112
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

REFERENCES

  • Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning key concepts for global change policy: Robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05178-180208
  • ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. (2023). ATLAS.ti Windows (version 23.0.1) [Qualitative data analysis software]. https://atlasti.com
  • Berke, P. (2016). Twenty years after Campbell’s vision: Have we achieved more sustainable cities? Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 380–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1214539
  • Berke, P., & Conroy, M. M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976081
  • Bick, N., & Keele, D. (2022). Sustainability and climate change: Understanding the political use of environmental terms in municipal governments. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100145
  • Brink, M., Hengeveld, G. M., & Tobi, H. (2020). Interdisciplinary measurement: A systematic review of the case of sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106145
  • Brundtland Commission. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. United Nations General Assembly Document A/42/427.
  • Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975696
  • Campbell, S. (2016). The Planner’s Triangle revisited: Sustainability and the evolution of a planning ideal that can’t stand still. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080
  • Cho, W., Kim, D., & Park, A. Y. S. (2023). Local government’s resource commitment to environmental sustainability: Capacity, conservatism, and contractual dynamics. Urban Affairs Review, 59(2), 447–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211064976
  • Cohen, M. (2017). A systematic review of urban sustainability assessment literature. Sustainability, 9(11), 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112048
  • Curl, A., Nelson, J. D., & Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.07.001
  • Davidson, K. M., Kellett, J., Wilson, L., & Pullen, S. (2012). Assessing urban sustainability from a social democratic perspective: A thematic approach. Local Environment, 17(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.631990
  • Deslatte, A., & Feiock, R. C. (2019). The collaboration riskscape: Fragmentation, problem types and preference divergence in urban sustainability. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(2), 352–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy020
  • Deslatte, A., Krause, R. M., & Hawkins, C. V. (2022). The road to routinization: A functional collective action approach for local sustainability planning and performance management. State and Local Government Review, 54(4), 0160323X2211110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X221111065
  • Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746
  • Fenton, P., & Gustafsson, S. (2017). Moving from high-level words to local action—Governance for urban sustainability in municipalities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009
  • Forester, J. (2022). Options analysis as context-responsiveness in practice: Integrating diagnosis, expertise, and negotiation (refining communicative planning and critical pragmatism). Planning Theory & Practice, 23(5), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2133158
  • Forester, J. (2023). How planners might improvise in the face of power: Waking up theory for practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 24(2), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2210474
  • Goldstein, B. E. (2010). Epistemic mediation: Aligning expertise across boundaries within an endangered species habitat conservation plan. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.525374
  • Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2013). Leading with political astuteness: A study of public managers in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Australia and New Zealand School of Government and the Chartered Management Institute. http://apo.org.au/node/35465
  • Hawkins, C. V. (2014). Competing interests and the political market for smart growth policy. Urban Studies, 51(12), 2503–2522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013512875
  • Hawkins, C. V., Krause, R., & Deslatte, A. (2023). Staff support and administrative capacity in strategic planning for local sustainability. Public Management Review, 25(5), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1999667
  • Homsy, G. C., & Warner, M. E. (2015). Cities and sustainability: Polycentric action and multilevel governance. Urban Affairs Review, 51(1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414530545
  • Homsy, G. C., Warner, M. E., & Liao, L. (2016). Sustainability and local governments: Planning helps balance environmental, economic, and social equity priorities. Local Government Review, 98(11), 5–14.
  • Huang, L., Wu, J., & Yan, L. (2015). Defining and measuring urban sustainability: A review of indicators. Landscape Ecology, 30(7), 1175–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0208-2
  • Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975956
  • Jepson, E. J., Jr. (2004). The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities: How wide, how deep, and what role for planners? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03258638
  • Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robèrt, K.-H. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 14(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.01.375
  • Keith, M., Birch, E., Buchoud, N. J. A., Cardama, M., Cobbett, W., Cohen, M., Elmqvist, T., Espey, J., Hajer, M., Hartmann, G., Matsumoto, T., Parnell, S., Revi, A., Roberts, D. C., Saiz, E., Schwanen, T., Seto, K. C., Tuts, R., & van der Pütten, M. (2022). A new urban narrative for sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 6(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00979-5
  • Krause, R. M., Fatemi, S. M., Nguyen Long, L. A., Arnold, G., & Hofmeyer, S. L. (2023). What is the future of survey-based data collection for local government research? Trends, strategies, and recommendations. Urban Affairs Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874231175837
  • Krause, R. M., & Hawkins, C. V. (2021). Implementing city sustainability: Overcoming administrative silos to achieve functional collective action. Temple University Press.
  • Krause, R. M., Hawkins, C. V., & Park, A. Y. (2021). The perfect amount of help: An examination of the relationship between capacity and collaboration in urban energy and climate initiatives. Urban Affairs Review, 57(2), 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419884650
  • Kwon, M., Jang, H. S., & Feiock, R. C. (2014). Climate protection and energy sustainability policy in California cities: What have we learned? Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(5), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12094
  • Laurian, L. (2009). Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935090322981
  • Laurian, L., & Crawford, J. (2016). Organizational factors of environmental sustainability implementation: An empirical analysis of US cities and counties. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(4), 482–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1138403
  • Levesque, V. R., Bell, K. P., & Calhoun, A. J. (2017). Planning for sustainability in small municipalities: The influence of interest groups, growth patterns, and institutional characteristics. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(3), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16655601
  • Lorr, M. J. (2012). Defining urban sustainability in the context of North American cities. Nature and Culture, 7(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2012.070102
  • Martin, T. G., Burgman, M. A., Fidler, F., Kuhnert, P. M., Low-Choy, S., McBride, M., & Mengersen, K. (2012). Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 26(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01806.x
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Maxwell, J. A., & Miller, B. A. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In P. Leavy & S. Hesse-Biber (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461–477). Guilford Press.
  • McLean, B. L., & Borén, T. (2015). Barriers to implementing sustainability locally: A case study of policy immobilities. Local Environment, 20(12), 1489–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.909798
  • O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940691989922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
  • Oden, M. (2010). Equity: The forgotten E in sustainable development. In S. Moore (Ed.), Pragmatic sustainability: Theoretical and practical tools. (pp. 31–49) Routledge.
  • Opp, S. M. (2017). The forgotten pillar: A definition for the measurement of social sustainability in American cities. Local Environment, 22(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1195800
  • Opp, S. M., & Saunders, K. L. (2013). Pillar talk: Local sustainability initiatives and policies in the United States: Finding evidence of the “three E’s”: Economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. Urban Affairs Review, 49(5), 678–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412469344
  • Park, A. Y., & Krause, R. M. (2021). Exploring the landscape of sustainability performance management systems in US local governments. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111764
  • Portney, K. E. (2013). Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
  • Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
  • Qualtrics. (2020). Qualtrics software (Version 2023) [Computer software]. https://www.qualtrics.com
  • Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987-2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.281
  • Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017
  • Romero-Lankao, P., Gnatz, D. M., Wilhelmi, O., & Hayden, M. (2016). Urban sustainability and resilience: From theory to practice. Sustainability, 8(12), 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121224
  • Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161
  • Saha, D., & Paterson, R. G. (2008). Local government efforts to promote the “Three Es” of sustainable development: Survey in medium to large cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08321803
  • Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015
  • Scoones, I. (2016). The politics of sustainability and development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039
  • Svara, J. H., Watt, T. C., & Jang, H. S. (2013). How are U.S. cities doing sustainability? Who is getting on the sustainability train, and why? Cityscape, 15(1), 9–44.
  • Tvinnereim, E., & Fløttum, K. (2015). Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(8), 744–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2663
  • Wang, X., Hawkins, C., & Berman, E. (2014). Financing sustainability and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from US cities. Urban Affairs Review, 50(6), 806–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414522388
  • Zeemering, E. (2009). What does sustainability mean to city officials? Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409337297
  • Zeemering, E. (2012). Recognising interdependence and defining multi-level governance in city sustainability plans. Local Environment, 17(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.678315

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.