Potential Pesticide Contamination in Repatriated Artifacts in African Museums: The Need for the Adoption of Safety Protocols for Access and Use of Hazardous Artifacts

References

• African Union. 2006. Charter for African Cultural Renaissance. African Union, 6th Ordinary Session of the Assembly, Khartoum, Sudan, January 24. https://au.int/en/treaties/charter-african-cultural-renaissance
   Google Scholar
• Bakare, L. 2021. “University of Aberdeen to Return Pillaged Benin Bronze to Nigeria.” The Guardian. March 25.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. E. 1992. Solving Museum Insect Problems: Chemical Control. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, W. J. 2006. “Repatriation of a Great Zimbabwe stone bird.” In Proceedings of the Society of Africanist Archaeologists 2006 Conference in Calgary, June 22-26; Art and its Contexts. Ann Arbor, MI: SAfA.
   Google Scholar
• Falkenberg, R. 2015. “Do We Have a Chemistry Problem?” In Blessing and Curse – Biocides: Application, Analysis, Evaluation, edited by A. Lang, and J. Zimmer, 4–5. Berlin: Germany Historical Museum Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gofswald, U. 2009. “ICOM Statement on Reclaiming Cultural Property.” Museum International 61 (1-2): 87–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall, R. A., D. Hacklin, N. Ladas, and M. McCubbin. 2013. “Profiling Hazardous Substances in the Museum Victoria State Collection.” AICCM Contexts for Conservation National Conference –, Adelaide, October 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, O., and S. Krug. 2015. “Consequences of Historical Pest Control in Archives and Museums.” In Blessing and Curse – Biocides: Application, Analysis, Evaluation, edited by A. Lang, and J. Zimmer, 23–27. Berlin: Germany Historical Museum Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hawks, C. 2001. “Historical Survey of the Sources of Contamination of Ethnographic Materials in Museum Collections.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. The Contamination of Museum Materials and the Repatriation Process for Native California - Collection Forum, Vol. 16 (1-2): 2–11. Proceedings of a Working Conference at the San Francisco State University, September 29-October 1, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, T. E. 2001. “Chemical Contamination of Repatriated Native Californian NAGPRA Materials: Principles of Risk Assessment for Acute and Chronic Health Effects.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. The Contamination of Museum Materials and the Repatriation Process for Native California – Collection Forum, Vol. 16 (1 -2): 44-53. Proceedings of a Working Conference at the San Francisco State University, September 29-October 1, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A., and J. Zimmer. 2015. “Manufacturing-Related Ingredient or Applied Biocide.” In Blessing and Curse – Biocides: Application, Analysis, Evaluation, edited by A. Lang, and J. Zimmer, 32–47. Berlin: Germany Historical Museum Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loma’omvaya, M. 2001. “NAGPRA Artefact Repatriation and Pesticide Contamination: The Hopi Experience.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. Preservation of Native American Historical Natural History Collections Contaminated with Pesticide Residues - Collection Forum. Vol. 17, 30–37. Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the National Conservation Training Center (NCTC), Shepherdstown, West Virginia, April 6-9.
   Google Scholar
• Matenga, E. 2011. The Soapstone Birds of Great Zimbabwe: Archaeological Heritage, Religion and Politics in Postcolonial Zimbabwe and the Return of Cultural Property. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• McGreevy, N. 2021. “Germany Will Return Benin Bronzes to Nigeria in 2022.” Smithsonian Magazine. April 19.
   Google Scholar
• Munjeri, D. 2009. “The Reunification of a National Symbol.” Museum International 61 (1-2): 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nason, J. D. 2001. “A New Challenge, A New Opportunity.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the National Conservation Training Center (NCTC), Shepherdstown, West Virginia. April 6–9, 2001. Collection Forum. Volume 17. pp 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nason, J. D. 2001b. “Dangerous Collections!: Pesticides on Museum Materials.” History News, Vol. 56, Number 3 (Summer 2001), pp. 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• National Archives of Zimbabwe Act [Chapter 25:06] National Gallery of Zimbabwe Act [Chapter 25:09] National Heritage Resources Act Number 25 of 1999. n.d. National Museums and Monuments Act [Chapter 25:11].
