Digital Technology Use and Future Expectations

References

• Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2012). Urban planning 2.0. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 1(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2012010103
   Google Scholar
• Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2014). Urban planning 3.0: Impact of recent developments of the web on urban planning. In Z. Mahmood (Ed.), IT in the public sphere: Applications in administration, government, politics, and planning. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4719-0
   Google Scholar
• Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2021). Why working from home will stick. (Working Paper 28731). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731
   Google Scholar
• Barwise, P., & Watkins, L. (2018). The evolution of digital dominance: How and why we got to GAFA. In M. Moore & D. Tambini (Eds.), Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (pp. 21–49). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513390
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batty, M. (2014). Can it happen again? Planning support, Lee’s requiem and the rise of the smart cities movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), 388–391. https://doi.org/10.1068/b4103c2
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2021). The digital transformation of planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211016122
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., Yang, W. (2022). A digital future for planning: Spatial planning reimagined. https://digital4planning.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/A-Digital-Future-for-Planning-Full-Report-Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., Perea, D., & Bednárová, M. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., Carmona, S., & Gallent, N. (2003). Delivering new homes: Processes, planners and providers. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10097009
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, C. (2023). ChatGPT: Implications for planning (PA Quicknotes). American Planning Association. https://www.planning.org/pas/quicknotes/101/chatgpt-implications-for-planning/
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, C., & Pettit, C. (2021). Digital disruption and planning: Use of data and digital technology by professional planners, and perceptions of change to planning work. Australian Planner, 57(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2021.1920995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, C., & Pettit, C. (2022). Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(7), 1875–1892. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211072866
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, C. (2020). Digital social innovation and the adoption of #PlanTech: The case of Coventry City Council. Urban Planning, 5(4), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, W. J. (1995). Extending the revolution: Teaching land use planning in a GIS environment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, K. L., Glick, D., Godinez Puig, L., & Palmer, M. (2022). Still muted: The limited participatory democracy of Zoom public meetings. Urban Affairs Review, 59(4), 1279–1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211070494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredericks, J., & Foth, M. (2013). Augmenting public participation: Enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0. Australian Planner, 50(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2012.748083
   Google Scholar
• French, S. P., & Wiggins, L. L. (1989). Computer adoption and use in California planning agencies: Implications for education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 8(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X8900800206
   Google Scholar
• Friel, A., Potts, R., & Shahab, S. (2022). Smarter cities, smarter planning: An exploration into the role of planners within the smart city movement. In Resilient and sustainable cities: Research, policy and practice (pp. 149–171). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (2020). Planning support science: Developments and challenges. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(8), 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320936277
   Google Scholar
• Gilfoyle, I., & Wong, C. (1998). Computer applications in planning: Twenty years’ experience of Cheshire County Council. Planning Practice & Research, 13(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459816193
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S., Higgs, G., & Nevitt, P. (1999). GIS in planning departments: Preliminary results from a survey of local planning authorities in Wales. Planning Practice and Research, 14(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459915643
   Google Scholar
• Göçmen, Z. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2010). Barriers to GIS use in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360903585060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D. R., & McMahon, G. (1992). Staffing the revolution: GIS education for planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 11(3), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9201100306
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J., Edwards, M., & Anthony, J. (2015). Planning skills: An examination of supply and local government demand. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15570321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Cameron-Blake, E., Hallas, L., Majumdar, S., & Tatlow, H. (2021). A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker). Nature Human Behaviour, 5(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., & del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, B. (Ed.). (1965). Urban development models: New tools for planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A. M., & Fertner, C. (2021). Digital plans and plan data in planning support science. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(2), 212–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320983002
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. B., Potts, R., Hartt, M., Situ, M., & Seto, A. (2023). The role of bots in U.S. real estate development online communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 99, 101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, K., Miller, E., & Foth, M. (2014). Integrating ICT into the planning process: Impacts, opportunities and challenges. Australian Planner, 51(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2013.770771
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, P., Shah, S., DeAngelis, J., & Gomez, A. (2023). 2023 Trend report for planners. American Planning Association and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/publication/download_pdf/2023-Trend-Report-For-Planners.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Simpson, D. M. (1993). Implementing GIS for planning: Lessons from the history of technological innovation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(2), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., Cook, M., & Haarstad, H. (2020). Urban planning and the smart city: Projects, practices and politics. Urban Planning, 5(1), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987(35), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1459
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2016). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions: Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., Young, G. W., & Dawkins, O. (2021). Planning and 3D spatial media: Progress, prospects, and the knowledge and experiences of local government planners in Ireland. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1921832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (1987). The politics of computer aided planning. Town Planning Review, 58(4), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.58.4.l45wt05130416rn6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (2012). E-Planning: Retrospect and prospect. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2012010101
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E., & Landis, J. D. (1988). Microcomputers in US planning: Past, present, and future. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 15(3), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1068/b150355
   Google Scholar
• Kontokosta, C. E. (2021). Urban informatics in the science and practice of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(4), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18793716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, K. L., King, J. L. (2003). Information technology and administrative reform: Will the time after e-government be different? https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rd511db
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. (1973). Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367308977851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumivero. (2020). NVivo (Version 12). www.lumivero.com
   Google Scholar
• Meenar, M., & Afzalan, N. (2023). Urban planners’ roles, perceptions, needs, and concerns in smart city planning: A survey of U.S. planners. International Planning Studies, 28(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2022.2136628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milz, D., & Gervich, C. D. (2021). Participation and the pandemic: How planners are keeping democracy alive, online. Town Planning Review, 92(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milz, D., Pokharel, A., & Gervich, C. D. (2023). Facilitating online participatory planning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the American Planning Association. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2023.2185658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagu, A. S. (2001). Repackaging the revolution: Making GIS instruction relevant to planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102100206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, L., Deakin, M., & Reid, A. (2019). Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mualam, N., Israel, E., & Max, D. (2022). Moving to online planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An assessment of Zoom and the impact of ICT on planning boards’ discussions. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X221105811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local e-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenAI. (2022, November 30). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. OpenAI. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
   Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P. (2017). Usefulness of planning support systems: A conceptual framework and an empirical illustration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 104, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning Institute of Australia. (2021). Planning Institute of Australia PlanTech principles. https://www.planning.org.au/planningresourcesnew/plantech-pages/pia-plantech-principles
   Google Scholar
• Potts, R. (2020). Is a new “Planning 3.0” paradigm emerging? Exploring the relationship between digital technologies and planning theory and practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1748699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Russo, P., Lanzilotti, R., Costabile, M. F., & Pettit, C. J. (2018). Adoption and use of software in land use planning practice: A multiple-country study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1327213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T. W., Shumway, H., Gordner, T., & Lim, T. (2023). The prospects of artificial intelligence in urban planning. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2102538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of research on e-planning: ICTs for urban development and monitoring. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3
   Google Scholar
• Son, T. H., Weedon, Z., Yigitcanlar, T., Sanchez, T., Corchado, J. M., & Mehmood, R. (2023). Algorithmic urban planning for smart and sustainable development: Systematic review of the literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 94, 104562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M. (2014). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2005). Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 37(5), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2013a). Investigating e-planning in practice: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 2(3), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2013070102
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2013b). Web 2.0 and social media growth in planning practice: A longitudinal study. Planning Practice and Research, 28(5), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.840996
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2022). COVID-19 and the rise of digital planning: Fast and slow adoption of a digital planning system. Town Planning Review, 93(5), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2022.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar