References
- Aldridge, D., Biesta, G., Filippakou, O., & Wainwright, E. (2018). Why the nature of educational research should remain contested: A statement from the new editors of the. British Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 1–4. doi:10.1002/berj.3326
- Forsyth, A. (2019). Linking research and practice in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(2), 81–82. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1601958
- Goldstein, H., & Maier, G. (2010). The use and valuation of journals in planning scholarship: Peer assessment versus impact factors. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30(1), 66–75. doi:10.1177/0739456X10375944
- Goodin, R. E. (2010). The career of a generalist journal. British Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 1–10. doi:10.1017/S0007123409990305
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics: Use these ten principles to guide research evaluation. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.
- Nagel, J. (2010). State of independence: Explaining and maintaining the distinctive competence of the British Journal of Political Science. British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 711–724. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000256
- Roncaglia, A. (2013). Introduction: On the role of a generalist journal. PSL Quarterly Review, 66(264), 3–6.
- Stevens, M. R., Park, K., Tian, G., Kim, K., & Ewing, R. (2019). Why do some articles in planning journals get cited more than others? Journal of Planning Education and Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0739456X19827083