Awkwardness of becoming a boundary object: Mangle and materialities of reports, documentation data, and the archaeological work

References

• Akhavan, P., and A. Pezeshkan. 2014. Knowledge management critical failure factors: A multi-case study. VINE 44 (1):22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Amréus, L., and M. Jansén. 2015. Utvecklad och mer effektiv hantering av fynd från arkeologiska undersökningar Återrapportering av regeringsuppdrag. Stockholm, Sweden: Riksantikvarieämbetet and Statens Historiska museer.
   Google Scholar
• ARKDIS. 2013–2017. Archaeology in the Digital Society (ARKDIS) project. http://arkdis-project.blogspot.se (accessed March 23, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., and C. Neylon. 2012. A vision for open archaeology. World Archaeology 44 (4):479–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M. 1996. Practices of reading and writing: The constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociology of Health & Illness 18 (4):499–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., and G. Bowker. 1997. The multiple bodies of the medical record: Toward a sociology of an artifact. Sociological Quarterly 38 (3):513–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. 2006. Documents of documents: Scientists´ names and scientific claims. In Documents: Artifacts of modern knowledge, ed. A. Riles, 127–57. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R. J., and R. V. Tenkasi. 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science 6 (4):350–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgman, C. L. 2015. If data sharing is the answer, what is the question? ERCIM News 100:15–16. http://ercim-news.ercim.eu/en100/special/if-data-sharing-is-the-answer-what-is-the-question (accessed March 23, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson, L., B. Petersson, and I. Huvila. 2015. Information policy for (digital) information in archaeology: Current state and suggestions for development. Internet Archaeology 40.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, M. K. 2012. Obsolescence in subject description. Journal of Documentation 68 (2):154–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, P. 2012. Water and technoscientific state formation in California. Social Studies of Science 42 (4):489–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, M. L. 2014. Engineering obsolescence. Ethnography Matters, April 21. http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/04/21/engineering_obsolescence (accessed March 23, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Craven, L. 2008. From the Archivist´s cardigan to the very dead sheep: What are archives? What are archivists? What do they do? In What are archives? Cultural and theoretical perspectives: A reader, ed. L. Craven, 7–30. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, M., B. Marshall, and P. Kawalek. 2014. IT artifact bias: How exogenous predilections influence organizational information system paradigms. International Journal of Information Management 34 (4):427–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2004. On time, space, and action nets. Organization 11 (6):773–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J., and D. Pontille. 2012. Workers of writing, materials of information. Revue d´anthropologie des connaissances 6 (1):a–s.
   Google Scholar
• Doolin, B., and L. McLeod. 2012. Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. European Journal of Information Systems 21 (5):570–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drewett, P. 1999. Field archaeology an introduction. London, UK: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, A. 2003. Close reading: An introduction. In Close reading: A reader, ed. F. Lentricchia and A. DuBois, 1–40. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, M. 2006. Ethnographies of archaeological practice: Cultural encounters, material transformations. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., G. Bowker, S. Jackson, and R. Williams. 2009. Introduction: An agenda for infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5):364–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. N. L., and R. H. Moore. 2014. The use of PDF/A in digital archives: A case study from archaeology. International Journal of Digital Curation 9 (2):123–38.
   Google Scholar
• Faniel, I., E. Kansa, S. Whitcher Kansa, J. Barrera-Gomez, and E. Yakel. 2013. The challenges of digging data: A study of context in archaeological data reuse. Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 295–304. JCDL ’13. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, R., G. Currie, and G. Martin. 2010. Team work in context: Institutional mediation in the public-service professional bureaucracy. Organization Studies 31 (8):1069–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, K. R. 2006. Boundary objects with agency: A method for studying the design use interface. Information Society 22 (2):77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinn, A. 2010. “An attack on professionalism and scholarship?”: Democratising archives and the production of knowledge. Ariadne 62. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue62/flinn (accessed March 23, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Francke, H. 2008. (Re)creations of scholarly journals: Document and information architecture in open access journals. Doctoral dissertation, Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University College of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Frohmann, B. 2004. Documentation redux: Prolegomenon to (another) philosophy of information. Library Trends 52 (3):387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, L., M. R. Reich, and T. Fujisaki. 2002. A partnership for ivermectin: Social worlds and boundary objects. In Public–private partnerships for public health, ed. M. R. Reich, 87–113. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, J., and S. Talja. 2007. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science 33 (2):115–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasson, S. 2006. A genealogical study of boundary-spanning IS design. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (1):26–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, UK: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gurstein, M. B. 2011. Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday 16 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, A., and B. Magnusson Staaf. 2001. Rapport om rapporter—en diskussion kring kvalitetsbedömningar av arkeologiska rapporter. (Report 2001:3). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Heritage Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, W. F. 1996. Language & communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. M., and E. S. Chilton. 2015. Digging and destruction: Artifact collecting as meaningful social practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (4):318–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., and N. Chrisman. 1998. Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A 30:1683–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., and P. Luff. 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegardt, J., and A. Källén. 2011. Being through the past: Reflections on Swedish archaeology and heritage management. In Comparative archaeologies, ed. L. R. Lozny, 109–35. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hekman, S. 2010. The material of knowledge: Feminist disclosures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsjärvi, S., and H. Hurme. 1995. Teemahaastattelu. Helsinki, Finland: Yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Huvila, I. 2011. The politics of boundary objects: Hegemonic interventions and the making of a document. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 62 (12):2528–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huvila, I. 2012. Authorship and documentary boundary objects. Proceedings of 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), 1636–645. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Huvila, I. 2013. How a museum knows? Structures, work roles, and infrastructures of information work. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 64, 7:(2013) 1375–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennbert, K. 2008. “Nä, nu skall jag läsa arkeologi” Arkeologiutbildning i blickfånget. In Arkeologi och samhälle, ed. B. Petersson, K. Jennbert, and C. Holtorf, 13–27. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. W., ed. 2012. Histories of archaeological practices: Reflections on methods, strategies and social organisation in past fieldwork. Stockholm, Sweden: National Historical Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. 2007. Knowledge sharing across borders: A study in the IKEA world. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Juven, P.-A. 2013. Produire l'information hospitalière du codage des dossiers au gouvernement de l'activité. Revue d´anthropologie des connaissances 7 (4):815–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kansa, E. C., S. W. Kansa, and E. Watrall, Eds. 2011. Archaeology 2.0: New approaches to communication and collaboration. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Kansa, E. C., S. W. Kansa, M. M. Burton, and C. Stankowski. 2010. Googling the grey: Open data, web services, and semantics. Archaeologies 6 (2):301–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, R. 1994. Reading ¨all about¨ computerization: How genre conventions shape non-fiction social analysis. The Information Society 10 (3):147–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesberg, A., R. D. Frank, I. M. Faniel, and E. Yakel. 2013. The role of data reuse in the apprenticeship process. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50 (1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, K. 2009. Contract archaeology in Europe: An experiment in diversity. World Archaeology 41 (4):641–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 2002. Negotiating boundaries between scholars and practitioners: Knowledge, networks, and communities of practice. Management Communication Quarterly 16 (1):106.
   Google Scholar
• Kulturminneslagen [Swedish Cultural Heritage Act]. 1988. 1988:950.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. P. 2007. Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16 (3):307–39.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. M. 2001. Scrolling forward: Making sense of documents in the digital age. New York, NY: Arcade Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, C. 2006a. Learning from the Mars Rover Mission: Scientific discovery, learning and memory. Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (2):90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, C. 2006b. Remembering the moon: Memory issues in NASA´s lunar return. Presentation at the 2006 Annual Meeting, Society for Social Studies of Science, November 1–5, Vancouver, BC, Canada. http://www.cbprojs.com/published/?dl_id=11 (accessed March 23, 2016)
   Google Scholar
• Löwenborg, D. 2014. Recuperating gis data from excavations: On the use, or lack of use, of digital archaeological information. In Perspectives to archaeological information in the digital society, ed. I. Huvila, 11–23. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Archives, Library & Information, and Museum & Cultural Heritage Studies, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, N. W. 2009. Document theory. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 43 (1):1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N., and P. Wall. 2011. Behind the scenes: The business side of medical records. In Making work visible: Ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice, ed. M. H. Szymanski and J. Whalen, 147–59. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, E. C. 2012. Unearthing archives: An examination of documents generated in the course of archaeological fieldwork in Canada. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. 2011. On the record: The philosophy of recording. Internet Archaeology 29. http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue29/tag_index.html (accessed March 23, 2016)).
   Google Scholar
• Niccolucci, F., A. Felicetti, S. Hermon, and K. Nys. 2009. Managing full-text excavation data with semantic tools. In 10th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST (2009), ed. K. Debattista, C. Perlingieri, D. Pitzalis, and S. Spina, 2009. Geneve, Switzerland: Eurographics.
   Google Scholar
• Nunberg, G. 1996. Farewell to the information age. In The future of the book, ed. G. Nunberg, 103–38. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Østerlund, C. 2008a. Documents in place: Demarcating places for collaboration in healthcare settings. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 17 (2–3):195–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østerlund, C. 2008b. The materiality of communicative practices: The boundaries and objects of an emergency room genre. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 20:7–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østerlund, C., N. P. Dosa, and C. A. Smith. 2010. Mother, my medical record: What role do patients with chronic conditions and parents play in the management of their medical information? In Health informatics: A patient-centered approach to diabetes, ed. B. M. Hayes and W. Aspray, 271–91. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, C. 2010. Describing and interpreting the past: European and American approaches to the written record of the excavation. Bucharest, Romania: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 1995. The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. 2008. New ontologies. In The mangle in practice: Science, society, and becoming, ed. A. Pickering and K. Guzik, 1–14. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, A. M., and J. D. Hollan. 2009. Tabletop displays for small group study: Affordances of paper and digital materials. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’09, 1227–36. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvarieämbetet. 2007. Handbok för uppdragsarkeologi. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Heritage Board.
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvarieämbetet. 2012. Arkivering av arkeologisk dokumentation. Report 2012-03-22, Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Heritage Board.
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvarieämbetet. 2012b. Vägledning för tillämpning av Kulturminneslagen Uppdragsarkeologi (2 kap, 10–13) Tillämpning av Riksantikvarieämbetets föreskrifter och allmänna råd avseende verkställigheten av 2 kap. 10–13 lagen (1988:950) om kulturminnen m.m., Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Heritage Board.
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvarieämbetet. 2015. Lagar och stöd. http://www.raa.se/lagar-och-stod/.
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvarieämbetet. 2015b. Uppdragsarkeologi: Rapportering, förmedling och arkeologiskt dokumentationsmaterial [Contract archaeology: Reporting, mediation and archaeological documentation material]. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Heritage Board. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Riles, A. 2011. Collateral knowledge: Legal reasoning in the global financial markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 2002. How scientific practices matter: Reclaiming philosophical naturalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I., and H. J. Rubin. 2005. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sage, D. J., A. R. J. Dainty, and N. J. Brookes. 2010. Who reads the project file? Exploring the power effects of knowledge tools in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics 28 (6):629–39.
   Google Scholar
• Schibbye, K., M. Frisk, B. Sander, and A. Westerlind. 2007. Kulturmiljön som resurs: Hur kulturmiljöaspekterna på ett ändamålsenligt sätt kan behandlas i miljöbedömningar och miljökonsekvensbeskrivningar. Stockholm, Sweden: RAÄ.
   Google Scholar
• Sellen, A. J., and R. H. Harper. 2002. The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, D. J. 2009. Special ethical and scholarship considerations for the archaeological grey literature. The Grey Journal 5 (2):89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, M. 2007. Digital media, agile design, and the politics of archaeological authorship. In Archaeology and the media, ed. T. Clack and M. Brittain, 273–89. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M., and T. Sampalli. 2012. Ontology as boundary object. In Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference, 6–9 August 2012 Mysore, India, ed. A. Neelameghan and K. Raghavan, 131–37. Würzburg, Germany: Ergon Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Signore, O. 2009. Representing knowledge in archaeology: From cataloguing cards to Semantic Web. Archeologia e Calcolatori 20:111–28.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. Ceci n´est pas un objet-frontiére! Réflexions sur l´origine d´un concept. Revue d´anthropologie des connaissances 4 (1):18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3):387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1996. Supporting articulation work. In Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices, ed. R. Kling, 2nd ed., 407–23. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L., R. Trigg, and J. Blomberg. 2002. Working artefacts: Ethnomethods of the prototype. British Journal of Sociology 53 (2):163–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundin, O. 2011. Janitors of knowledge: Constructing knowledge in the everyday life of Wikipedia editors. Journal of Documentation 67 (5):840–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trompette, P., and D. Vinck. 2009. Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue d´anthropologie des connaissances 3 (1):a–v.
   Google Scholar
• Tudhope, D., C. Binding, S. Jeffrey, K. May, and A. Vlachidis. 2011. A STELLAR role for knowledge organization systems in digital archaeology. Bulletin of ASIS&T 37 (4):15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109 (1):121–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar