Advanced search
Publication Cover
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences Volume 23, 2003 - Issue 1-2: Modern Mathematical, Management, & Statistical Sciences, II
Submit an article Journal homepage
27
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Subjective Probability and Information: A Constructive Perspective

M. R. YilmazNortheastern University College of Business AdministrationBoston, MA02115
Pages 7-35 | Published online: 14 Aug 2013

  • BeachL. R. and BraunG. P. (1994). Laboratory Studies of Subjective Probability: A Status Report. In WrightG and AytonP. (Eds.) Subjective Probability. Wiley, Chichester.
  • BriggsL. K. and KrantzD. H. (1992). Judging the Strength of Designated Evidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 77–106.
  • BuchananB. G. and ShortliffeE. H.(Eds.) (1984) Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Programming Project, Addison-Wesley, New York.
  • ClarkS. A. (2000). The Measurement of Qualitative Probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 464–479.
  • CohenM. A. (1991). Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Existence and Uniqueness of Weak Qualitative Probability Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 242–259.
  • CurleyS. P. and BensonP. G. (1994). Applying a Cognitive Perspective to Probability Construction. In WrightG. and AytonP. (Eds.) Subjective Probability, Wiley, Chichester.
  • de FinettiB. (1937). La Prévision ses Lois Logiques, ses Sources Subjectives', Annales de L'Institut Henri Poincaré. 7, 1–68. English translation by KyburgH. E. KyburgH. E. and SmoklerH. E. (Eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, Wiley, New York, 1964.
  • de FinettiB. (1974 / 75). Theory of Probability, Vol. I / II, Wiley, New York.
  • DempsterA. P. (1967). Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 325–339.
  • DempsterA. P. (1968). A Generalization of Bayesian Inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 30, 205–247.
  • DudewiczE. J. (1980). Ranking (Ordering) and Selection: An Overview of How to Select the Best. Technometrics, 22, 113–119.
  • DudewiczE. J and LeeY. J. (1986). Robust Selection Procedures Based on Vector Ranks. Metrica, 33, 47–63.
  • DyerJ. and SarinR. (1979). Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions. Operations Research, 27, 810–822.
  • EllsbergD. (1961). Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.
  • FishburnP. C. (1964). Decision and Value Theory. Wiley, New York.
  • FishburnP. C. (1983). Ellsberg Revisited: A New Look at Comparative Probability. Annals of Statistics, 11, 1047–1059.
  • FishburnP. C. (1986a). The Axioms of Subjective Probability (with comments), Statistical Science, 1, 335–358.
  • FishburnP. C. (1986b). Interval Models for Comparative Probability on Finite Sets. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 221–242.
  • FoxJ. (1994). On the Necessity of Probability: Reasons to Believe and Grounds for Doubt. In WrightG. and AytonP (Eds.) Subjective Probability, Wiley, Chichester.
  • GenestC and ZidekJ. V. (1986). Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and Annotated Bibliography (with comments), Statistical Science, 1, 114–148.
  • GoodI. J. (1950). Probability and the Weighting of Evidence, Griffin, London.
  • HeckermanD. and BreeseJ. S. (1995). Causal Independence for Probability Assessment and Inference Using Bayesian Networks. Microsoft Research Technical Report TR-94–08, Redmond, Washington.
  • HogarthR. M. (1975). Cognitive Processes an the Assessment of Probability Distributions (with comments), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 271–294.
  • KanalL. N. and LemmerJ.(Eds) (1986). Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  • KeeneyR. L. and RaiffaH. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York.
  • KolmogorovA. N. (1933). Foundations of Probability, Berlin (original German edition), Chelsea, New York, 1950 (English edition).
  • KoopmanB. O. (1940). The Axioms and Algebra of Intuitive Probability. Annals of Mathematics, 41, 269–292.
  • KrantzD. H., LuceR. D., SuppesP. and TverskyA. (1971). Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I, Academic Press, New York.
  • LindleyD. V. (1987). The Probability Approach to Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems. Statistical Science, 2, 17–24.
  • LindleyD. V. (1994). Foundations. In WrightG. and AytonP. (Eds.) Subjective Probability, Wiley, Chichester.
  • LuceR. D. (1992). Where Does Subjective Expected Utility Fail Descriptively?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 5–27.
  • MengersenK. (1993). And the Winner Is …: Statistical Selection for Excellence in Quality Management. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 13, 177–193.
  • MunierB. R. (1995). Complexity and Strategic Decision under Uncertainty. How Can We Adapt the Theory? In MunierB. R. (Ed), Markets, Risk and Money, Kluwer, Dordrecht (original French version published in 1986).
  • PascalB. (1654). Oeuvres Complétes de Pascal, MesnardJean (Ed.), Bibliothéque Europénne-Desclés de Brower.
  • RamseyF. P. (1931) The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays. Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York. The Humanities Press, 1950.
  • SavageL. J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.
  • ScottD. and SuppesP. (1958). Foundational Aspects of Theories of Measurement. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23, 113–128.
  • ShaferG. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • ShaferG. (1981). Constructive Probability. Synthese, 48,1–60.
  • ShaferG. (1987). Probability Judgment in Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems Statistical Science, 2, 3–16.
  • SlovicP. and TverskyA. (1974). Who Accepts Savage's Axiom?. Behavioral Science, 19, 368–373.
  • SmithG. F., BensonP. G. and CurleyS. P. (1991). Belief, Knowledge, and Uncertainty: A Cognitive Perspective on Subjective Probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 291–321.
  • SuppesP. (1974). The Measurement of Belief. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 36, 160–175.
  • SuppesP. and WinetM. (1955). An Axiomatization of Utility Based on the Notion of Utility Differences. Management Science, 1, 259–270.
  • TverskyA. (1969). Intransitivity of Preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48.
  • TverskyA. and KahnemanD. (1982). Causal Schemas in Judgments under Uncertainty. In KahnemanD., SlovicP. and TverskyA. (Eds.) Judgments under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • TverskyA. and KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 186, 1124–1131.
  • TverskyA. and KahnemanD. (1983). Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction fallacy in Probability Judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
  • TverskyA. and KoehlerD. J. (1994). Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547–567.
  • WallstenT. S. and BudescuD. V. (1983), Encoding Subjective Probabilities: A Psychological and Psychometric Review. Management Science, 29, 151–173.
  • WolfowitzJ. (1962). Bayesian Inference and Axioms of Consistent Decision. Econometrica, 30, 470–479.
  • WrightG. and AytonP., (Eds.) (1994). Subjective Probability, Wiley, Chichester.
  • YilmazM. R. (1997). In Defense of a Constructive, Information-Based Approach to Decision Theory. Theory and Decision, 43, 21–44.
  • YilmazM. R. and ChatterjeeS. (1994). An Information-Based Model for Subjective Probability. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 14, 103–138.
  • ZadehL. A. (1983). The Role of Fuzzy Logic in the Management of Uncertainty in Expert Systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 199–227.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.