Publication Cover
The Information Society
An International Journal
Volume 35, 2019 - Issue 4
600
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Patterns of polarization: Transnational dynamics in climate change online networks in the US and Switzerland

ORCID Icon
Pages 184-197 | Received 08 Sep 2017, Accepted 04 Apr 2019, Published online: 04 Jun 2019

References

  • Adamic, L. 2008. The social hyperlink. In The hyperlinked society. eds. J. Turow and L. Tsui, 227–249. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Adamic, L., and N. Glance. 2005. The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: Divided they blog. In LinkKDD’05: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, 36–43. New York: ACM.
  • Bakshy, E., S. Messing, and L. A. Adamic. 2015. Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science (New York, N.Y.) 348 (6239):1130–2. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160.
  • Beam, M. A., M. J. Hutchens, and J. D. Hmielowski. 2018. Facebook news and (de) polarization: reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information, Communication & Society 21 (7):940–58. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783.
  • Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Bennett, W. L., and A. Segerberg. 2013. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Blumler, J. G., and M. Gurevitch. 1995. The crisis of public communication. London: Routledge.
  • Bonfadelli, H. 2016. Climate change communication in Switzerland. In Oxford research encyclopedias: Climate change. ed. H. Von Storch. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.450.
  • Boykoff, M. T. 2007. From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (4):477–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.
  • Brass, D. J., and G. Labianca. 1999. Social capital, social liabilities, and social resources management. In Corporate social capital and liability. eds. R. Th. A. J. Leenders and S. M. Gabbay, 323–338. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Brönnimann, S., C. Appenzeller, M. C. Maspoli, J. Fuhrer, M. Grosjean, R. Hohmann, K. Ingold, R. Knutti, M. A. Liniger, and C. C. Raible. 2014. Climate change in Switzerland: A review of physical, institutional, and political aspects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 5 (4):461–81. doi: 10.1002/wcc.280.
  • Centola, D. M. 2013. Homophily, networks, and critical mass: Solving the start-up problem in large group collective action. Rationality and Society 25 (1):3–40. doi: 10.1177/1043463112473734.
  • Chang, W.-Y., and H. W. Park. 2012. The network structure of the Korean blogosphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (2):216–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01567.x.
  • Conover, M., J. Ratkiewicz, M. R. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. 2011. Political polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 89–96. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
  • De Maeyer, J. 2012. Towards a hyperlinked society: A critical review of link studies. New Media & Society 15 (5):737–51. doi: 10.1177/1461444812462851.
  • Dubois, E., and G. Blank. 2018. The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society 21 (5):729–45. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
  • Elgesem, D., L. Steskal, and N. Diakopoulos. 2015. Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication 9 (2):169–88. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.983536.
  • Feldman, L. 2016. The effects of network and cable TV news viewing on climate change opinion, knowledge, and behavior. In Oxford research encyclopedias: Climate science. ed. H. von Storch, 1–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Franzen, A., and D. Vogl. 2013. Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change 23 (5):1001–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009.
  • Fraser, N. 1990. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26:56–80. doi: 10.2307/466240.
  • Fu, J. S., and M. Shumate. 2017. News media, social media, and hyperlink networks: An examination of integrated media effects. The Information Society 33 (2):53–63. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2016.1271379.
  • Garrett, R. K. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2):265–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.
  • Gaskins, B., and J. Jerit. 2012. Internet news: Is it a replacement for traditional media outlets? The International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (2):190–213. doi: 10.1177/1940161211434640.
  • gfs.bern. 2012. Abstrakte Wirtschaftssorgen konkretisieren sich im EU-Raum (Survey conducted on behalf of Credit Suisse). Accessed February 7, 2014. http://www.gfsbern.ch/de-ch/Detail/credit-suisse-sorgenbarometer-2012.
  • Gonzalez-Bailon, S. 2009. Opening the black box of link formation: Social factors underlying the structure of the web. Social Networks 31 (4):271–80. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.07.003.
  • Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hargittai, E., J. Gallo, and M. Kane. 2008. Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice 134 (1–2):67–86. doi: 10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x.
  • Himelboim, I., S. McCreery, and M. Smith. 2013. Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (2):40–60. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12001.
  • Holland, P. W., and Leinhardt, S. 1976. Local structure in social networks. Sociological Methodology 7(1): 1–45.
  • Honneth, A. 1996. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Hunter, D. R., S. M. Goodreau, and M. S. Handcock. 2008. Goodness of fit of social network models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (481):248–58. doi: 10.1198/016214507000000446.
  • Hunter, D. R., M. S. Handcock, C. T. Butts, S. M. Goodreau, and M. Morris. 2008. ERGM: A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks. Journal of Statistical Software 24 (3):1–29.
  • Keck, M. E., and K. Sikkink. 1999. Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal 51 (159):89–101. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00179.
  • Krippendorff, K. 2012. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage Publications.
  • Lawrence, E., J. Sides, and H. Farrell. 2010. Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1):141–57. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709992714.
  • Lusher, D., and R. Ackland. 2011. A relational hyperlink analysis of an online social movement. Journal of Social Structure 12 (5):1–35.
  • Lusher, D., J. Koskinen, and G. Robins. 2012. Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2):155–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
  • McPherson, M.,. L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1):415–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
  • Messing, S., and S. J. Westwood. 2014. Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research 41 (8):1042–63. doi: 10.1177/0093650212466406.
  • Meyer, D. S., and S. Staggenborg. 1996. Movements, counter movements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 101 (6):1628–60. doi: 10.1086/230869.
  • Monge, P. R., and N. S. Contractor. 2003. Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nie, N. H., D. W. Miller III, S. Golde, D. M. Butler, and K. Winneg. 2010. The World Wide Web and the US political news market. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):428–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00439.x.
  • Page, B. I., and R. Y. Shapiro. 1983. Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review 77 (01):175–90. doi: 10.2307/1956018.
  • Painter, J., and T. Ashe. 2012. Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10. Environmental Research Letters 7 (4):1–8.
  • Park, H. W., and M. Thelwall. 2008. Developing network indicators for ideological landscapes from the political blogosphere in South Korea. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (4):856–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00422.x.
  • Pilny, A., and M. Shumate. 2012. Hyperlinks as extensions of offline instrumental collective action. Information, Communication & Society 15 (2):260–86. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.606328.
  • Rogers, R. 2013. Mapping public web space with the Issuecrawler. In Digital cognitive technologies: Epistemology and the knowledge economy. ed. B. Reber and C. Brossaud, 89–99. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Saad, L. 2013. Americans’ concerns about global warming on the rise. Accessed October 15, 2015. http://www.gallup.com/poll/161645/americans-concerns-global-warming-rise.aspx.
  • Schmid-Petri, H. 2017. Do conservative media provide a forum for skeptical voices? The link between ideology and the coverage of climate change in British, German, and Swiss newspapers. Environmental Communication 11 (4):1–14.
  • Shumate, M., and J. Lipp. 2008. Connective collective action online: An examination of the hyperlink network structure of an NGO issue network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (1):178–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01436.x.
  • Studer, F. 2010. Die sachstandsberichte des IPCC in der schweizer presse (1990–2007): eine analyse der berichterstattung in ausgewählten deutsch- und französischsprachigen schweizer tageszeitungen. Saarbrücken: VDM Publishing.
  • Sunstein, C. R. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Taneja, H. 2017. Mapping an audience-centric World Wide Web: A departure from hyperlink analysis. New Media & Society 19 (9):1331–48. doi: 10.1177/1461444816642172.
  • Thompson, S. K. 2002. Sampling. (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Tremayne, M. 2005. News websites as gated cybercommunities. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 11 (3):28–39. doi: 10.1177/135485650501100303.
  • Williams, H. T. P., J. R. McMurray, T. Kurz, and F. H. Lambert. 2015. Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change 32:126–38. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006.
  • Wu, L., and R. Ackland. 2014. How Web 1.0 fails: The mismatch between hyperlinks and clickstreams. Social Network Analysis and Mining 4 (202):1–7.
  • Zald, M. N., and B. Useem. 1987. Movement and countermovement interaction: Mobilization, tactics, and state involvement. In Social movements in an organizational society. eds. M. N Zald and J. D. McCarthy, 247–271. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.