Appeals to the people: A content analysis of references to the people in traditional media, social media, and parliamentary materials

References

• Abts, K., and S. Rummens. 2007. Populism versus democracy. Political Studies 55 (2):405–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L. 2004. Media logic and political communication. Political Communication 21 (3):293–6. doi: 10.1080/10584600490481307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., and M. Gurevitch. 2001. The new media and our political communication discontents: Democratizing cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society 4 (1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/713768514.
   Google Scholar
• Boomgaarden, H. G., and R. Vliegenthart. 2007. Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: The role of news media content. Electoral Studies 26 (2):404–17. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., and K. Brants. 2014. Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication 29 (6):703–19. doi: 10.1177/0267323114545709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., W. van Der Brug, and C. H. de Vreese. 2013. An experimental test of the impact of style and rhetoric on the perception of right-wing populist and mainstream party leaders. Acta Politica 48 (2):192–208. doi: 10.1057/ap.2012.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brants, K., and P. Van Praag. 2006. Signs of media logic half a century of political communication in the Netherlands. Javnost – The Public 13 (1):25–40. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2006.11008905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47 (1):2–16. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. 2005. The lonely citizen: Indirect representation in an age of networks. Political Communication 22 (2):197–214. doi: 10.1080/10584600590933197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer, M. 2011. Populist communication and publicity: An empirical study of contextual differences in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review 17 (3):286–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H., F. Esser, T. Aalberg, C. Reinemann, and J. Stanyer. 2018. Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (4):423–38. doi: 10.1177/1940161218790035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2013. Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., N. Fawzi, and A. O. Larsson. 2017. Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society 20 (9):1279–92. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., N. Ernst, F. Esser, and F. Büchel. 2017. Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society 20 (8):1109–26. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., A. Stępińska, and D. N. Hopmann. 2016. Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In Populist political communication in Europe, eds. T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, and C. H. de Vreese, 365–80. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., S. Engesser, and F. Esser. 2017. Bipolar populism? The use of anti-elitism and people-centrism by Swiss parties on social media. Swiss Political Science Review 23 (3):253–61. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbeck, J., J. M. Grimes, and A. Rogers. 2010. Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (8):1612–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. 2018. A typology of populism: Toward a revised theoretical framework on the sender side and receiver side of communication. International Journal of Communication 12:2171–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., L. Bos, N. Fawzi, C. Reinemann, I. Andreadis, N. Corbu, C. Schemer, A. Schulz, T. Shaefer, T. Aalberg, et al. 2018. Start spreading the news: A comparative experiment on the effects of populist communication on political engagement in sixteen European countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (4):517–38. doi: 10.1177/1940161218786786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., and R. Vliegenthart. 2020. The rise of a populist zeitgeist? A content analysis of populist media coverage in newspapers published between 1990 and 2017. Journalism Studies 21 (1):19–36. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2019.1620114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3):319–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, T., E. F. Fowler, M. M. Franz, and T. N. Ridout. 2018. Issue consistency? Comparing television advertising, tweets, and e-mail in the 2014 senate campaigns. Political Communication 35 (1):32–49. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. 2014. Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory 24 (1):42–60. doi: 10.1111/comt.12029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S. 2014. How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior 34:131–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., K. Gattermann, and R. Vliegenthart. 2018. Understanding the dynamics of politicians’ visibility in traditional and social media. The Information Society 34 (4):215–28. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2018.1463334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., G. Van Noort, R. Vliegenthart, and C. H. De Vreese. 2013. Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication 28 (1):53–66. doi: 10.1177/0267323112464837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., S. Inthorn, and K. Wahl-Jorgensen. 2005. Citizens or consumers? What the media tell us about political participation. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G. 2014. Mediatization and political populism. In Mediatization of politics: Understandinig the transformation oof western democracries, 42–56. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., and Y. Surel. 2002. The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Democracies and the populist challenge, eds. F. Esser and J. Strömbäck, 1–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B., and S. Tormey. 2014. Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies 62 (2):381–97. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4):541–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48 (2):147–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J. E., and C. Nass. 1989. Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly 66 (2):277–84. doi: 10.1177/107769908906600202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, J., J. Rovny, R. Bakker, E. Edwards, L. Hooghe, S. Jolly, J. Koedam, F. Kostelka, G. Marks, G. Schumacher, et al. 2017. Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics 4 (1):205316801668691. doi: 10.1177/2053168016686915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. 2014. The nucleus of populism: In search of the lowest common denominator. Government and Opposition 49 (4):573–99. doi: 10.1017/gov.2013.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., S. L. De Lange, and W. Van der Brug. 2014. A populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics 20 (4):563–75. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., W. Van der Brug, S. L. De Lange, and J. Parlevliet. 2017. Persuasive populism? Estimating the effect of populist messages on political cynicism. Politics and Governance 5 (4):136–45. doi: 10.17645/pag.v5i4.1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., J. Matthes, and H. Boomgaarden. 2016. Candidate-Centered and Anti-Immigrant Right-Wing Populism. Aalberg, T., Esser, F. Reinemann, C., Stromback, & J. De Vreese, C. (Hrsg.) Populist political communication in Europe, 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., M. Eichholz, E. Kim, and B. Wrigley. 2001. Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78 (2):233–46. doi: 10.1177/107769900107800202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. 2012. The gatekeeping function: Distributions of information in media and the real world. The Journal of Politics 74 (2):514–28. doi: 10.1017/S002238161100171X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., and S. McAdams. 2015. News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication 32 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2014.881942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., and L. Dang-Xuan. 2013. Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining 3 (4):1277–91. doi: 10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3.
   Google Scholar
• Strikovic, E., T. G. L. A. van der Meer, E. van der Goot, L. Bos, and R. Vliegenthart. 2020. On behalf of the people: The use of public opinion and the perception of “the people” in political communication strategies of Dutch MPs. The International Journal of Press/Politics 25 (1):135–57. doi: 10.1177/1940161219864297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. A. 2000. Populism. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. 2004. Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3):269–88. doi: 10.1080/1356931042000263528.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., and R. Vliegenthart. 2014. Studying the tango: An analysis of parliamentary questions and press coverage in the Netherlands. Journalism Studies 15 (4):392–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., S. Soroka, and M. Nuytemans. 2007. The mass media’s political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies 41 (6):814–836.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S. 2013. Women on the battleground: Does gender condition the use of negative campaigning? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 23 (2):154–176.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., and R. Vliegenthart. 2010. Negative campaigning across different communication channels: Different ball games? The International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (4):441–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaria, G. 2018. The People and Populism. Ratio Juris 31 (1):33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zulianello, M., A. Albertini, and D. Ceccobelli. 2018. A populist zeitgeist? The communication strategies of Western and Latin American political leaders on Facebook. The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (4):439–57. doi: 10.1177/1940161218783836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar