Instantiation, Actualization, and Absence: The Continuation and Safeguarding of Katie Paterson’s Future Library (2014–2114)

References

• Butler, Judith. 2020. The Force of Non-Violence: An Ethico-Political Bind. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Castriota, Brian. 2019. “Securing a Futurity: Artwork Identity and Authenticity in the Conservation of Contemporary Art.” PhD diss., University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Castriota, Brian. 2021. “Variants of Concern: Authenticity, Conservation, and the Type-Token Distinction.” Studies in Conservation. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2021.1974237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCSDS (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). 2012. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Recommended Practice CCSDS 650.0-M-2, Magenta Book no. 2. Washington DC: CCSDS Secretariat. https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Stephen. 2001. Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, David. 2010. “Multiple Instances and Multiple ‘Instances’.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (4): 411–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. (1968) 1994. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, Julian. (2012) 2015. “Performing Works of Music Authentically.” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3): 485–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez Rubio, Fernando. 2014. “Preserving the Unpreservable: Docile and Unruly Objects at MoMA.” Theory and Society 43, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9233-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, Tina. 2009. “White Walls: Installations, Absence, Iteration and Difference.” In Conservation Principles, Dilemmas and Uncomfortable Truths, edited by Alison Richmond and Alison Bracker, 229–240. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Nelson. 1984. Of Mind and Other Matters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Rebecca. 2014. “Identifying and Pursuing Authenticity in Contemporary Art.” In Authenticity and Replication: The “Real Thing” in Art and Conservation, edited by Erma Hermens and Frances Lennard, 95–107. London: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Heinich, Natalie. 2014. “Practices of Contemporary Art: A Pragmatic Approach to a New Artistic Paradigm.” In Artistic Practices, Social Interactions, and Cultural Dynamics, edited by Tasos Zembylas, 32–43. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hölling, Hanna. 2015. Zen for Film. New York: Bard Graduate Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hölling, Hanna. 2016. “The Aesthetics of Change: On the Relative Durations of the Impermanent and Critical Thinking in Conservation.” In Authenticity in Transition: Changing Practices in Art Making and Conservation, edited by Erma Hermens, and Frances Robertson, 13–24. London: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hölling, Hanna. 2017. Paik’s Virtual Archive: Time, Change, and Materiality in Media Art. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irivin, Sherri. 2005. “The Artist’s Sanction in Contemporary Art.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (4): 315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin, Sherri. 2013. “Installation Art and Performance: A Shared Ontology.” In Art and Abstract Objects, edited by Christy Mag Uidhir, 242–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jadzińska, Monika. 2016. “Artists’ Experiments with New Materials: How to Preserve Intent and Matter.” In Authenticity in Transition: Changing Practices in Contemporary Art Making and Conservation, edited by Erma Hermens, and Frances Robertson, 189–196. London: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Amelia. 1997. “‘Presence’ in Absentia: Experiencing Performance as Documentation.” Art Journal 56 (4): 11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kania, Andrew. 2013. “Platonism vs. Nominalism in Contemporary Musical Ontology.” In Art and Abstract Objects, edited by Christy Mag Uidhir, 197–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenson, Pip. 2004. “The Management of Display Equipment in Time-Based Media Installations.” In Modern Art, New Museums: Contributions to the Bilbao Congress, September 13–17, 2004, edited by Ashok Roy and Perry Smith, 49–53. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (IIC).
   Google Scholar
• Laurenson, Pip. 2006. “Authenticity, Change and Loss in the Conservation of Time-Based Media Installations: A Conceptual Framework for Traditional Fine Art Conservation.” Tate Papers 6. http://www.tate.org.uk/download/file/fid/7401.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenson, Pip. 2016. “Practice as Research: Unfolding the Objects of Contemporary Art Conservation”. Inaugural lecture delivered at Maastricht University, March 18. https://youtu.be/rEZzsg3OzJg.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenson, Pip, and Vivian van Saaze. 2014. “Collecting Performance-Based Art: New Challenges and Shifting Perspectives.” In Performativity in the Gallery. Staging Interactive Encounters, edited by Outi Remes, Laura MacCulloch, and Marika Leino, 27–41. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Louise, Acatia Finbow, and Hélia Marçal. 2019. “Developing a Strategy for the Conservation of Performance-Based Artworks at Tate.” Journal of the Institute of Conservation 42 (2): 114–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2019.1604396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepecki, André. 2010. “The Body as Archive: Will to Re-Enact and the Afterlives of Dances.” Dance Research Journal 42 (2): 28–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marçal, Hélia Pereira. 2017. “Conservation in an Era of Participation.” Journal of the Institute of Conservation 40 (2): 97–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2017.1319872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Corina. 2009. “Scoring the Work: Documenting Practice and Performance in Variable Media Art.” Leonardo 42 (1): 59–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2009.42.1.59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël de Tilly, Ariane. 2011. “Scripting Artworks: Studying the Socialization of Editioned Video and Film Installations.” PhD diss., University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, Katie. 2016. Katie Paterson. Edited by Jonty Tarbuck and Jon Bewley. Newcastle upon Tyne: Locus+ Commercial Union House.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles Sanders. (1906) 1933. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Joanna. 2015. “Reporting Iterations: A Documentation Model for Time-Based Media Art.” Edited by Lúcia Almeida Matos, Rita Macedo, and Gunnar Heydenreich. Revista de História Da Arte 4: 168–79. http://revistaharte.fcsh.unl.pt/rhaw4/RHAw4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Real, William A. 2001. “Toward Guidelines for Practice in the Preservation and Documentation of Technology-Based Installation Art.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 40 (3): 211–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rød, Arve. 2015. “A New Spring.” In Margaret Atwood – 2014 – Future Library. Oslo: Future Library Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Rinehart, Richard. 2004. “A System of Formal Notation for Scoring Works of Digital and Variable Media Art.” In Proceedings of the American Institute of Conservation Digital Media Group, 1–25. Portland, OR: AIC.
   Google Scholar
• Saaze, Vivian van. 2013. Installation Art and the Museum: Presentation and Conservation of Changing Artworks. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, Chris. 2011. “Musical Materialism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1): 13–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vall, Renée van de. 2015a. “Documenting Dilemmas: On the Relevance of Ethically Ambiguous Cases.” Edited by Lúcia Almeida Matos, Rita Macedo, and Gunnar Heydenreich. Revista de História Da Arte 4: 7–17. http://revistaharte.fcsh.unl.pt/rhaw4/RHAw4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vall, Renée van de. 2015b. “The Devil and the Details: The Ontology of Contemporary Art in Conservation Theory and Practice.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (3): 285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, Bill. 1999. “Permanent Impermanence.” In Mortality Immortality?: The Legacy of 20th-Century Art, edited by Miguel Angel Corzo, 85–94. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wegen, D. H. van. 1999. “Between Fetish and Score: The Position of the Curator of Contemporary Art.” In Modern Art: Who Cares? An Interdisciplinary Research Project and an International Symposium on the Conservation of Modern and Contemporary Art, edited by IJsbrand Hummelen, and Dionne Sillé, 201–209. Amsterdam: The Foundation for the Conservation of Modern Art and the Netherlands Institute for Cultural Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, James. 2013. Gilles Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition: A Critical Introduction and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar