Enhanced Localization Model in Wireless Sensor Network Using Self Adaptive-Barnacles Mating Optimization

References

• Ahmadi, Y., N. Neda, and R. Ghazizadeh. 2016. Range free localization in wireless sensor networks for homogeneous and non-homogeneous environment. IEEE Sensors Journal 16 (22):8018–26. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2016.2606508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambati, L. S., K. Narukonda, G. R. Bojja, and D. Bishop. 2020. Factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence in organizations-from an employee's perspective. Adoption of AI in organization from employee perspective.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, F. S., Y. Pang, W.-J. Zhou, W. Jiang, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, and C. Qian. 2016. Coverage-based lossy node localization for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 16 (11):4648–56. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2016.2541159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, S. J., and K. V. Santhosh. 2022. A localization and deployment model for wireless sensor networks using arithmetic optimization algorithm. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 15 (3):1473–85. doi:10.1007/s12083-022-01302-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binu, D., and B. S. Kariyappa. 2019. RideNN: A new rider optimization algorithm-based neural network for fault diagnosis in analog circuits. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 68 (1):2–26. doi:10.1109/TIM.2018.2836058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, X., C. Zhao, S. He, P. Cheng, and J. Zhang. 2017. Distributed algorithms to compute Walrasian equilibrium in mobile crowdsensing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 64 (5):4048–57. doi:10.1109/TIE.2016.2645138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghari, P. M., R. Shahbazian, and S. A. Ghorashi. 2016. wireless sensor network localization in harsh environments using SDP relaxation. IEEE Communications Letters 20 (1):137–40. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2498179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingabire, W., H. Larijani, and R. M. Gibson. 2021. LoRa RSSI based outdoor localization in an urban area using random neural networks. Intelligent Computing 284:1032–43. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80126-7_72
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, N., S. Bansal, and R. K. Bansal. 2017. Energy conscious scheduling with controlled threshold for precedence-constrained tasks on heterogeneous clusters. Concurrent Engineering 25 (3):276–86. doi:10.1177/1063293X16679001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulaib, A. R., R. M. Shubair, M. A. A. Qutayri, and J. W. P. Ng. 2011. An overview of localization techniques for wireless sensor networks. Paper presented at 2011 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, Abu Dhabi, 167–72.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J.-P., and G.-Z. Lu. 2018. Dynamic cooperative localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing 9 (4):949–58.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., and Liu, F. 2019. A hybrid convolutional and recurrent neural network for hippocampus analysis in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 323:108–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N., J.-S. Pan, J. Wang, and T.-T. Nguyen. 2019. An adaptation multi-group quasi-affine transformation evolutionary algorithm for global optimization and its application in node localization in wireless sensor networks. Intelligent Systems in Sensor Networks and Internet of Things 19 (19):4112.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., S. Zhang, and K. Bu. 2016. A locality-based range-free localization algorithm for anisotropic wireless sensor networks. Telecommunication Systems 62 (1):3–13. doi:10.1007/s11235-015-9978-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., A. Liu, Y. Li, Z. Li, Y. Choi, H. Sekiya, and J. Li. 2017. APMD: A fast data transmission protocol with reliability guarantee for pervasive sensing data communication. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 41:413–35. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., K. Liu, and M. Li. 2010. Passive diagnosis for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 18 (4):1132–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H., X. Xu, Y. Wang, D. Qin, and W. Zhuang. 2018. Research on relative coordinate localization of nodes based on topology control. Journal of Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing 9 (2):432–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mamta, M., N. Goyal, and M. Nain. 2022. Optimization Techniques Analysis in Underwater Wireless Sensor Network 107 (1):5403. doi:10.1149/10701.5403ecst.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Y. Liu, X. Gao, and H. Zhang. 2014. A new bio-inspired algorithm: Chicken swarm optimization. Paper presented the International Conference in Swarm Intelligence, Advances in Swarm Intelligence, 86–94. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nain, M., N. Goyal, L. K. Awasthi, and A. Malik. 2022. A range based node localization scheme with hybrid optimization for underwater wireless sensor network. International Journal of Communication System 35 (10):e5147. doi:10.1002/dac.5147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nain, M., and N. Goyal. 2022. Energy efficient localization through node mobility and propagation delay prediction in underwater wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications 122 (3):2667–85. doi:10.1007/s11277-021-09024-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niculescu, D., and B. Nath. 2003. DV based positioning in ad hoc networks. Telecommunication Systems 22 (1/4):267–80. doi:10.1023/A:1023403323460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, A. 2010. Localization algorithms in wireless sensor networks: Current approaches and future challenges. Network Protocols and Algorithms 2 (1):45–74. doi:10.5296/npa.v2i1.279.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. E. H., and A. J. Chipperfield. 2010. Simplifying particle swarm optimization. Applied Soft Computing 10 (2):618–28. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purusothaman, P., and M. Gunasekaran. 2020. Adaptive neural network with hybrid optimization oriented localization in wireless sensor network: A multi-objective model. International Journal of Wavelets, Multi Resolution and Information Processing 19 (1):2050064. doi:10.1142/S0219691320500642.
   Google Scholar
• Rajakumar, B. R. 2013a. Impact of static and adaptive mutation techniques on genetic algorithm. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems 10 (1):11–22. doi:10.3233/HIS-120161.
   Google Scholar
• Rajakumar, B. R. 2013b. Static and adaptive mutation techniques for genetic algorithm: A systematic comparative analysis. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering 8 (2):180–93. doi:10.1504/IJCSE.2013.053087.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, D, and M. Dutta. 2022. A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems. Journal of Big Data 9 (1):59. doi:10.1186/s40537-022-00592-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. C., P. R. Perea, E. Sifuentes, and R. G. Landaeta. 2016. A recursive shortest path routing algorithm with application for wireless sensor network localization. IEEE Sensors Journal 16 (11):4631–7. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2016.2543680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad, F., T. R. Sheltami, and E. M. Shakshuki. 2016. Multi-objective optimization for a reliable localization scheme in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Communications and Networks 18 (5):796–805. doi:10.1109/JCN.2016.000108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shangguan, L., Z. Yang, A. X. Liu, Z. Zhou, and Y. Liu. 2017. STPP: Spatial-temporal phase profiling-based method for relative RFID tag localization. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 25 (1):596–609. doi:10.1109/TNET.2016.2590996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaiman, M. H., Z. Mustaffa, M. M. Saari, and H. Daniyal. 2020. Barnacles mating optimizer: A new bio-inspired algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 87:103330. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swamy, S. M., B. R. Rajakumar, and I. R. Valarmathi. 2013. Design of hybrid wind and photovoltaic power system using opposition-based genetic algorithm with Cauchy mutation. Paper presented at the IET Chennai Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Intelligent Systems (SEISCON 2013), Chennai, India. doi:10.1049/ic.2013.0361.
   Google Scholar
• Tabjula, J. L., S. Kanakambaran, S. Kalyani, P. Rajagopal, and B. Srinivasan. 2021. Outlier analysis for defect detection using sparse sampling in guided wave structural health monitoring. Structural Control and Health Monitering 28 (3):e2690. doi:10.1002/stc.2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabjula, J., S. Kalyani, P. Rajagopal, and B. Srinivasan. 2022. Statistics-based baseline-free approach for rapid inspection of delamination in composite structures using ultrasonic guided waves. Structural Health Monitoring 21 (6). doi:10.1177/14759217211073335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashistha, A., and C. L. Law. 2020. E-DTDOA based localization for wireless sensor networks with clock drift compensation. IEEE Sensors Journal 20 (5):2648–58. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2953811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F.-J., H.-C. Hsu, C.-C. Shen, and Y.-C. Tseng. 2016. Range-free mobile actor relocation in a two-tiered wireless sensor and actor network. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 12 (2):1–40. doi:10.1145/2903145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, B., L. Chen, Q. Xiao, and M. Li. 2010. Reliable anchor-based sensor localization in irregular areas. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 9 (1):60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., W. Liu, Z. Li, L. Chen, and R. Wang. 2018. Noise-tolerant wireless sensor networks localization via multinorms regularized matrix completion. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 67 (3):2409–19. doi:10.1109/TVT.2017.2771805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., Z. Wang, N. Ye, R. Wang, and X. Li. 2018. One more tag enables fine-grained RFID localization and tracking. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 26 (1):161–74. doi:10.1109/TNET.2017.2766526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Q., B. Xiao, J. Cao, and J. Wang. 2010. Multihop range-free localization in anisotropic wireless sensor networks: a pattern-driven scheme. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 9 (11):1592–607. doi:10.1109/TMC.2010.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Y. Xu, X. Li, and C. Chen. 2011. A loss inference algorithm for wireless sensor networks to improve data reliability of digital ecosystems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 58 (6):2126–37. doi:10.1109/TIE.2011.2106096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaarour, N., N. Hakem, and N. Kandil. 2022. Localization context-aware models for wireless sensor network. Emerging Trends in Wireless Sensor Networks. doi:10.5772/intechopen.103893.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Z. Li, B. Hao, and J. Shi. 2019. Sensor selection for TDOA-based localization in wireless sensor networks with non-line-of-sight condition. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 68 (10):9935–50. doi:10.1109/TVT.2019.2936110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. J., R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. 2002. Residual energy scan for monitoring sensor networks. Paper presented at the 2002 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Record. WCNC 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8609), Orlando, FL, USA, 356–362.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, K., H. Wang, H. Li, W. Xiang, L. Lei, J. Qiao, and X. S. Shen. 2017. Energy-efficient localization and tracking of mobile devices in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 66 (3):2714–26. doi:10.1109/TVT.2016.2584104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., S. Yang, N. Jin, L. Wang, M. L. Wymore, and D. Qiao. 2016. DiVA: Distributed Voronoi-based acoustic source localization with wireless sensor networks. Paper presented at the IEEE INFOCOM 2016 – The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, San Francisco, CA, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., F. Xiao, L. Sun, R. Wang, and P. Yang. 2017. R-TTWD: Robust device-free through-the-wall detection of moving human with WiFi. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 35 (5):1090–103. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2017.2679578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar