From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users

References

• Ansari, A., and E. Klinenberg. 2015. Modern romance. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Barraket, J., and M. S. Henry-Waring. 2008. Getting it on (line): Sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology 44(2):149–165. doi:10.1177/1440783308089167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berscheid, E., K. Dion, E. Hatfield, and G. W. Walster. 1971. Physical attractiveness and dating choice, a test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7(2):173–189. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(71)90065-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S. 2015. Swipe and burn. New Scientist 225(3002):30–33. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(15)60032-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhutta, C. B. 2012. Not by the book: Facebook as a sampling frame. Sociological Methods & Research 41(1):57–88. doi:10.1177/0049124112440795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson, M. A., and T. R. Levine. 2009. Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior 38(1):66–73. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9211-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, C., J. Birnholtz, and C. Abbott. 2015. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society 17(7), 1117–1136. doi:10.1177/1461444814521595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, K. A. 2008. Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, G., M. d. C. Gomes, R. Espanha, and V. Araújo. 2007. Mobile. Lisbon. Portugal: Obercom.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L. S. 2017. Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-seeking, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the Integrative Model. Computers in Human Behavior 72:246–258. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, E. P., J. H. Wong, H. H. Lo, W. Wong, J. H. Chio, and D. Y. Fong. 2016. The association between smartphone dating applications and college students' casual sex encounters and condom use. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 9:38–41. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2016.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. S. 1998. Dating on the net: Teens and the rise of “pure” relationships. In Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer Mediated Communication and Community, ed. S. Jones, 159–183. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, S. E., and M. H. M. van Dulmen. 2013. Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood 1(2):138–150. doi:10.1177/2167696813487181.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. R., and A. P. Barbee. 2008. Prelude to a kiss: Nonverbal flirting, opening gambits, and other communication dynamics in the initiation of romantic relationships. In Handbook of relationship initiation, ed. S. Sprecher, 97–120. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, G., and C. Cambre. 2016. Screened intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic. Social Media + Society 2(2):1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305116641976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguay, S. 2017. Dressing up Tinderella: Interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder. Information, Communication & Society 20(3):351–367. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1168471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, M., J. P. Calzo, A. P. Smiler, and L. M. Ward. 2009. “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men's negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research 46(5):414–424. doi:10.1080/00224490902775801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., P. W. Eastwick, B. R. Karney, H. T. Reis, and S. Sprecher. 2012. Online dating a critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13(1):3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganito, C. 2010. Women on the move: the mobile phone as a gender technology. Comunicação & Cultura 9:77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., C. Reiber, S. G. Massey, and A. M. Merriwether. 2012. Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology 16(2):161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W., E. P. Mulvey, and E. C. Shaw. 1995. Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin 118(3):392–404. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1992. The transformation of intimacy: Love, sexuality and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., D. P. Welsh, and M. S. Harper. 2006. No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research 43(3):255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, N., and S. Simmons. 2002. Intimacy as a double-edged phenomenon? An empirical test of Giddens. Social Forces 81(2):531–555. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern-Meekin, S., W. D. Manning, P. C. Giordano, and M. A. Longmore. 2012. Relationship churning in emerging adulthood: On/off relationships and sex with an ex. Journal of Adolescent Research 28(2):166–188. doi:10.1177/0743558412464524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardey, M. 2004. Mediated relationships. Information, Communication & Society 7(2):207–222. doi:10.1080/1369118042000232657.
   Google Scholar
• Hekma, G., and A. Giami. 2014. Sexual revolutions: An introduction. In Sexual Revolutions, eds. G. Hekma, and A. Giami, 1–24. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S. 2013. The mediatization of culture and society. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L. 2013. The place of the emplaced mobile: A case study into gendered locative media practices. Mobile Media & Communication 1(1):110–115. doi:10.1177/2050157912459738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, M., S. Owen, and L. Gerber. 2017. Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology 53(2):1–14. doi:10.1177/1440783316662718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illouz, E. 1997. Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalish, R., and M. Kimmel. 2011. Hooking up. Australian Feminist Studies 26.(67):137–151. doi:10.1080/08164649.2011.546333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaspar, K., L. V. Buß, J. Rogner, and T. Gnambs. 2016. Engagement in one-night stands in Germany and Spain: Does personality matter?. Personality and Individual Differences 92:74–79. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosinski, M., S. C. Matz, and S. D. Gosling. 2015. Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences. American Psychologist 70(6):543–556. doi:10.1037/a0039210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landovitz, R. J., C. H. Tseng, M. Weissman, M. Haymer, B. Mendenhall, K. Rogers, … and S. Shoptaw. 2013. Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California. Journal of Urban Health 90(4):729–739. doi:10.1007/s11524-012-9766-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeFebvre, L. E. 2017. Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 00:1–17 (accessed June 13, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C., C. A. Rivière, and J. Morel. 2016. Grindr casual hook-ups as interactional achievements. New Media & Society 18(11):2540–2558. doi:10.1177/1461444815589702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, H. A., W. D. Manning, M. A. Longmore, and P. C. Giordano. 2015. Gender and casual sexual activity from adolescence to emerging adulthood: Social and life course correlates. The Journal of Sex Research 52(5):543–557. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.906032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKee, F. 2016. Social media in gay London: Tinder as an alternative to hook-up apps. Social Media+ Society 2(3):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C. L. 2016. Tinder and humanitarian hook-ups: The erotics of social media racism. Feminist Media Studies 16(5):822–837 doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1137339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., K. Knight, J. Williams, J. Eden, and C. Shaw. 2013. Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research 50(1):37–47. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.623797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monto, M. A., and A. G. Carey. 2014. A new standard of sexual behavior? Are claims associated with the “hookup culture” supported by general social survey data? The Journal of Sex Research 51(6):605–615. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.906031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L., and B. Muthén. 1998–2015. Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., and F. Fincham. 2011. Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on ‘‘friends with benefits’’ relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior 40 (2):311–320. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9611-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. J., G. K. Rhoades, S. M. Stanley, and F. D. Fincham. 2010. “Hooking up” among college students: demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior 39(3):653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J., K. Quirk, and F. Fincham. 2014. Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 40(5):396–409. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., and K. A. Hayes. 2002. The casualties of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 19(5):639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillsworth, E. G., and M. G. Haselton. 2005. The Evolution of Coupling. Psychological Inquiry 16(2/3):98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race, K. 2015. Speculative pragmatism and intimate arrangements: Online hook-up devices in gay life. Culture, Health & Sexuality 17(4):496–511. doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.930181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranzini, G., and C. Lutz. 2017. Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media & Communication 5(1):80–101. doi:10.1177/2050157916664559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, B. 2014. Promiscuous intimacies: Rethinking the history of American casual sex. Journal of Historical Sociology 27(1):1–24. doi:10.1111/johs.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. A., S. Elliott, and G. R. Webber. 2011. Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender & Society 25(5):545–568. doi:10.1177/0891243211418642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., and I. H. Frieze. 1989. Young singles’ scripts for a first date. Gender & Society 3(2):258–268. doi:10.1177/089124389003002006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudder, C. 2014. Dataclysm: Who we are (when we think no one's looking). New York: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T. E. 2000. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society 3(1):3–37. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02.
   Google Scholar
• Sales, N. J. 2015. Tinder and the dawn of the “Dating Appocalypse”. Vanity Fair, 2015. http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating (accessed September 27, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Shade, L. R. 2007. Feminizing the mobile: Gender scripting of mobiles in North America. Continuum 21(2):179–189. doi:10.1080/10304310701269032.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2016. 15% of American Adults have used online dating sites or mobile dating apps, February 11. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/02/11/15-percent-of-american-adults-have-used-online-dating-sites-or-mobile-dating-apps/ (accessed July 24, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 2017. 45 impressive Tinder statistics, March 7. http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/tinder-statistics/ (accessed May 12, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Stempfhuber, M., and M. Liegl. 2016. Intimacy mobilized: Hook-up practices in the location-based social network Grindr. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41(1):51–70. doi:10.1007/s11614-016-0189-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, E., and E. De Caluwé. 2017a. Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior 70:341–350. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, E., and E. De Caluwé. 2017b. To Tinder or not to Tinder, that's the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences 110:74–79. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J., and T. Wasserman. 2011. Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior 40(6):1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Wiele, C., and S. T. Tong. 2014. Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of Grindr. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 619–630. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Vrangalova, Z. 2015. Does casual sex harm college students’ well-being? A longitudinal investigation of the role of motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior 44(4):945–959. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrangalova, Z., and A. D. Ong. 2014. Who benefits from casual sex? The moderating role of sociosexuality. Social Psychological and Personality Science 5(8):883–891. doi:10.1177/1948550614537308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, L. 2017. Amercian hookup: the new culture of sex on campus. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. 2016. What are you doing on Tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication & Society 20:1644–1659. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, M. K. 1990. Dating, Mating, and Marriage. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, T. E. D., and T. H. Fung. 2016. Relationships form so quickly that you won't cherish them: Mobile dating apps and the culture of instantaneous relationships. Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society: 1–6. ACM. doi:10.1145/2930971.2930973.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. 2016. Building Tinder, October 13. http://tech.gotinder.com/building-tinder/ (accessed July 24, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Zytko, D., S. A. Grandhi, and Q. Jones. 2014. Impression management struggles in online dating. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on supporting group work: 53–62. ACM. doi:10.1145/2660398.2660410.
   Google Scholar