Toward Evidence-Based Urban Planning

References

• Abu Hatab, A., Cavinato, M., Lindemer, A., & Lagerkvist, C. (2019). Urban sprawl, food security and agricultural systems in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature. Cities, 94, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins, A., Makarewicz, C., Scanze, M., Ingram, M., & Luhr, G. (2017). Contextualizing walkability: Do relationships between built environments and walking vary by socioeconomic context? Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2017.1322527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Vist, G. E., Falck-Ytter, Y., Meerpohl, J., Norris, S., & Guyatt, G. H. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, N., Haque, M. l., King, M., Kamruzzaman, M., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2021). A systematic review of the factors associated with pedestrian route choice. Transport Reviews. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2000064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownson, R., Fielding, J., & Maylahn, C. (2009). Evidence-based public health: A fundamental concept for public health practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 30(1), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón-Argelich, A., Benetti, S., Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J., Langemeyer, J., & Baró, F. (2021). Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem service literature: A systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P., & Handy, S. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802539195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CASP. (2021). CASP checklists. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
   Google Scholar
• The Cochrane Collaboration. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 5.1.0). www.handbook.cochrane.org
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, J. (2012). Choosing the size of the sample. In J. Daniel (Ed.), Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers, A., Betancourt, T., Kergoat, Y., Servilli, C., Say, L., & Kobeissi, L. (2020). A systematic review of sexual and reproductive health interventions for young people in humanitarian and lower-and-middle-income country settings. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 666. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08818-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., & El-Geneidy, A. (2021). What is a good transport review paper? Transport Reviews, 41(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2001996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, M., Thomas, H., O'Brien, M., & Duggan, M. (2004). Use of systematic reviews in the development of new provincial public health policies in Ontario. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 20(4), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462304001278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effective Public Healthcare Panacea Project. (2021). Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. https://www.ephpp.ca/quality-assessment-tool-for-quantitative-studies/
   Google Scholar
• Fusch, P., & Ness, L. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., DeBeer, H., Jaeschke, R., Rind, D., Meerpohl, J., Dahm, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2011). GRADE guidelines: Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 383–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes, K. (2011). Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In J. Noyes, A. Booth, K. Hannes, A. Harden, J. Harris, S. Lewin, & C. Lockwood (Eds.), Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions. Version 1 (updated August 2011). Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. J., Dannenberg, A. L., & Frumkin, H. (2013). Health and the built environment: 10 years after. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), 1542–1544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A. (2006). Critical moments in the production of “rigorous” and “relevant” cultural economic geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph610oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., & Stuart, C. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software sngineering. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., Forysth, A., & Slotterback, C. (2009). Is there a role for evidence-based practice in urban planning and policy? Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903417241
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L.-L., Wang, Y.-Y., Yang, Z.-H., Huang, D., Weng, H., & Zeng, X.-T. (2020). Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better? Military Medical Research, 7(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercuri, M., Baigrie, B., & Upshur, R. E. (2018). Going from evidence to recommendations: Can GRADE get us there? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(5), 1232–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, S., Lancione, S., Lang, J., Amankwah, N., de Groh, M., Garcia, A., Merucci, K., & Geneau, R. (2021). Are people who use active modes of transportation more physically active? An overview of reviews across the life course. Transport Reviews. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2004262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRISMA. (2021). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA): Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. http://www.prisma-statement.org/
   Google Scholar
• Shea, B., Reeves, B., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. British Medical Journal, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, M. (2009). “How many cases do I need?”: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South, E., & Lorenc, T. (2020). Use and value of systematic reviews in English local authority public health: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1100 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09223-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. (2001). Systematic reviews: The heart of evidence-based practice. AACN Clinical Issues, 12(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/00044067-200111000-00009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens, M. (2017). Does compact development make people drive less? Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford, E., & Bradshaw, B. (2016). Rigorous and trustworthy: Qualitative research design. In I. Hays & M. Cope (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 92–106). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Wee, B., & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar