Individual and Collective Empowerment in Online Communities: The Mediating Role of Communicative Interaction in Web Forums

REFERENCES

• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., K.Y. A. McKenna, and S. Tal. 2008. E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 24: 1776–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, A., M. Boniel-Nissim, and J. Suler. 2008. Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior 24: 1867–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, S.J., and B.S. Krueger. 2006. Online interactions and social capital: Distinguishing between new and existing ties. Social Science Computer Review 24: 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L.W., H.T. Welser, D. Cosley, and J.M. DeGroot. 2011. Self-governance through group discussion in Wikipedia measuring deliberation in online groups. Small Group Research 42: 595–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A.L. 2008. Testing a model of sense of virtual community. Computers in Human Behavior 24: 2107–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A.L., and L.M. Markus. 2004. The experienced “sense” of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. Data Base for Advanced in Information Systems 35: 64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, A., and L.H. Staples. 2004. Empowerment: The point of view of consumers. Families in Society 85: 270–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K.A. 1989. Structural equation models with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, G. 2010. Voluntary contribution to public goods in mutual-help forums: Reciprocity or group attachment? Socio-Economic Review 8: 709–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, H., and N.S. Coulson. 2007. Accessing dental anxiety online support groups: An exploratory qualitative study of motives and experiences. Patient Education and Counseling 66: 263–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C.M. K., and M.K. O. Lee. 2009. Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: Model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science 35: 279–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavis, D.M., and A. Wandersman 1990. Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology 18: 55–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools, W., W. Van den Noortgate, and P. Onghena. 2008. ML-DEs: Multilevel design efficiency using simulation. Behavior Research Methods 40: 236–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2004. The Habermasian public sphere: A specification of the idealized conditions of democratic communication. Studies in Social and Political Thought 10: 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., E. Hargittai, R.W. Neuman, and J.P. Robinson. 2001. The Internet's implications for society. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 307–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, J., and S. Reicher. 2005. Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology 35: 35–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernback, J. 2007. Beyond the diluted community concept: a symbolic interactionst perspective on online social relations. New Media & Society 9(1): 49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. 2004. Communicative power in Habermas's theory of democracy. European Journal of Political Theory 3: 433–54.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. 2014. Media between power and empowerment: Can we emerge from this dilemma? The Information Society 30(3): 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, L.A. 2001. Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community. Communication Research 28: 358–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., S. Burkhalter, and L.W. Black. 2007. Do juries deliberate? A study of deliberation, individual difference, and group member satisfaction at a municipal courthouse. Small Group Research 38(3): 337–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., and L.W. Black. 2008. Public deliberation as an organizing principle for political communication research. Journal of Public Deliberation 4(1): article 3. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol4/iss1/art3 (accessed January 2, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., and T. Witschge. 2003. In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussion. Communications 28: 173–204.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action—Reason and the rationalisation of society (Vol. I). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. 2008. The digital reproduction of inequality. In Social stratification, ed. D. Grusky, 936–44. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, M.H. 2006. Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. Journal of Community Psychology 34: 523–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ip, E.J., M.J. Barnett, M.J. Tenerowicz, and P.J. Perry. 2010. The touro 12-step: A systematic guide to optimizing survey research with online discussion boards. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12: e16. . http://www.jmir.org/2010/2/e16/ (accessed January 2, 2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J.L. 2002. Public spheres on the Internet—Anarchic or government sponsored: A comparison. Scandinavian Political Studies 26: 349–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K.G., and D. Sörbom. 2004. LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R.P. 1988. The problem of power in Habermas. Human Studies 11: 361–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogovšek, T., and A. Ferligoj. 2004. The quality of measurement of personal support subnetworks. Quality & Quantity 38, 517–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollock, P. 1999. The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In Communities in cyberspace, ed. M. Smith, and P. Kollock, 220–39. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, L. 2009. User-generated content on the Internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society 11: 1327–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozar Manfreda, K., M. Bosnjak, J. Berzelak, I. Haas, and V. Vehovar. 2008. Web surveys versus other survey modes—A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research 50: 79–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney-Krichmar, D., and J. Preece. 2005. A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability and community dynamics in an online health community. Transactions on Human–Computer Interaction 12: 201–32.
   Google Scholar
• Masterson, S., and S. Owen. 2006. Mental health service user's social and individual empowerment: Using theories of power to elucidate far-reaching strategies. Journal of Mental Health 15: 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Matzat, U. 2009. A theory of relational signals in online groups. New Media & Society 11: 375–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzat, U. 2010. Reducing problems of sociability in online communities: Integrating online communication with offline interaction. American Behavioral Scientist 53: 1170–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, P.K. H., and N.S. Coulson. 2010. Empowering processes in online support groups among people living with HIV/AIDS: A comparative analysis of ‘lurkers’ and ‘posters’. Computers in Human Behavior 26: 1183–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, M.E. 1999. Communication and community empowerment. Peace Review 11: 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, N.A., J.B. Lowe, M.L. Aquilino, and J.E. Schnider. 2005. Linking social cohesion and interactional empowerment: Support and new implications for theory. Journal of Community Psychology 33: 233–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrič, G. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring the social uses of the Internet: The case of personal websites. The Information Society 22:291–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrič, G. 2014. Perceived Quality of Conversations in Online Communities: Conceptual Framework, Scale Development, and Empirical Validation. . Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17(2): 82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., R. Spears, and M. Lea. 1998. Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE effect of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 25: 689–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. 1987. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology 15: 121–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riger, S. 1993. What's wrong with empowerment? American Journal of Community Psychology 27: 279–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. 2008. Strategy versus understanding: How orientations towards political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research 35: 452–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. 2006. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. London, UK: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., and R. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, P.W. 2000. Intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: Implication for theory. Journal of Community Psychology 28(1): 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, P.W., and J. Hughey. 1995. Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. American Journal of Community Psychology 23: 729–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, P.W., C.B. Jackson, and N.A. Peterson. 2001. The relationship between social cohesion and empowerment: Support and new implications for theory. Health Education and Behavior 28: 716–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, L.H. 1990. Powerful ideas about empowerment. Administration in Social Work 14: 29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. 2011. Usage of information and communication technologies in households and by individuals, detailed data, Slovenia, 2011—final data. Ljubljana, Slovenia: SURS. . http://www.stat.si/eng/ (accessed January 2, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M.R., A. Bächtiger, M. Spörndli, and J. Steiner. 2003. Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics 1: 21–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tanis, M. 2008. Health-related online forums: What's the big attraction? Journal of Health Communication 13(7): 698–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Uden-Kraan, C.F., C.H. C. Drossaert, E. Taal, B.R. Shaw, E.R. Seydel, and M.A. F. J. van de Laar. 2008. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis and fibromyalgia. Qualitative Health Research 18: 405–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J.A., and J. Gilliom. 1998. Up from the streets: Handler and the ambiguities of empowerment and dependency. Law & Social Inquiry 23(1): 203–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, H. 2005. A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities. New Media & Society 7: 701–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. 2007. The impact of time online: Social capital and cyberbalkanization. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10(3): 398–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong, D. 2009. Habermas's communicative comncepts of power. Philosophy Today 53: 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. 2002. Social support within an on-line cancer community: An assessment of emotional support perceptions of advantages and disadvantages and motives for using the community from a communication perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research 30: 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., and J. Street. 2007. Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums. New Media & Society 9: 849–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y.C., D. Cosley, T.W. Welser, L. Xia, and G. Gay. 2009. The diffusion of a task recommendation system to facilitate contributions to an online community. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15: 32–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M.A. 1995. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology 23: 581–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M.A. 2000 Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In Handbook of community psychology, ed. J. Rappaport and E. Seidman, 43–63. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar