to the process of learning to reach. Infant Behavior & Development, 42, 168–178.
- Cunha, A. B., Lobo, M. A., Kokkoni, E., Galloway, J. C., & Tudella, E. (2016). Effect of short-term training on reaching behavior in infants: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Motor Behavior, 48(2), 132–142.
- Cunha, A. B., Woollacott, M., & Tudella, E. (2013). Influence of specific training on spatiotemporal parameters at the onset of goal-directed reaching in infants: A controlled clinical trial. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 17(4), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552013005000099
- Furlan, A. D., Pennick, V., Bombardier, C., & van Tulder, M, Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. (2009). 2009 Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the. Spine, 34(18), 1929–1941.
- Guimarães, E. L., Cunha, A. B., Soares, D. A., & Tudella, E. (2013). Reaching behavior in preterm infants during the first year of life: A systematic review. Motor Control, 17(4), 340–354.
- Guimarães, E. L., & Tudella, E. (2015). Immediate effect of training at the onset of reaching in preterm infants: Randomized clinical trial. Journal of Motor Behavior, 47(6), 535–549.
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
- Kleim, J. A., & Jones, T. A. (2008). Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 51(1), S225–S239.
- Libertus, K., & Needham, A. (2010). Teach to reach: the effects of active vs. passive reaching experiences on action and perception. Vision Research, 50(24), 2750–2757.
- Libertus, K., & Needham, A. (2011). Reaching experience increases face preference in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1355–1364.
- Libertus, K., & Needham, A. (2014). Encouragement is nothing without control: Factors influencing the development of reaching and face preference. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2013-0019
- Libertus, K., & Landa, R. J. (2014). Scaffolded reaching experiences encourage grasping activity in infants at high risk for autism. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1071.
- Libertus, K., Joh, A. S., & Needham, A. W. (2016). Motor training at 3 months affects object exploration 12 months later. Developmental Science, 19(6), 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12370
- Lobo, M. A., Galloway, J. C., & Savelsbergh, G. J. (2004). General and task-related experiences affect early object interaction. Child Development, 75(4), 1268–1281.
- Lobo, M. A., & Galloway, J. C. (2013). The onset of reaching significantly impacts how infants explore both objects and their bodies. Infant Behavior & Development, 36(1), 14–24.
- Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003). Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy, 83(8), 713–721.
- Maitre, N. L., Jeanvoine, A., Yoder, P. J., Key, A. P., Slaughter, J. C., Carey, H., Needham, A., Murray, M. M., Heathcock, J., & BBOP group. (2020). Kinematic and somatosensory gains in infants with cerebral palsy after a multi-component upper-extremity intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Topography, 33(6), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-020-00790-5
- Morton, N. A. (2009). The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study. The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 55(2), 129–133.
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G, The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
- Nascimento, A. L., Toledo, A. M., Merey, L. F., Tudella, E., & Soares-Marangoni, D. A. (2019). Brief reaching training with "sticky mittens" in preterm infants: Randomized controlled trial. Human Movement Science, 63, 138–147.
- Nascimento, A. L., Tedesco, N. M., & Soares-Marangoni, D. A. (2019). Evidence of training influence on infant manual behavior: A systematic review. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 29(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v29.9425
- Needham, A. W., Wiesen, S. E., Hejazi, J. N., Libertus, K., & Christopher, C. (2017). Characteristics of brief sticky mittens training that lead to increases in object exploration. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 209–224.
- Needham, A., Joh, A. S., Wiesen, S. E., & Williams, N. (2014). Effects of contingent reinforcement of actions on infants’ object‐directed reaching. Infancy, 19(5), 496–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12058
- Needham, A., Barrett, T., & Peterman, K. (2002). A pick-me-up for infants’ exploratory skills: Early simulated experiences reaching for objects using ‘sticky mittens’ enhances young infants’ object exploration skills. Infant Behavior and Development, 25(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00097-8
- Oakes, L. M. (2017). Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research. Infancy, 22(4), 436–469.
- Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2010). Aprendizagem e performance motora: uma abordagem da aprendizagem baseada no problema (3rd ed.). Artmed.
- Soares, D., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J., & Tudella, E. (2013). The effect of a short bout of practice on reaching behavior in late preterm infants at the onset of reaching: a randomized controlled trial. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(12), 4546–4558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.028
- Soares, D. A., Cunha, A. B., & Tudella, E. (2014). Differences between late preterm and full-term infants: Comparing effects of a short bout of practice on early reaching behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11), 3096–3107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.041
- Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., Kamm, K., Spencer, J. P., Schneider, K., & Zernicke, R. F. (1993). The transition to reaching: Mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. Child Development, 64(4), 1058–1098.
- Van den Berg, L., & Gredebäck, G. (2020). The sticky mittens paradigm: A critical appraisal of current results and explanations. Developmental Science, 0, e13036.
- Verhagen, A. P., de Vet, H. C., de Bie, R. A., Kessels, A. G., Boers, M., Bouter, L. M., & Knipschild, P. G. (1998). The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(12), 1235–1241.
- Wiesen, S. E., Watkins, R. M., & Needham, A. W. (2016). Active motor training has long-term effects on infants’ object exploration. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 599.
- Williams, J. L., Corbetta, D., & Guan, Y. (2015). Learning to reach with "sticky" or "non-sticky" mittens: A tale of developmental trajectories. Infant Behavior & Development, 38, 82–96.
- World Health Organization (WHO). International clinical trials registry platform [cited 2022 January]. https://www.who.int/ictrp/en/.