   Google Scholar
• Odegaard, N., and A. Sadongei. 2001. “The Issue of Pesticide on Native American Cultural Objects: A Report on Conservation and Education Activities at University of Arizona.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. Proceedings of a Working Conference at the San Francisco State University. 29 September–1 October 2000. Collection Forum. Volume 16, Number 1–2, pp. 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio, A. M. 2001. “Tribal Repatriation of Sacred Objects: Public Health Issues.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the National Conservation Training Center (NCTC), Shepherdstown, West Virginia. April 6–9, 2001. Collection Forum. Volume 17, pp. 82–92.
   Google Scholar
• Purewal, V. 2001. “The Identification of Four Persistent and Hazardous Residues Present on Historical Plant Collections Housed Within the National Museum and Galleries of Wales.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. The Contamination of Museum Materials and the Repatriation Process for Native California – Collection Forum, Vol. 16 (1-2): 77. Proceedings of a Working Conference at the San Francisco State University, September 29-October 1, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, C., A. L. Bandle, and A. Chechi. 2013. Case Great Zimbabwe Bird – Zimbabwe and Prussia Cultural Heritage Foundation, Germany. Geneva: Art-Law Centre- University of Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Sarr, F., and B. Savoy. 2018. Rapport sur la restitution du patrimoine culturel africain. Vers une nouvelle éthique relationnelle [The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage: Toward a New Relational Ethics]. Translated by Drew S. Burk. Paris: Philippe Rey/Seuil. http://restitutionreport2018.com
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, O. 2001. “Insecticide Contamination at the National Museum of Denmark: A Case Study.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. The Contamination of Museum Materials and the Repatriation Process for Native California - Collection Forum, Vol. 16 (1-2): 77. Proceedings of a Working Conference at the San Francisco State University, September 29-October 1, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Shemang, B. 2021. “Nigeria Welcomes Germany’s Decision to Return Looted Benin Bronzes.” DW Akademie. April 30.
   Google Scholar
• Sirois, P. J. 2001. “The Analysis of Museum Objects for the Presence of Arsenic and Mercury: Non- Destructive Analysis and Sample Analysis.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. The Contamination of Museum Materials and the Repatriation Process for Native California - Collection Forum, Vol. 16 (1-2): 65-75. Proceedings of a Working Conference at the San Francisco State University, September 29-October 1, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sirois, P. J., J. S. Johnson, A. Shugar, J. Poulin, and O. Madden. 2008. Pesticide Contamination: Working Together to Find a Common Solution: The Current State of Affairs. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stellenbosch University Museum. 2021. The Restitution of African Knowledge and Objects: An Academic Discussion. May 25 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Southern Africa Development Community. 2001. SADC Protocol on Culture, Information, and Sport. Article 13 and 14, 10-11. August 21-22, 2001. https://www.sadc.int/document/protocol-culture-information-and-sport-2001
   Google Scholar
• Tsosie, R. 2001. “Contaminated Collections: An Overview of the Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues.” In Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. Preservation of Native American Historical Natural History Collections Contaminated with Pesticide Residues - Collection Forum. Vol. 17, 14–29. Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the National Conservation Training Center (NCTC), Shepherdstown, West Virginia, April 6-9.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization). 1970. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/operational_guidelines_en_final_final_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization). 1986. Guidelines for the Use of the “Standard Form Concerning Requests for Return or Restitution.” Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation.
   Google Scholar
• UNIDROIT (International Institute for the Unification of Private Law). 1995. UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, Rome, June 24. https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/cultural-property/1995-convention
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2009. Proceedings of Athens International Conference on the Return of Cultural Objects to their Countries of Origin, Athens, 2008. Museum International, Vol. 61 (1-2). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000182992
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 1977. Restitution of Works of Art to Countries Victims of Expropriation: Report of the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/659958?ln=en
   Google Scholar