Community Plan Making in the Face of Ethnic Conflict in Israel: Lessons for Collaborative Planning Processes

References

• Alterman, R., Vranesky, A., & Churchman, A. (1986). Participation in the framework of the Israeli Planning and Building Law: Existing and potential. Haifa, Israel: Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Center for Urban and Regional Studies. ( original in Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., Friedman, R. A., & Kolb, D. M. (1991). The group and what happens on the way to “yes.”Negotiation Journal, 7(2), 155–173. doi:10.1007/BF01000347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2006, June) The problematique of community-based conservation in a multi-level world. Paper presented at the Survival of the Commons: Mounting challenges and new realities, the eleventh conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bali, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10535/1880
   Google Scholar
• Bollens, S. (2000). On narrow ground: Urban policy and ethnic conflict in Jerusalem and Belfast. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crump, L. (2007). Temporal model of negotiation linkage dynamics. Negotiation Journal, 23(2): 117–153. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.
2007.00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, L. (2011). Negotiation process and negotiation context. International Negotiation, 16, 197–227. doi:10.1163/138234011X573011
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (Eds.). (1995). Non-governmental organizations performance and accountability: Beyond the magic bullet. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, M., & Shmueli, D. (2015). Final report: Maryland. In E. ­Feitelson, B. Heyman, E. Razin, E. Stern, & D. Shmueli (Eds.), Planning systems and processes in western countries: Comparative research and lessons for Israel (pp. 7–10). Final report, Stage B. Jerusalem, Israel: Israeli Ministry of Interior. ( original in Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2013). Planning in the face of conflict: The surprising possibilities of facilitative leadership. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2016). Daunting or inviting: “Context” as your working theory of practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 169–172. 
doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1165515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, J., & Kedar, A. S. (2004). From Arab land to “Israel lands”: The legal dispossession of the Palestinians displaced by Israel in the wake of 1948. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(6), 809–830. doi:10.1068/d402;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg Commission. (2008). Goldberg commission report. Retrieved from http://www.knesset.gov.il/mmm/data/pdf/m03292.pdf ( original in Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–162. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40113141
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101–123. doi:10.1177/14730952030022002
   Google Scholar
• Herring, R. (2001). Political Ecology: Some cautions on localism. In I. Buck, C. Geisler, J. Schelhas, & E. Wollenberg (Eds.), Biological ­diversity: Balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management (pp. 187–204). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. (1977). Planning in turbulence: Urban and regional planning in Israel, 1948–1977 (Working Paper 78). Haifa, Israel: Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460–472. doi:10.1080/01944369608975712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (2004). Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3(1), 5–20. doi:10.1177/1473095204042315
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999a). Consensus building and ­complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423. doi:10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999b). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 9–26. doi:10.1080/01944369908976031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Abingdon, 
UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (1949). Israel statistical yearbook, No. 1. Jerusalem, Israel: Central Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Israel statistical yearbook, No. 67. Jerusalem, Israel: Central Bureau of Statistics
   Google Scholar
• Kedar, A. S., & Yiftachel, O. (2006). Land regime and social relations in Israel. In H. de Soto & F. Cheneval (Eds.), Swiss human rights book (vol. 1, pp. 129–146; notes and references, pp. 292–296). Zurich, Switzerland: Ruffer and Rub. Retrieved from 
http://ssrn.com/abstract=906336
   Google Scholar
• Kokx, A., & van Kempen, R., 2010, Dutch urban governance: Multi-level or multi-scalar? European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(4), 355–369. doi:10.1177/0969776409350691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L. (2016, September13). Thousands of protesters are gathering in North Dakota—And it could lead to nationwide reform. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/photos-north-dakota-pipeline-protest-2016-9/#while-members-of-the-standing-rock-sioux-tribes-began-protesting-the-project-as-early-as-april-protests-heated-up-in-august-as-numbers-increased-to-the-
thousands-1
   Google Scholar
• Meir, A., & Marx, E. (2005). Land, towns and planning: The Negev Bedouin and the state of Israel. Geography Research Forum, 25, 43–62. Retrieved from http://raphael.geography.ad.bgu.ac.il/ojs/index.php/GRF/article/view/290
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior. (2010). Chawaled appeal decision summary. Retrieved from http://mavat.moin.gov.il/MavatPS/Forms/SV4.aspx?tid=4&pid=99008605 ( original in Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior. (2012). Haifa district plan approval decision. Retrieved from http://mavat.moin.gov.il/MavatPS/Forms/SV4.aspx?tid=4&pid=99001907 ( original in Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N., & Wright, S. (Eds.) (1995). Power and participatory development: Theory and practice. London, UK: Intermediate 
Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nofit Informational Booklet. (2015).[Nofit Community Newsletter]. ( original in Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podziba, S. (2012). Civic fusion: Mediating polarized public disputes. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Prachett, L. (2004). Local autonomy, local democracy and the “New Localism.”Political Studies, 52(2), 358–375. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00484.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2002). Deliberative planning and decision making: An impossibility result. Journal of American Planning Association, 21(4), 367–378. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShmueliD. F., & Khamaisi, R. (2015). Israel’s invisible Negev Bedouin: Issues of land and spatial planning. Geneva, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. L. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., & Elliott, M. (1983). Paternalism, conflict, and coproduction. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L. E., & McKearnan, S. (1999). The evolution of public policy dispute resolution. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 16(2), 96–115. http://www.lockescience.com/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, L. E., McKearnen, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., & Ozawa, C. (1984). Mediated negotiation in the public sector: The planner as mediator. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 4(1), 5–15. doi:10.1177/0739456X8400400103
   Google Scholar
• Trapenberg Frick, K. (2013) The actions of discontent: Tea Party and property rights activists pushing back against regional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(3), 190–200. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.885312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2016, December4). Army will not grant easement for North Dakota access pipeline crossing. U.S. Army ASA (CW) [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.army.mil/­article/179095/army_will_not_grant_easement_for_dakota_access_pipeline_crossing
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, W. (2016, November12). The $3.7-billion pipeline that became a rallying cry for tribes across America. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sej-dakota-access-pipeline-20160912-snap-story.html
   Google Scholar