The Viable Smart Product Model: Designing Products that Undergo Disruptive Transformations

References

• Alberdi, A., A. Aztiria, and A. Basarab. 2016. Towards an automatic early stress recognition system for office environments based on multimodal measurements: a review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 59:49–75. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, W. R. 1952. Design for a brain: the origin of adaptive behaviour. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Awolusi, I., E. Marks, and M. Hallowell. 2018. Wearable technology for personalized construction safety monitoring and trending: review of applicable devices. Automation in Construction 85 (October): :96–106. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azar, E. R., and V. R. Kamat. 2017. Earthmoving equipment automation: a review of technical advances and future outlook. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 22 (May 2016): :247–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri, A., B. Boudreau-Trudel, and A. Saâdeddine. 2018. Occupational health and safety in the Industry 4.0 era: a cause for major concern? Safety Science 109 (August 2017): :403–11. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barata, J., and P. R. Cunha. 2019a. Safety Is the New Black: The Increasing Role of Wearables in Occupational Health and Safety in Construction. In Business Information Systems, ed. By W. Abramowicz and R. Corchuelo, vol. 353, 526–537. BIS 2019. LNBIP.
   Google Scholar
• Barata, J., and P. R. Cunha. 2019b. In Search for a Viable Smart Product Model. In BITA 2019 Proceedings (in press). Seville, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Batista, L., S. Davis-Poynter, I. Ng, and R. Maull. 2017. Servitization through outcome-based contract – a systems perspective from the defence industry. International Journal of Production Economics 192 (October):133–43. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauk, S., A. Schmeink, and J. Colomer. 2016. An RFID model for improving workers’ safety at the seaport in transitional environment. Transport 33 (2):353–63. doi:10.3846/16484142.2016.1233512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, S. 1979. The heart of enterprise. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, J., A. Hinze, and C. Griffiths. 2019. Investigating real-time monitoring of fatigue indicators of new zealand forestry workers. Accident: Analysis and Prevention 126:122–41. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardin, O., Trentesaux, D. A. Thomas, P. Castagna, T. Berger, and H. Bril, El-Haouzi. 2017. Coupling predictive scheduling and reactive control in manufacturing hybrid control architectures: state of the art and future challenges. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28 (7):1503–17. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1139-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B., S. Hwang, and S. Hyun Lee. 2017. What drives construction workers’ acceptance of wearable technologies in the workplace?: Indoor localization and wearable health devices for occupational safety and health. Automation in Construction 84 (August):31–41. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S., D. Haftor, and N. Pashkevich. 2018. Smart product-service systems (Smart PSS) in industrial firms: a literature review. Procedia CIRP 73:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.333.
   Google Scholar
• Coertze, J., and R. Von Solms. 2015. Towards a Cybernetics-Based Communication Framework for IT Governance. Proceedings of the 48th HICSS, 4595–4606.
   Google Scholar
• Dallasega, P., E. Rauch, and C. Linder. 2018. Industry 4.0 as an enabler of proximity for construction supply chains: a systematic literature review. Computers in Industry 99 (August 2017): :205–25. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, O., and A. Akcamete. 2019. Detecting falls-from-height with wearable sensors and reducing consequences of occupational fall accidents leveraging IoT. In Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering 207–14. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_25
   Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. 1990. The viable system model. Systemic Practice and Action Research 3(3):219–221.
   Google Scholar
• Espejo, R. 1999. Aspects of identity, cohesion, citizenship and performance in recursive organisations. Kybernetes 28 (6/7):640–58. doi:10.1108/03684929910282935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo, R., and G. Dominici. 2017. Cybernetics of value cocreation for product development. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 34 (1):24–40. doi:10.1002/sres.2392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat 2016. “Accidents at Work Statistics.” 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Accidents_at_work_statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., J. Teizer, and E. Maks. 2014. A framework for developing an as-built virtual environment to advance training of crane operators. Construction Research Congress 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, A. D. 2018. Qualitative research and the challenges of complexity. In Computer supported qualitative research. ISQR 2017. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, ed. A. Costa et al., vol. 621. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. 1953. Experiments in field settings. In Research methods in behavioral sciences, ed. L Festinger and D Katz, 98–135. New York, NY: Dryden Press, 101.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Y. Yu, and M. Skitmore. 2017. Visualization technology-based construction safety management: a review. Automation in Construction 73:135–44. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Y. Yu, T. Xiang, H. Li, and D. Zhang. 2017. The availability of wearable-device-based physical data for the measurement of construction workers’ psychological status on site: from the perspective of safety management. Automation in Construction 82 :207. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, V. 2018. Application of sensor technology for warning unsafe conditions from moving objects above construction workers. ICEI Proceedings 69–74. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8448690
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, C., A., Thomas, S. Belmokhta, and 2011. R, and R. Pannequin. A Viable System Model for Product-Driven Systems. Proceedings of the IESM, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28 (1):75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildbr, S., and S. Bodhanya. 2015. Guidance on applying the viable system model. Kybernetes 44(2):186–201. doi:10.1108/K-01-2014-0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoof, C. V. 2013. Addressing the healthcare cost dilemma by managing health instead of managing illness an opportunity for wireless wearable sensors. 5th international workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces Proceedings, 9–9.
   Google Scholar
• Huygh, T., and S. De Haes. 2019. Investigating IT governance through the viable system model. Information Systems Management 36 (2):168–92. doi:10.1080/10580530.2019.1589672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huygh, T., and 2018., and S. De Haes. Using the viable system model to study IT governance dynamics: evidence from a single case study. Proceedings of the 51st HICSS 9.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S., and S. Hyun Lee. 2017. Wristband-Type wearable health devices to measure construction workers’ physical demands. Automation in Construction 83 (June):330–40. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S., J. Oh Seo, H. Jebelli, and S. Hyun Lee. 2016. Feasibility analysis of heart rate monitoring of construction workers using a photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor embedded in a Wristband-Type activity tracker. Automation in Construction 71 (Part 2):372–81. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanan, R., O. Elhassan, and R. Bensalem. 2018. An IoT-based autonomous system for workers’ safety in construction sites with real-time alarming, monitoring, and positioning strategies. Automation in Construction 88 (November 2016):73–86. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakurel, J., H. Melkas, and J. Porras. 2018. Tapping into the wearable device revolution in the work environment: a systematic review. Information Technology & People 31 (3):791–818. doi:10.1108/ITP-03-2017-0076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakurel, J., S., Pöysä, and, and J. Porras. 2017. The use of wearable devices in the workplace – a systematic literature review. In Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good, ed. O. Gaggi et al., vol. 195, 284–294. GOODTECHS 2016. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., H. Kim, and H. Kim. 2017. Image-based construction hazard avoidance system using augmented reality in wearable device. Automation in Construction 83:390–403. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., and N. P. Melville. 2019. Digital innovation: a review and synthesis. Information Systems Journal 29 (1):200–23. doi:10.1111/isj.12193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortuem, G., F. Kawsar, V. Sundramoorthy, and D. Fitton. 2010. Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Computing 14 (1):44–51. doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritzler, M., A. Tenfält, M. Bäckman, and F. Michahelles. 2015. Wearable technology as a solution for workplace safety. In MUM Proceedings, pp. 213–217. Linz, Austria. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2836041.2836062.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R., A. Junus, W. Cheng, X. Li, and L. Lam. 2017. IoT application in construction and civil engineering works. In CSCI Proceedings, 1320–25, Las Vegas, NV, USA. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8560992
   Google Scholar
• Le, Q. T., H. C. Pham, A. Pedro, C. S. Park, and S. Korea. 2015. Application of wearable devices for real time construction safety management. IPC Proceedings, 28–31, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chansik_Park3/publication/291973303_Applicability_of_Wearable_Devices_for_Real-time_Construction_Safety_Management/links/58d49ccc92851c44d4416924/Applicability-of-Wearable-Devices-for-Real-time-Construction-Safety-Management.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., M. Thomas, and R. Baskerville. 2015. Going back to basics in design science: from the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact. Information Systems Journal 25 (1):5–21. doi:10.1111/isj.12054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., J. Cho, S. Ham, T. Lee, G. Lee, S. Heon Yun, and H. Jun Yang. 2012. A BIM- and sensor-based tower crane navigation system for blind lifts. Automation in Construction 26:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W., K. Yu Lin, E. Seto, and G. C. Migliaccio. 2017. Wearable sensors for monitoring on-duty and off-duty worker physiological status and activities in construction. Automation in Construction 83 (June): :341–53. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., M. Pharr, and G. A. Salvatore. 2017. Lab-on-skin: a review of flexible and stretchable electronics for wearable health monitoring. ACS Nano 11 (10):9614–35. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b04898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., E. Orduna-Malea, and E. Delgado López-Cózar. 2018. Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, web of science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 116 (3):2175–88. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., E. Orduna-Malea, E. Delgado López-Cózar, and A. Martín-Martín. 2018. Google Scholar, web of science, and scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics 12 (4):1160–77. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler, T., and J. Wulf. 2019. Physiolytics at the workplace: affordances and constraints of wearables use from an employee’s perspective. Information Systems Journal 29 (1):245–273. doi:10.1111/isj.12205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science 24 (9):934–48. doi:10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, J., R. Pérez-Rodríguez, V. Borja, P. K. Wright, and A. Molina. 2017. Sensing, smart and sustainable product development (S3 Product) reference framework. International Journal of Production Research 7543 :1–22. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1401237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, N. D., R. Akhavian, and A. H. Behzadan. 2017. Ergonomic analysis of construction worker’s body postures using wearable mobile sensors. Applied Ergonomics 62 :107–17. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, Y., W. Lu, K. Chen, G. Q. Huang, and C. Anumba. 2016. Smart construction objects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 30 (4):04015070. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, Y., W. Lu, F. Xue, D. Liu, K. Chen, D. Fang, and C. Anumba. 2019. Towards the ‘third wave’: an sco-enabled occupational health and safety management system for construction. Safety Science 111 (July 2018):213–23. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novales, A., M. Mocker, and D. Simonovich. 2016. IT-enriched ‘digitized’ products: building blocks and challenges. AMCIS Proceedings, San Diego, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. W., X. Yang, Y. K. Cho, and J. Seo. 2017. Improving dynamic proximity sensing and processing for smart work-zone safety. Automation in Construction 84 (June): :111–20. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3):45–78. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 2004. The science of the unknowable: stafford beer’s cybernetic informatics. Kybernetes 33 (3/4):499–521. doi:10.1108/03684920410523535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and J. Heppelmann. 2017. Why every organization needs an augmented reality strategy. Harvard Business Review 6 :46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and J. E. Heppelmann. 2015. How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review 114 :96–112.
   Google Scholar
• Raviv, G., B. Fishbain, and A. Shapira. 2017. Analyzing risk factors in crane-related near-miss and accident reports. Safety Science 91 :192–205. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, R., A. Perlman, and R. Barak. 2013. Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Construction Management and Economics 31 (9):1005–17. doi:10.1080/01446193.2013.828844.
   Google Scholar
• Schall, M. C., R. F. Sesek, and L. A. Cavuoto. 2018. Barriers to the adoption of wearable sensors in the workplace: a survey of occupational safety and health professionals. Human Factors 60 (3):351–62. doi:10.1177/0018720817753907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, M. 2006. Design for viable organizations. Kybernetes 35 (7/8):955–66. doi:10.1108/03684920610675012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, M., and C. Scheef. 2016. A test of the viable system model: theoretical claim vs. empirical evidence. Cybernetics and Systems 47 (7):544–69. doi:10.1080/01969722.2016.1209375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, J., S. Han, S. Lee, and H. Kim. 2015. Computer vision techniques for construction safety and health monitoring. Advanced Engineering Informatics 29 (2):239–51. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2015.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. R., B. Snowdon, C. P. Holland, P. Kawalek, and B. Warboys. 2004. The viable systems model applied to a smart network: the case of the UK electricity market. Journal of Information Technology 19(4):270–80. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, I. J. 2015. Factors that affect safety of tower crane installation/dismantling in construction industry. Safety Science 72 :379–90. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczerbicki, E., N., Thanh Nguyen, and, and C. Zanni-Merk. 2019. Adding smartness to systems with case studies and applications. Cybernetics and Systems 50 (2):79–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teizer, J. 2015. Wearable, wireless identification sensing platform: self-monitoring alert and reporting technology for hazard avoidance and training (SmartHat). Journal of Information Technology in Construction 20 (December): :295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teizer, J., B. S. Allread, C. E. Fullerton, and J. Hinze. 2010. Autonomous pro-active real-time construction worker and equipment operator proximity safety alert system. Automation in Construction 19 (5):630–40. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., S. Sousan, M. Tatum, X. Liu, C. Zuidema, M. Fitzpatrick, K. Koehler, and T. Peters. 2018. Low-cost, distributed environmental monitors for factory worker health. Sensors 18 (5):1411. doi:10.3390/s18051411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management 14 (3):207–22. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.,G., Zhang, Q. Yan, B. Shen, L. Yuan, and L. Liu. 2007. Development of a Novel Black Box for Tower Crane Based on an ARM-Based Embedded System. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, ICAL 2007, 82–87, Jinan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Webster 2019. Merriam Webster Dictionary. 2019. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., and R. T. Watson. 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare the future. MIS Quarterly 26 (2):xiii–xxiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X., H. Li, A. R. Li, and H. Zhang. 2017. Wearable IMU-based real-time motion warning system for construction workers’ musculoskeletal disorders prevention. Automation in Construction 74 (2017):2–11. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y. 2010. Digitalization and innovation (IIR Working Papers). Hitotsubashi University Repository. http://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/rs/handle/10086/18789
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y.,. O. Henfridsson, and K. Lyytinen. 2010. The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research 21 (4):724–35. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X. J., J. B. Zeng, and H. Zhang. 2013. Research of intelligent monitoring system of tower crane based on RFID. Advanced Materials Research 706–708 :990–4. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.990.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, D., H. Lv, J. Han, and Q. Wei. 2014. A practical application combining wireless sensor networks and internet of things: safety management system for tower crane groups. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 14 (8):13794–814. doi:10.3390/s140813794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., and L. Y. Ding. 2017. Safety barrier warning system for underground construction sites using internet-of-things technologies. Automation in Construction 83 :372. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z.,. Y. M. Goh, and Q. Li. 2015. Overview and analysis of safety management studies in the construction industry. Safety Science 72 (2015):337–50. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, E., H. Bril, E. L. Haouzi, P. Thomas, A. Thomas, and M. Noyel. 2017. A hybrid manufacturing control based on smart lots in a disrupted industrial context. Paper presented at the 20th IFAC World Congress 9585–9, Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar