REFERENCES
- Faff, R. W. (2018). Essential tips on refereeing for academic journals. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3269643
- Forsyth, A. (2019a). How JAPA articles get published. (Nerd alert: Technical details). American Planning Association. https://www.planning.org/blog/9179610/how-japa-articles-get-published/
- Forsyth, A. (2019b). Scholarly publication in an information age: JAPA’s place. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1648947
- Forsyth, A. (2019c). What makes a good JAPA article? (Nerd alert: Technical details). American Planning Association. https://www.planning.org/blog/9179608/what-makes-a-good-japa-article/
- Freeling, B., Doubleday, Z. A., & Connell, S. D. (2019). Opinion: How can we boost the impact of publications? Try better writing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(2), 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819937116
- Garvalov, B. K. (2015). Who stands to win from double-blind peer review? Advances in Regenerative Biology, 2(1), 26879. https://doi.org/10.3402/arb.v2.26879
- Harington, R. (2018, May 16). Peer review – Authors and reviewers – Our north star. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/05/16/peer-review-autoers-reviewers-north-star/
- Kaji-O’Grady, S. (2017). Gender and anonymous peer review. In H. Frichot, C. Gabrielsson, & H. Runting (Eds.), Architecture and feminisms (1st ed., pp. 132–139). Routledge.
- Martínez, A., & Mammola, S. (2021). Specialized terminology reduces the number of citations of scientific papers. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, 288, 20202581. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2581
- Meadows, A., & Wulf, K. (2019, September 16). Quality is multi-dimensional: How many ways can you define quality in peer review? The Scholarly Kitchen, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/09/16/quality-is-multi-dimensional-how-many-ways-can-you-define-quality-in-peer-review/
- Seeber, M., & Bacchelli, A. (2017). Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers? Scientometrics, 113(1), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2264-7
- van Rooyen, S., Delamothe, T., & Evans, S. J. W. (2010). Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 341, c5729. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5729
- Wallace, J. (2021, July 6). Revisiting: How to be a good peer reviewer. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/07/06/revisiting-how-to-be-a-good-peer-reviewer/