Social network dynamics, bots, and community-based online misinformation spread: Lessons from anti-refugee and COVID-19 misinformation cases

References

• Bennett, W. L., and S. Livingston. 2018. The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication 33 (2):122–39. doi: 10.1177/0267323118760317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, D. M., and K. M. Carley. 2018. Bot-hunter: A tiered approach to detecting & characterizing automated activity on Twitter. Accessed October 16, 2022. http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/LB_5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., and E. Ferrara. 2016. Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21 (11). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7090.
   Google Scholar
• Block, P. 2015. Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks 40:163–73. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, L. A. 2009. Cyber-communities. In International encyclopedia of civil society, ed. H.K. Anheier and S. Toepler, 587–600. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Reducing stigma. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/reducing-stigma.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. W., and P. A. Shotton. 2016. Changing the face of advocacy? Explaining interest organizations’ use of social media strategies. Political Communication 33 (3):374–91. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1043477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C., and K. Fu. 2017. The relationship between cyberbalkanization and opinion polarization: Time-series analysis on Facebook pages and opinion polls during the Hong Kong Occupy Movement and the associated debate on political reform. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (5):266–83. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., K. Lerman, and E. Ferrara. 2020. Tracking social media discourse about the COVID-19 pandemic: Development of a public coronavirus Twitter data set. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6 (2):e19273. doi: 10.2196/19273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cinelli, M., W. Quattrociocchi, A. Galeazzi, C. M. Valensise, E. Brugnoli, A. L. Schmidt, P. Zola, F. Zollo, and A. Scala. 2020. The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports 10 (1):16598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., A. Rozza, and A. Arvidsson. 2014. Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication 64 (2):317–32. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechêne, A., C. Stahl, J. Hansen, and M. Wänke. 2010. The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14 (2):238–57. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Vicario, M., A. Bessi, F. Zollo, F. Petroni, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, H. E. Stanley, and W. Quattrociocchi. 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (3):554–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarzo, P. M., D. Vayanos, and J. Zwiebel. 2003. Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (3):909–68. doi: 10.1162/00335530360698469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. N., B. W. McKeever, A. E. Holton, C. Clarke, and G. Eosco. 2015. The power of a picture: Overcoming scientific misinformation by communicating weight-of-evidence information with visual exemplars. Journal of Communication 65 (4):639–59. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, D., H. Alhazmi, and S. S. Gokhale. 2013. Triads, transitivity, and social effects in user interactions on Facebook. In 2013 Fifth International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks, 68–73. New York: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir-Gvirsman, S. 2017. Media audience homophily: Partisan websites, audience identity and polarization processes. New Media & Society 19 (7):1072–91. doi: 10.1177/1461444815625945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, E. 2017. Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday 22 (8). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/8005.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., and C. Wells. 2020. Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication 37 (2):145–56. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., J. A. Rohde, and H. D. Wu. 2020. Who is responsible for Twitter’s echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 U.S. election networks. Information, Communication & Society 23 (2):234–51. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1499793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., and C. Vargo. 2020. “Fake news” and emerging online media ecosystem: An integrated intermedia agenda-setting analysis of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Communication Research 47 (2):178–200. doi: 10.1177/0093650218777177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., and T. G. L. A. van der Meer. 2020. Misinformation and polarization in a high-choice media environment: How effective are political fact-checkers? Communication Research 47 (2):227–50. doi: 10.1177/0093650218819671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haustein, S., T. D. Bowman, K. Holmberg, A. Tsou, C. R. Sugimoto, and V. Larivière. 2016. Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (1):232–8. doi: 10.1002/asi.23456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, F., and R. Adler-Nissen. 2019. Ideological asymmetry in the reach of pro-Russian digital disinformation to United States audiences. Journal of Communication 69 (2):168–92. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqz006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, J. L, and K. L. Einstein. 2015. Do facts matter? Information and misinformation in American politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., R. K. Garrett, and L. S. Gleason. 2010. A new era of minimal effects? A response to Bennett and Iyengar. Journal of Communication 60 (1):15–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01470.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., and S. Leinhardt. 1971. Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies 2 (2):107–24. doi: 10.1177/104649647100200201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal 36 (3):471–501. doi: 10.2307/256589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarren, J. L., and E. Moro. 2011. Affinity Paths and information diffusion in social networks. Social Networks 33 (2):134–42. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M., T. Geng, J.-Y Q. Li, R. Xia, C.-T. Huang, H. Kim, and J. Tang. 2018. A computational approach for examining the roots and spreading patterns of fake news: Evolution tree analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 84:103–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerit, J., and Y. Zhao. 2020. Political misinformation. Annual Review of Political Science 23 (1):77–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., S. van der Linden, C. Panagopoulos, and C. D. Hardin. 2018. Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology 23:77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasprak, A. 2020. The origins and scientific failings of the COVID-19 “bioweapon” conspiracy theory. Accessed October 16, 2022. https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/04/01/covid-19-bioweapon.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T., and T. Zerback. 2013. Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication 63 (6):993–1010. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, A. 2017. Motivation with misinformation: Conceptualizing lacuna individuals and publics as knowledge-deficient, issue-negative activists. Journal of Public Relations Research 29 (4):176–93. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2017.1363047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, G., and O. Wong. 2002. The tie effect on information dissemination: The spread of a commercial rumor in Hong Kong. Social Networks 24 (1):49–75. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00050-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. M. J., M. A. Baum, Y. Benkler, A. J. Berinsky, K. M. Greenhill, F. Menczer, M. J. Metzger, B. Nyhan, G. Pennycook, D. Rothschild, M. Schudson, S. A. Sloman, C. R. Sunstein, E. A. Thorson, D. J. Watts, and J. L. Zittrain. 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359 (6380):1094–6. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. K., Y. Kim, and K. Coe. 2018. When social media become hostile media: An experimental examination of news sharing, partisanship, and follower count. Mass Communication and Society 21 (4):450–72. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2018.1429635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C. C. Bracken. 2002. Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28 (4):587–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magelinski, T., D. Beskow, and K. M. Carley. 2019. Graph-Hist: Graph classification from latent feature histograms with application to bot detection. Accessed October 16, 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.01180
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, C., D. Felmlee, and D. W. Osgood. 2018. Peer influence, friend selection, and gender: How network processes shape adolescent smoking, drinking, and delinquency. Social Networks 55:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1):415–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejias, U. A., and N. E. Vokuev. 2017. Disinformation and the media: The case of Russia and Ukraine. Media, Culture & Society 39 (7):1027–42. doi: 10.1177/0163443716686672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman, O. 2020. A quarter of all tweets about climate change are produced by bots. Accessed October 16, 2022. https://grist.org/climate/a-quarter-of-all-tweets-about-climate-change-are-produced-by-bots/.
   Google Scholar
• Mocanu, D., L. Rossi, Q. Zhang, M. Karsai, and W. Quattrociocchi. 2015. Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Computers in Human Behavior 51:1198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., and N. S. Contractor. 2003. Theories of communication networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasek, J., G. Sood, and J. A. Krosnick. 2015. Misinformed about the Affordable Care Act? Leveraging certainty to assess the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Communication 65 (4):660–73. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, G., P. Pattison, Y. Kalish, and D. Lusher. 2007. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29 (2):173–91. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, Y., and N. Pickles. 2020. Bot or not? The facts about platform manipulation on Twitter. Accessed August 22, 2021. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/bot-or-not.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., and K. Thorson. 2017. Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication 67 (2):233–55. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J., L. Jian, K. Driscoll, and F. Bar. 2017. Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society 19 (8):1214–35. doi: 10.1177/1461444816634054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J., L. Jian, K. Driscoll, and F. Bar. 2018. The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior 83:278–87. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, S. 2011. DiscoverText: Software training to unlock the power of text. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 373. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., and H. G. Boomgaarden. 2017. Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-based model of reinforcing spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks, and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication 67 (2):256–81. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., and E. A. Thorson. 2015. The prevalence, consequence, and remedy of misinformation in mass media systems. Journal of Communication 65 (4):589–95. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2007. Neither Hayek nor Habermas. Public Choice 134 (1-2):87–95. doi: 10.1007/s11127-007-9202-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, E. 2016. Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication 33 (3):460–80. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., L. Guo, and M. A. Amazeen. 2018. The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society 20 (5):2028–49. doi: 10.1177/1461444817712086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., D. Roy, and S. Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359 (6380):1146–51. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., and L. Bode. 2017. Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication 39 (5):621–45. doi: 10.1177/1075547017731776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2018. Why populism is troubling for democratic communication. Communication, Culture and Critique 11 (1):21–34. doi: 10.1093/ccc/tcx005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., A. Yang, and K. Thorson. 2021. Serial participants of social media climate discussion as a community of practice: A longitudinal network analysis. Information, Communication & Society 24 (7):941–59. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., G. Robins, P. Pattison, and E. Lazega. 2013. Exponential random graph models for multilevel ­networks. Social Networks 35 (1):96–115. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., and Y. Song. 2020. Viral misinformation and echo chambers: The diffusion of rumors about genetically modified organisms on social media. Internet Research 30 (5):1547–64. doi: 10.1108/INTR-11-2019-0491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, C. 2017. Fake news. It’s complicated. Accessed October 16, 2022. https://firstdraftnews.org:443/latest/fake-news-complicated/.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. 2002. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 (9):5766–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082090499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. 2015. Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxietymoderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication 65 (4):699–719. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., and H. Gil de Zúñiga. 2021. What’s next? Six observations for the future of political misinformation research. American Behavioral Scientist 65 (2):277–89. doi: 10.1177/0002764219878236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, M. 2010. Technology, networks and communities: An exploration of network and community theory and technosocial forms. Information, Communication & Society 13 (5):747–64. doi: 10.1080/13691180903271572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik, S., S. Messing, A. Smith, L. Rainie, and P. Hitlin. 2018. Bots in the Twittersphere. Accessed October 16, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/04/09/bots-in-the-twittersphere/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020. How to report misinformation online. Accessed December 27, 2020. https://www.who.int/campaigns/connecting-the-world-to-combat-coronavirus/how-to-report-misinformation-online.
   Google Scholar