Centralization Measures for Social Networks

References

• Barnes, J. A., and F. Harary. 1983. Graph theory in network analysis. Social Networks 5 (2):235–44. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(83)90026-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavelas, A. 1948. A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organization 7 (3):16–30. doi: 10.17730/humo.7.3.f4033344851gl053.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, A. 1950. Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22 (6):725–30. doi: 10.1121/1.1906679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blythe, J., C. McGrath, and D. Krackhardt. 1996. The effect of graph layout on inference from social network data. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 1027:40–51. doi: 10.1007/bfb0021789.
   Google Scholar
• Bollobás, B. 1998. Modern graph theory. Vol. 184. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0619-4.
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, U. 2001. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25 (2):163–77. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danilowicz, C., and N. T. Nguyen. 2000. Consensus-based methods for restoring consistency of replicated data. Advances in Soft Computing, Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems'2000, ed. Klopotek, 325–36. Heidelberg:Physica.
   Google Scholar
• Das, K., S. Samanta, and M. Pal. 2018. Study on centrality measures in social networks: A survey. In Social network analysis and mining. Vol. 8, Issue 1, 13. Wien: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/s13278-018-0493-2.
   Google Scholar
• Dehmer, M. 2010. Structural analysis of complex networks. Boston: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Duong, T. H., N. T. Nguyen, H. B. Truong, and V. H. Nguyen. 2015. A collaborative algorithm for semantic video annotation using a consensus-based social network analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 42 (1):246–58. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgin, D. J., and D. P. Carter. 2019. Administrative (de)centralization, performance equity, and outcome achievement in rural contexts: An empirical study of U.S. child welfare systems. Governance 32 (1):23–43. doi: 10.1111/gove.12343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Khatib, R., K. Fogel, and T. Jandik. 2015. CEO network centrality and merger performance. Journal of Financial Economics 116 (2):349–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1 (3):215–39. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C., S. P. Borgatti, and D. R. White. 1991. Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks 13 (2):141–54. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(91)90017-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., G. Wang, Z. A. Bhuiyan, and J. Wu. 2016. Understanding graph-based trust evaluation in online social networks: Methodologies and challenges. ACM Computing Surveys 49 (1):1–35. doi: 10.1145/2906151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsak, M., L. K. Gallos, S. Havlin, F. Liljeros, L. Muchnik, H. E. Stanley, and H. A. Makse. 2010. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics 6 (11):888–93. doi: 10.1038/nphys1746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschützki, D., K. A. Lehmann, L. Peeters, S. Richter, D. Tenfelde-Podehl, and O. Zlotowski. 2005. Centrality indices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3418 LNCS, 16–61. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-31955-9_3.
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., E. C. So, and C. C. Y. Wang. 2013. Boardroom centrality and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 55 (2–3):225–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, H. J. 1951. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 46 (1):38–50. doi: 10.1037/h0057189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. G., Z. M. Ren, and Q. Guo. 2013. Ranking the spreading influence in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 392 (18):4154–9. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.04.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., M. Tang, T. Zhou, and Y. Do. 2016. Identify influential spreaders in complex networks, the role of neighborhood. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 452:289–98. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, I. P., H. Zhu, and A. Zaheer. 2017. Centralization of intragroup equity ties and performance of business group affiliates. Strategic Management Journal 38 (5):1082–100. doi: 10.1002/smj.2542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mianowska, B., and N. T. Nguyen. 2013. Tuning user profiles based on analyzing dynamic preference in document retrieval systems. Multimedia Tools and Applications 65 (1):93–118. doi: 10.1007/s11042-012-1145-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T. 2000. Using consensus methods for solving conflicts of data in distributed systems. Sofsem 2000, LNCS 1963:411–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T. 2002. Consensus systems for conflict solving in distributed systems. Information Sciences 147 (1–4):91–122. doi: 10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00260-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T. 2008. Advanced methods for inconsistent knowledge management. In Advanced methods for inconsistent knowledge management. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-889-0.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T., and J. Sobecki. 2003. Using consensus methods to construct adaptive interfaces in multimodal web-based systems. Universal Access in the Information Society 2 (4):342–58. doi: 10.1007/s10209-003-0050-1.
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. 1974. On the centrality in a graph. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 15 (4):332–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1974.tb00598.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palak, R., and K. Wojtkiewicz. 2020. The time efficient centralisation measure for social networks assessment. In The 33th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering & Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, ed. H. Fujita, J. Sasaki, P. Fournier-Viger, and M. Ali, 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, J., P. Silva, R. Duarte, K. Davids, and J. Garganta. 2017. Team sports performance analysed through the lens of social network theory: Implications for research and practice. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 47 (9):1689–96. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0695-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat, Y. 2009. Closeness centrality extended to unconnected graphs: The harmonic centrality index. In Application of Social Network Analysis (ASNA), Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Sabidussi, G. 1966. The centrality of a graph. Psychometrika 31 (4):581–603. doi: 10.1007/BF02289527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, A., and C. J. Zhang. 2013. Ranking spreaders by decomposing complex networks. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics 377 (14):1031–5. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.02.039.
   Google Scholar