Another Wood Between the Worlds? Regimes of Worth and the Making of Meanings in the Work of Archivists

REFERENCES

• Anthony, D. 2006. Beyond description: An exploration of experienced archivists' knowledge and searching skills. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Ataman, B. 2009. Archives mean money: How to make the most of archives for public relations purposes—The Yapi Kredi bank example. American Archivist 72(1): 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. 2007. Taking the road less travelled by: The future of the archive and records management profession in the digital age. Journal of the Society of Archivists 28(2): 117–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00379810701607777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. 2008. Managing the crowd: Rethinking records management for the Web 2.0 world. London, UK: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. 2011. Measuring the impact of records management: Data and discussion from the UK higher education sector. Records Management Journal 21(1): 46–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125107
   Google Scholar
• Barry, R. 2010. Opinion piece—Electronic records: Now and then. Records Management Journal 20(1): 157–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064304
   Google Scholar
• Battley, B. 2013. Finding aids in context: Using records continuum and diffusion of innovations models to interpret descriptive choices. Archives and Manuscripts 41(2): 129–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.793164
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. 2012. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science 12(4): 377–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
   Google Scholar
• Belovari, S. 2013. Professional minutia and their consequences: Provenance, context, original identification, and anthropology at the Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois. Archival Science 13(2–3): 143–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9202-0
   Google Scholar
• Blouin, F. X., ed. 2007. Archives, documentation, and institutions of social memory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot 2006. On justification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borglund, E., and L.-M. Öberg 2006. Operational use of records. Paper presented at the Paradigms Politics Paradoxes, 29th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Borgman, C. L. 2007. Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Both, A. 2010. Un travail de fonds pour l’éternité: Anthropologie comparée des pratiques archivistiques: enquête sur le terrain des archives municipales, départementales et diplomatiques. Paris, France: Direction générale des patrimoines, Département du pilotage de la recherche et de la politique scientifique.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. 2005. Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. 2010. The archive. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 7(2): 212–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14791421003775733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., K. Baker, F. Millerand, and D. Ribes. 2010. Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In The international handbook of Internet research, ed. J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, and M. Allen, 97–117. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmeier, J. 2010. After the archive: Remapping memory. Culture & Psychology 16(1): 5–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X09353212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothman, B. 2002. Afterglow: Conceptions of record and evidence in archival discourse. Archival Science 2(3): 311–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02435627
   Google Scholar
• Bruebach, N. 2003. Archival science in Germany—Traditions, developments and perspectives. Archival Science 3(4): 379–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-004-3420-4
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, M. K. 1991. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5): 351–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2004. Informationalism, networks, and the network society: A theoretical blueprint. In The network society: A cross-cultural perspective, 3–45. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, M. 2010. Hannah Arendt's world: Bureaucracy, documentation, and banal evil. Archivaria, 70: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, T., W. Hagenmaier, and J. Levine Knies. 2013. Toward a notion of the archive of the future: Impressions of practice by librarians, archivists, and digital humanities scholars. Library Quarterly 83(2): 112–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/669550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convery, N. 2010. Information management, records management, knowledge management: The place of archives in a digital age. In The future of archives and recordkeeping: A reader, ed. J. Hill, 191–212. London, UK: Facet
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. 1997. What is past is prologue: A history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria 43(1): 17–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. 2001. Archival science and postmodernism: New formulations for old concepts. Archival Science 1(1): 3–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. 2011. The archive(s) is a foreign country: Historians, archivists, and the changing archival landscape. American Archivist 74(2): 600–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. 2013. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: Four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science 13(2–3): 95–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. J. 2000. Closing an era: Historical perspectives on modern archives and records management. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. J. 2001. Managing records as evidence and information. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, K. 2010. Ways of seeing: Contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal 20(1): 41–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036224
   Google Scholar
• Delmas, B. 1992. Bilan et perspectives de I´archivistique francaise au seuil du troisieme millennaire. In Archival science on the threshold of the year 2000, ed. O. Bucci, 81–109. Ancona, Italy: University of Macerata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, L. 2000. Scientific, industrial, and cultural heritage: A shared approach: A research framework for digital libraries, museums and archives. Ariadne 22. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/dempsey (accessed November 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1995. Mal d´archive: Une impression freudienne. Paris, France: Galilee.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. 2010. Origins: Evolving ideas about the principle of provenance. In Currents in archival thinking, ed. T. Eastwood and H. MacNeil, 23–43. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Duchein, M. 1983. Theoretical principles and practical problems of respect des fonds in archival science. Archivaria 16(1): 64–82.
   Google Scholar
• Duchein, M. 1992. The history of European archives and the development of the archival profession in Europe. American Archivist 55(1): 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, W., E. Yakel, and H. Tibbo. 2013. Archival reference knowledge. American Archivist 76(1): 68–94.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, A. 2006. Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: Getting the conversation started. Archival Science 6(1): 109–29.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, L. 1998. Diplomatics: New uses for an old science. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, L. 1999. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal 9(3): 149–71.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, L. 2001. The impact of digital technology on archival science. Archival Science 1(1): 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, L. 2010. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal 20(1): 78–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ebeling, K., and S. Günzel, ed. 2009. Archivologie: theorien des archivs in philosophie, medien und künsten. Berlin, Germany: Kadmos.
   Google Scholar
• Ekbia, H. R., and T. P. Evans 2009. Regimes of information: Land use, management, and policy. The Information Society 25(5): 328–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, W. 2008. Sorlet från arkiven. Ordning ur oordning. Göteborg, Sweden: Glänta.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. J. A. 2001. The records continuum model in context and its implications for archival practice. Journal of the Society of Archivists 22(1): 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foscarini, F. 2009. Function-based records classification systems. An exploratory study of records management practices in central banks. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2002. The archeology of knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2005. Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2008. Toward a sociological theory of information. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland, A., and S. McKemmish. 2004. Building an infrastructure for archival research. Archival Science 4(3): 149–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland-Swetland, A. J. 2000. Enduring paradigm, new opportunities: The value of the archival perspective in the digital environment (Technical report 89). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gracy, K. 2004. Documenting communities of practice: Making the case for archival ethnography. Archival Science 4(3): 335–65.
   Google Scholar
• Gracy, K. F. 2001. The imperative to preserve: Competing definitions of value in the world of film preservation. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. 2011. Work´s intimacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Henttonen, P. 2007. Records, rules and speech acts: Archival principles and preservation of speech acts (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis). Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Hickerson, H. 2001. Ten challenges for the archival profession. American Archivist 64(1): 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsjärvi, S., and H. Hurme 1995. Teemahaastattelu. Helsinki, Finland: Yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, B., and S. Weller 2011. Archive time (Guest editors´ introduction). Comparative Critical Studies 8(2–3): 133–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huvila, I. 2008. Participatory archive: Towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science 8(1): 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, R. C. 2004. The future of archives and manuscripts. OCLC Systems & Services 20 (1): 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Johare, R., and M. N. Masrek 2011. Malaysian archival heritage at risk? A survey of archivists’ knowledge and skills in managing electronic records. Library Review 60(8): 685–711.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, V., and C. Williams 2011. Using archives to inform contemporary policy debates: History into policy? Journal of the Society of Archivists 32(2): 287–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, J., and R. Rinehart 2011. Personal ontological information responsibility. Library Review 60(3): 230–45.
   Google Scholar
• Keough, B., and M. Wolfe 2012. Moving the archivist closer to the creator: Implementing integrated archival policies for born digital photography at colleges and universities. Journal of Archival Organization 10(1): 69–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2012.681266
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaar, E. 2001. Ethnologie archivistique. La Gazette des Archives, 192: 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and H. Lee 2009. Digital-age trends and perspectives in Korean university archives. The Electronic Library 27(3): 426–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640470910966871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körmendy, L. 2007. Changes in archives’ philosophy and functions at the turn of the 20th/21st centuries. Archival Science 7(2): 167–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-007-9052-8
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M. G. 2010. It makes history alive for them: The role of archivists and special collections librarians in instructing undergraduates. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 36(5): 401–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, V., and J. Hill 2010. Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? Situating the archive and archivists. In The future of archives and recordkeeping: A reader, ed. J. Hill, 3–22. London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, M., and J. Silva 2012. Dual archivist/librarians: Balancing the benefits and challenges of diverse responsibilities. College & Research Libraries 73(2): 164–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl-222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoff, M. 2004. Theories of the archive from across the disciplines. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 4(1): 9–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manžuch, Z. 2009. Archives, libraries and museums as communicators of memory in the European Union projects. Information Research 14(2). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ851918.pdf (accessed November 20, 2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKemmish, S. 2001. Placing records continuum theory and practice. Archival Science 1(4): 333–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02438901
   Google Scholar
• McKemmish, S., A. Gilliland-Swetland, and E. Ketelaar 2005. “Communities of memory”: Pluralising archival research and education agendas. Archives and Manuscripts 33: 146–74.
   Google Scholar
• McKemmish, S., L. Iacovino, L. Russell, and M., Castan 2012. Editors´ introduction to keeping cultures alive: Archives and indigenous human rights. Archival Science 12: 93–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9170-9
   Google Scholar
• Nahl, D., and D. Bilal, ed. 2007. Information and emotion: The emergent affective paradigm in information behavior research and theory. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, E. 2003 A Nordic archival tradition. Archival Science 3(2): 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02435652
   Google Scholar
• Prelinger, R. 2010 We are the new archivists: Artisans, activists, cinephiles, citizens. Paper presented at Reimagining the Archive conference, Los Angeles, CA, November 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, F. 2001. Archival science and changes in the paradigm. Archival Science 1(3): 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y. 2010. Credibility and cognitive authority of information. In Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, 3rd ed, ed. M. J. Bates and M. N. Maack, 1337–44. Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. 2007. Abdication or empowerment? User involvement in library, archives and records services. Australian Library Journal 56(1): 30–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2007.10722348
   Google Scholar
• Sahlén, T. 2005. ABM—utveckling. In Om ABM: En antologi om samverkan mellan arkiv, bibliotek och museer, ed. M. Molin, and B. Wittgren, 50–58. Härnosand, Sweden: ABM Resurs: Länsmuseet Västernorrland.
   Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, T. R. 2003. Modern archives. Principles and techniques. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists. Originally published 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, K. 2004. Recordkeeping in the production of scientific knowledge: An ethnographic study. Archival Science 4(3): 367–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-2600-1
   Google Scholar
• Shilton, K., and R. Srinivasan 2008. Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections. Archivaria 63: 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22(11): 1359–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. 2008. The online archivist: A positive approach to the digital information age. In What are archives? Cultural and theoretical perspectives: A reader, ed. L. Craven, 89–106. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, S. 2010. Michel Aglietta and regulation theory. In Critical theory for library and information science: Exploring the social from across the disciplines, ed. G. J. Leckie, L. M. Given, and J. Buschman, 1–13. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A. 2007. The use of records—A literature review. Archives & Social Studies 1(1): 623–653.
   Google Scholar
• Tamblé, D. 2001. Archival theory in Italy today. Archival Science 1(1): 83–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02435640
   Google Scholar
• Tanackoviae, S., and B. Badurina 2008. Collaboration as a wave of future: Exploring experiences from Croatian archives. Library Hi Tech 26(4): 557–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830810920897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theimer, K. ed. 2011. A different kind of Web: New connections between archives and our users. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, T. 2001. A first introduction to archival science. Archival Science 1(4): 373–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02438903
   Google Scholar
• Upward, F. 1997. Structuring the records continuum, Part two: Structuration theory and recordkeeping. Archives and Manuscripts 25(1): 10–35.
   Google Scholar
• Usherwood, B., K. Wilson, and J. Bryson 2005. Relevant repositories of public knowledge?: Libraries, museums and archives in “the information age.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 37(2): 89–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000605055357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtonen, M. R. 2005. Tapaustutkimus poliisin esitutkinnan dokumentoinnista: Asiakirjahallinnan näkökulma [A case study of documentation in pre-trial investigation: A records management view]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, C. 1989. The sociology of emotions and flight attendants: Hochschild's managed heart. Theory, Culture & Society 6(1): 95–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327689006001005
   Google Scholar
• Yakel, E. 2001. The social construction of accountability: Radiologists and their record-keeping practices. The Information Society 17(4): 233–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/019722401753330832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakel, E. 2011. Balancing archival authority with encouraging authentic voices to engage with records. In A different kind of Web: New connections between archives and our users, ed. K. Theimer, 75–101. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, G. 2007. Concepts of record (1): Evidence, information, and persistent representations. American Archivist 70(2): 315–43.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, G. 2010. Representing the act: Records and speech act theory. Journal of the Society of Archivists 31(2): 95–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2010.506782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. 2012. Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representations. Knowledge Organization 39(5): 332–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipsane, H. 2009. Lifelong learning through heritage and art. In The Routledge international handbook of lifelong learning, ed. P. Jarvis, 173–82. London, UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar