Network Power or Power-Penetrated Network?

References

• Adman, P., & Jansson, H. (2017). A field experiment on ethnic discrimination among local Swedish public officials. Local Government Studies, 43(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1244052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzalan, N., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2013). The role of online neighborhood groups in creating self-organized and resilient communities. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:2bfe4c36-81b4-4f82-a88a-ce22469e50d3
   Google Scholar
• Aikins, S. K., & Krane, D. (2010). Are public officials obstacles to citizen-centered e-government? An examination of municipal administrators’ motivations and actions. State and Local Government Review, 42(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X1036915
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, H. S. (1994). Community and consensus: Reality and fantasy in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9401300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxamusa, M. H. (2008). Empowering communities through deliberation the model of community benefits agreements. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0730844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boamah, E. F., Watson, V., Amoako, C., Grooms, W., Osei, D., Osei Kwadwo, V., Nyamekye, A. B., Adamu, K., & Appiah, G. K. (2022). Planning corruption or corrupting planning? A Sub-Saharan Africa perspective. Journal of the American Planning Association, 88(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1987969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X020210030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social networks, 27(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2006). A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 28(4), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borich, G. (2012). The broader social network of community planning: A diagnostic tool for communities to assess their planning capacity [Dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1009712058?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
   Google Scholar
• Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network. Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J. C. (2022). The impact of sports stadiums on localized commercial activity: Evidence from a business improvement district. Journal of Regional Science, 62(1), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross‐sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlew, T. (2018, February 12). City posts first batch of FBI subpoenaed Maddox emails. Tallahassee Democrat. https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/02/12/city-posts-first-fbi-subpoenaed-maddox-emails/328926002/
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. (2013). Collaborative planning in the network: Consensus seeking in urban planning issues on the Internet—The case of China. Planning Theory, 12(4), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521349965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chute, N. (2019, January 25). Timeline to trouble: How Andrew Gillum got mixed up in an FBI probe and ethics inquiry. Tallahassee Democrat. https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2019/01/25/andrew-gillum-fbi-investigation-timeline-adam-corey-mike-miller/2677502002/
   Google Scholar
• Dempwolf, C. S., & Lyles, L. W. (2012). The uses of social network analysis in planning: A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412211411092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyle, R. E., & Wiedenman, R. E. (2014). Collaborative planning by metropolitan planning organizations: A test of causal theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14527621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eräranta, S., & Mladenović, M. N. (2021). Networked dynamics of knowledge integration in strategic spatial planning processes: A social network approach. Regional Studies, 55(5), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1739637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahmi, F. Z., Prawira, M. I., Hudalah, D., & Firman, T. (2016). Leadership and collaborative planning: The case of Surakarta, Indonesia. Planning Theory, 15(3), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521558465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farthing, S., & Ashley, K. (2002). Negotiations and the delivery of affordable housing through the English planning system. Planning Practice and Research, 17(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450220125078
   Google Scholar
• Fischler, R. (2000). Communicative planning theory: A Foucauldian assessment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the face of power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1987). Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368708976450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. E., & Butler, W. H. (2010). Expanding the scope and impact of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(2), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003646463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannibal, B., Meerow, S., Woodruff, S. C., Roy, M., Gilbertson, P. G., & Matos, M. (2022). Who collaborates on urban resilience? An analysis of flood resilience planning networks in four coastal cities. Journal of Urban Affairs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2137033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannibal, B., Woodruff, S., & Malecha, M. (2021). The overlap of collaboration and planning networks: A post-Harvey study. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X21995899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Traditions of planning thought. In P. Healey (Ed.), Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (pp. 7–30). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., Booher, D. E., & Di Vittorio, S. (2010). Strategies for megaregion governance: Collaborative dialogue, networks, and self-organization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.533640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana, R., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Choudhuri, A. K. (2013). Reciprocity among farmers in farming system research: Application of social network analysis. Journal of Human Ecology, 41(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2013.11906552
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, W. A., & Samanta, A. (2018). Network structure and adaptive capacity in watershed governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1287063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Basic methods for analyzing networks. In D. Knoke & S. Yang (Eds.), Social network analysis (pp. 46–92). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. M. (1990). What local economic developers actually do: Location quotients versus press releases. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369008975756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyles, W. (2015). Using social network analysis to examine planner involvement in environmentally oriented planning processes led by non-planning professions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), 1961–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.973478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machler, L., & Milz, D. (2015). Innes: The evolution of communicative planning theory. Young Academics Booklet Series. InPlanning.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M. (2001). Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical review E, 69(2), 026113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1987). Measures of reciprocity in a social network. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 49(2), 141–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25050639
   Google Scholar
• Samsura, D. A. A., van der Krabben, E., van Deemen, A. M. A., & van der Heijden, R. E. C. M. (2015). Negotiation processes in land and property development: An experimental study. Journal of Property Research, 32(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2015.1009846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweers, J. (2017, May 26). City Commissioner Scott Maddox asks for Edison audit. Tallahassee Democrat. https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2017/05/16/city-commissioner-scott-maddox-asks-edison-audit/101744220/
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, D. F. (2017). Community plan making in the face of ethnic conflict in Israel: Lessons for collaborative planning processes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2017.1286230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegfried, J. J., & Zimbalist, A. (2000). The economics of sports facilities and their communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley, S. R., Annis, C., & Boodry, T. (2019, April). Cost overruns and public infrastructure: The case of Tallahassee’s Cascades Park & Trail. Policy Study. https://coss.fsu.edu/dmc/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2020/09/DeVoeMooreCtrCascadesParkFINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tangled web: See the records that are now in the FBI’s hands. (2023). Tallahassee Democrat. https://data.tallahassee.com/fbi-cra-documents/
   Google Scholar
• Tallahassee Reports. (2017, May 21). Political ties between the Edison and City of Tallahassee run deep. https://tallahasseereports.com/2017/05/21/political-ties-between-the-edison-and-city-of-tallahassee-run-deep/
   Google Scholar
• Waters, T. (2015, October 16). The Edison, its investors and political roots. Tallahassee Democrat. https://www.tallahassee.com/story/money/2015/10/16/edison-its-investors-and-political-roots/74017352/
   Google Scholar
• Waters, T., & Schweers, J. (2017, May 11). Edison shakeup prompts city scrutiny. Tallahassee Democrat. https://www.tallahassee.com/story/money/2017/05/11/edison-shakeup-prompts-city-scrutiny/101519682/
   Google Scholar
• Westin, M. (2022). The framing of power in communicative planning theory: Analysing the work of John Forester, Patsy Healey and Judith Innes. Planning Theory, 21(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952211043219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Powers, L. (2013). Teaching planners to deal: The pedagogical value of a (simulated) economic development negotiation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(3), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13482979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W., He, F., Zhuang, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in the decision-making of industrial land redevelopment in China: The case of Shanghai. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar