387
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Getting Information Systems to Interact: The Social Fact Character of “Object” Clarity as a Factor in Designing Information Systems

&
Pages 175-192 | Received 15 Jun 2013, Accepted 15 Jul 2014, Published online: 19 Mar 2015

REFERENCES

  • Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words, ed. J. O. Urmson. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brandom, R. 2008. Between saying and doing: Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, J. S. 2002. An epistemological perspective on organizations. Keynote address to the Third European Conference on Organizational Knowledge Learning and Capabilities, Athens, Greece, April 6.
  • Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. 2000. The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Descombes, V. 1979. Modern French philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Durkheim, É. 1933. The division of labor in society, trans. G. Simpson. Chicago, IL: Free Press. Originally published in 1893.
  • Durkheim, É. 1995. The elementary forms of the religious life. Chicago, IL: Free Press. Originally published in 1912.
  • Evans, R. 2001. Applying machine learning toward an automatic classification of IT. Lit Linguist Computing 16(1): 45–57.
  • Garfinkel, H. 1956. Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology 61(5): 420–24.
  • Garfinkel, H. 1963. A conception of and experiments with “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions. In Motivation and social interaction, ed. O. J. Harvey, 187–238. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
  • Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Garfinkel, H. 2006. Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. Originally written in 1948.
  • Garfinkel, H. 2008. Toward a sociological theory of information. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. Originally written in 1952.
  • Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Chicago, IL: Free Press.
  • Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, ed. P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, 4158. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Heath, C., and P. Luff. 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hughes, J. A., D. Randall, and D. Shapiro. 1993. From ethnographic record to system design: Some experiences from the field. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1(3): 123–41.
  • IBM. 2007. The IBM Data Governance Council Maturity Model: Building a road map for effective data governance. The IBM Data Governance Council, October 2007. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/whitepapers/LO11960-USEN-00_10.12.pdf
  • Jacob, E. K. 2004. Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference. Library Trends (52)3: 515–40.
  • James, W. 1907. Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lewis, G. A., S. Comella-Dorda, P. Place, D. Plakosh, and R. C. Seacord. 2001. An enterprise information system data architecture guide. Technical Report, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-2001-TR-018 and ESC-TR-2001-018. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/01.reports/pdf/01tr018.pdf
  • Lin, Y. Procter, R. Randall, J. Rooksby, and W. Sharrock. 2007. Ontology building as practical work: Lessons from CSCW. In Proceedings of the UK e-science all hands meeting 2007, 10–13 September, Nottingham, UK, ed. S. J. Cox. http://www.allhands.org.uk/2007/proceedings/proceedings/proceedings.pdf (accessed Noveember 14, 2014).
  • Luff, P., J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath. 2000. Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mann, D. and J. Brooks. 2010. Information standards and their use: Implications for design patterns (MITRE Technical Report, document number 100094). https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/pdf/10_2335.pdf
  • Mann, D., and J. Brooks. 2011. The relationship between human and machine-oriented standards and the impact to enterprise system engineering [Report]. MITRE Corporation. http://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/pdf/10_1789.pdf (accessed November 14, 2014).
  • Mead, G. H. 1924. Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mills, C. W. 1940. Situated action and the vocabulary of motives. American Journal of Sociology 5: 904–13.
  • Obrst, L. 2003. Ontologies for semantically interoperable systems. In CIKM ’03: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 366–9. New York, NY: Academy of Management.
  • Obrst, L. 2010. Ontological architectures. In Theory and applications of ontology, ed. M. Healy, R. Poli and A. Kameas, 27–66. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Orlikowski, W. J. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies 28(9): 1435–48.
  • Orr, J., 1996. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Pomerantz, A. 1975. Second assessments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Rawls, A. W. 1987. The interaction order sui generis: Goffman's contribution to social theory. Sociological Theory 5(2): 136–49.
  • Rawls, A. W. 2000. Race as an interaction order phenomena: W.E.B. Du Bois's “Double Consciousness” thesis revisited. Sociological Theory 18(2): 239–72.
  • Rawls, A. W. 2008. Harold Garfinkel, ethnomethodology and workplace studies. Organization Studies 29(5): 701–32.
  • Rawls, A. W. 2012. Durkheim's theory of modernity: Self-regulating practices as constitutive orders of social & moral facts. Journal of Classical Sociology 12(3): 479–512.
  • Rawls, A. W. and G. David. 2006. Accountably other: Trust, reciprocity and exclusion in a context of situated practice. Human Studies 28(4): 469–97.
  • Rawls, A. W., D. Mann, A. C. Garcia, G. C. David, and M. Burton. 2009. Simple enumerations: Ethnomethodology and MITRE information assurance data standards. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa 2(1): 77–106.
  • Rawls, A. W., D. Mann, and A. Jeffrey. 2013. Locating the modern sacred. Journal of Classical Sociology 13(4).
  • Rawls, J. 1955. Two concepts of rules. Philosophical Review 64(1): 3–32.
  • Rosenfeld, L., and P. Morville. 2002. Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale Web sites. Cambridge, UK: O'Reilly Media.
  • Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1), introduction by E. A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2), introduction by E. A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language (50)4: 696–735.
  • Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schneider, U. 2007. Coping with the concept of knowledge. Management Learning 38(5): 613–33.
  • Searle, J. 1964. How to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’. Philosophical Review 73(1): 43–58.
  • Searle, J. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Suchman, L. 2007. Human machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Terasaki, A. K. 2004. Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. G. H. Lerner, 171–223. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Originally published in 1982.
  • Watson, R. 2009. Constitutive practices and Garfinkel's notion of trust: Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology 9(4): 475–99.
  • Weick, K. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Xie, J. 2013. The structuralist twisting of Durkheimian sociology: Symbolism, moral reality, and the social subject. Journal of Classical Sociology 13(4). doi:10.1177/1468795X13497141

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.