Collaboration without consensus: Building resilience in sustainable agriculture through ICTs

References

• Aker, J. C., and M. Fafchamps. 2010. How does mobile phone coverage affect farm-gate prices? Evidence from West Africa. Accessed September 27, 2020. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.364.3363&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aker, J. C. 2011. Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agricultural Economics 42 (6):631–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aker, J. C., and C. Ksoll. 2016. Can mobile phones improve agricultural outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Niger. Food Policy 60:44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. A. 2002. Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 93 (1–3):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. A., and C. I. Nicholls. 2005. Agroecology and the search for a truly sustainable agriculture. Mexico City, Mexico: United Nations Environmental Programme, Environmental Training Network for Latin America and the Caribbean. Accessed September 27, 2020. http://www.agroeco.org/doc/agroecology-engl-PNUMA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., and G. Feder. 2004. Agricultural extension: Good intentions and hard realities. The World Bank Research Observer 19 (1):41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2017. Environmental governance for the anthropocene? Social-ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning. Sustainability 9 (7):1232–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, J., and E. Oreglia. 2015. The myth of market price information: Mobile phones and the application of economic knowledge in ICTD. Economy and Society 44 (2):271–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge?, ed. J. Law, 196–223. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchini, S., and M. Raina. 2002. Warana: The case of an Indian rural community adopting ICT. Accessed September 27, 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228233804_Warana_The_Case_of_an_Indian_Rural_Community_Adopting_ICT
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., and G. R. Conway. 1991. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper 296). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. Accessed September 27, 2020. https://www.ids.ac.uk/download.php?file=files/Dp296.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, B., and L. Kendall. 2019. The ins and outs of participation in a weather information system. In ICT4D: International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, eds. P. Nielsen and H. C. Kimaro, 3–14. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, B., L. Kendall, J. Srinivasan, O. Hoysala, and P. Dasgupta. 2017. Understanding capabilities through everyday practice: The case of a weather information system for farmers in West Bengal. In ICTD ‘17: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Technologies and Development, Article No. 18, 1–10. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. R., H. Ahsan, and E. Akand. 2018. Krishi Kontho: An agricultural information service in Bangladesh. In NordiCHI ‘18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 203–214. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. R., H. Ahsan, M. Rashid, and B. K. Das. 2019. Are you magicians? The collaborative work of an agricultural information service. In ICTD ‘19: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Article No. 19, 1–10. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. H. 2015. Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change 5 (2):114–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, S. A., and A. N. Fernando. 2012. The value of advice: Evidence from mobile phone-based agricultural extension (Finance Working Paper No. 13-047). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B. and U. Kothari, eds. 2001. Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. 2003. Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Development 31 (8):1325–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, S. 2002. Information technology: The global key to precision agriculture and sustainability. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 36 (2–3):93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A., D. Basu, and R. Goswami. 2012. Accessing Agricultural information through mobile phone: Lessons of IKSL services in West Bengal. Indian Research Journal of External Education 12 (3):102–7.
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., P. Matthews, and H. Rizvi. 2011. Kheti: Mobile multimedia in an agricultural co-operative. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 15 (6):597–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DRCSC. 2013. Enhancing adaptive capacity and increasing resilience of small and marginal farmers in Purulia and Bankura districts of West Bengal (proposal submitted to The Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat, Washington, DC via National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai). Accessed October 27, 2020. http://www.drcsc.org/CCA/3/Docs/Project_Proposal_NABARD_AFB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2011. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evenson, R. E., and D. Gollin. 2003. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science (New York, N.Y.) 300 (5620):758–62. doi: 10.1126/science.1078710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fafchamps, M., and B. Minten. 2012. Impact of SMS-based agricultural information on Indian farmers. The World Bank Economic Review 26 (3):383–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder, G., A. Willett, and W. Zijp. 1999. Agricultural extension: Generic challenges and some ingredients for solutions extension. Accessed October 4, 2020. file:///Users/harmeetsawhney/Downloads/SSRN-id620481.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 1990. The anti-politics machine. In The anthropology of the state: A reader, eds. A. Sharma and A. Gupta, 270–86. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C. 2016. Resilience (republished). Ecology and Society 21 (4):2020. https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss4/art44/. [Mismatch. ] doi: 10.5751/ES-09088-210444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, C., G. Lieblein, S. Gliessman, T. A. Breland, N. Creamer, R. Harwood, L. Salomonsson, J. Helenius, D. Rickerl, R. Salvador, et al. 2003. Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22 (3):99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gakuru, M., K. Winters, and F. Stepman. 2009. Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ICTs. Accra, Ghana: Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, R., R. Veeraraghavan, K. Toyama, and V. Ramprasad. 2007. Digital green: Participatory video for agricultural extension. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. Bangalore, India: IEEE. Accessed October 18, 2020. https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/abstract/document/4937388.
   Google Scholar
• Glendenning, C. J., S. Babu, and K. Asenso-Okyere. 2010. Review of agricultural extension in India: Are farmers information needs being met (IFPRI Discussion Paper). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, C. P. 2009. Computational sustainability: Computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society. The Bridge 39 (4):5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., and A. V. Ospina. 2019. Conceptualising the link between information systems and resilience: A developing country field study. Information Systems Journal 29 (1):70–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanasios, S., and M. Slavova. 2019. How do development actors do “ICT for development”? A strategy‐as‐practice perspective on emerging practices in Ghanaian agriculture. Information Systems Journal 29 (4):888–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark, S., A. Tulloch, A. Gordon, T. Mazor, N. Bunnefeld, and N. Levin. 2015. Cross-boundary collaboration: Key to the conservation puzzle. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12:12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, L., and A. Dearden. 2018. a. Disentangling participatory ICT design in socioeconomic development. In PDC’18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference, Vol. 1, 1–12. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/3210586.3210596.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L., and A. Dearden. 2018b. Towards alternate theories of change for M4ARD. In Digital technologies for agricultural and rural development in the Global South, ed. R. Duncombe, 92–103. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L., and A. Dearden. 2018c. ICTs for agroecology: Shifting agricultural ICT4D from “I” to “C. In Information and communication technologies for development, ed. J. Choudrie, M. S. Islam, F. Wahid, J. M. Bass, and J. E. Priyatma, 451–62. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 1991. Situating learning in communities of practice. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, eds. L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, 63–82. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Medhi-Thies, I., P. Ferreira, N. Gupta, J. O’Neill, and E. Cutrell. 2015. KrishiPustak: A social networking system for low-literate farmers. In CSCW ’15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1670–81. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, A., and S. Howard. 1998. The rich picture: A tool for reasoning about work context. Interactions 5 (2):21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. 2004. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change 35 (4):639–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyella, E. E., and K. Honest. 2015. HIS standardization in developing countries: Use of boundary objects to enable multiple translations. The African Journal of Information Systems 8 (1):64–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreglia, E. 2013. When technology doesn’t fit: Information sharing practices among farmers in rural China. In ICTD. 13: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 165–76. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13 (3):249–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, A. V., and R. Heeks. 2010. Linking ICTs and climate change adaptation: A conceptual framework for e-resilience and e-adaptation (report to IDRC). Manchester, UK: Centre for Developmental Informatics, University of Manchester. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/44416
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2009. A polycentric approach for coping with climate change (Policy Research Working Paper 5095). Washington, DC: Development Economics, World Bank. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/9034/WPS5095_WDR2010_0021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oswick, C. 2005. Boundary objects and organizational knowledge: A discursive perspective. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/conf/olkc/archive/oklc6/papers/oswick.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., M. Craps, A. Dewulf, E. Mostert, D. Tabara, and T. Taillieu. 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12 (2):5–16. Accessed October, 2020. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/main.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parayil, G. 1992. The green revolution in India: A case study of technological change. Technology and Culture 33 (4):737–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, N., D. Chittamuru, A. Jain, P. Dave, and T. S. Parikh. 2010. Avaaj Otalo: A field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural India. In CHI ’10: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 733–42. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pingali, P. L. 2012. Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (31):12302–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912953109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. N. 1995. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23 (8):1247–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PTI New Delhi. 2019. IMD to issue block-level weather forecast from next year. The Hindu BusinessLine, April 23. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/imd-to-issue-block-level-weather-forecast-from-next-year/article26919180.ece.
   Google Scholar
• Puri, S. K. 2007. Integrating scientific with indigenous knowledge: Constructing knowledge alliances for land management in India. MIS Quarterly 31 (2):355–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan, B., B. Nardi, S. T. Lovell, J. Norton, B. Tomlinson, and D. J. Patterson. 2016. Computational agroecology: Sustainable food ecosystem design. In Chi EA ’16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 423–35. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sala, S. 2009. Information and communication technologies for climate change adaptation, with a focus on the agricultural sector. Accessed October 16, 2020. http://www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload/295345/Sala%20ICT-climate%20change%20Agriculture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saravanan, R., and S. Bhattacharjee. 2014. Mobile phone applications for agricultural extension in India. In Mobile phone for agricultural extension: Worldwide m-agri innovations and promise for future, ed. S. Raj, 1–75. New Delhi, India: New India Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. J., and A. Gurumurthy. 2005. Political economy of the information society: A southern view (Briefing paper prepared for WSIS Paper Series of Instituto Del Tercer Mundo). Bangalore, India: IT for Change. Accessed October 5, 2020. https://itforchange.net/sites/default/files/ITfC/Full%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. 2013. New media, development & globalization. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. 2014. Being Open in ICT4D. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2526515
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, J., and J. Burrell. 2015. On the importance of price information to fishers and to economists: Revisiting mobile phone use among fishers in Kerala. Information Technologies & International Development 11 (1):57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science Technology and Human Values 35 (5):601–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science 19 (3):387–420. 1907–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J. A. M., and A. Bruinsma. 2016. ICT enabled boundary spanning arrangements in collaborative sustainability governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 18:91–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2004. Evaluating participatory development: Tyranny, power and (re)politicisation. Third World Quarterly 25 (3):557–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. ICT in agriculture: Connecting smallholders to knowledge, networks, and institutions (Report No. 64605). Washington, DC: World Bank. Accessed October 16, 2020. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/455701468340165132/pdf/646050ESW0P1180lture0e0Sourcebook12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wyche, S., and C. Steinfield. 2016. Why don’t farmers use cell phones to access market prices? Technology affordances and barriers to market information services adoption in rural Kenya. Information Technology for Development 22 (2):320–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar