“There are only a few things that you cannot manage without internet”: Realization of capabilities through internet (non)use by ultra-Orthodox Jewish women

References

• Barzilai-Nahon, K., and G. Barzilai. 2005. Cultured technology: The internet and religious fundamentalism. The Information Society 21 (1):25–40. doi: 10.1080/01972240590895892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. 2000. Sect, subsidy and sacrifice: An economist’s view of ultra-Orthodox Jews. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3):905–53. doi: 10.1162/003355300554944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of religion, ed. J. E. Richardson, 241–58. New York: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Büchi, M., N. Just, and M. Latzer. 2016. Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in internet use. New Media & Society 18 (11):2703–22. doi: 10.1177/1461444815604154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahaner, L. 2020. The ultra-Orthodox community on the conservatism-modernism spectrum. Accessed June 13, 2023. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/26911
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. A. 2010. When religion meets new media. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. A., ed. 2013. Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. A., ed. 2015. Digital Judaism: Jewish negotiations with digital media and culture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics. 2021. Israeli CBS Social Survey (in Hebrew). Accessed June 13, 2023. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/subjects/Pages/%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%93%D7%9F-%D7%94%D7%93%D7%99%D7%92%D7%99%D7%98%D7%9C%D7%99-2020.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cornes, R., and T. Sandler. 1999. The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidman, L. 1991. Tradition in a rootless world: Women turn to Orthodox Judaism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. 1983. The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (1):1–15. doi: 10.1086/268763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Or, T. 1994. Educated and ignorant: Ultraorthodox Jewish women and their world. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Fader, A. 2013. Nonliberal Jewish women’s audiocassette lectures in Brooklyn: A crisis of faith and the morality of media. American Anthropologist 115 (1):72–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01536.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1991. Haredi society: Sources, trends and processes (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1993. The market model and religious radicalism. In Jewish fundamentalism in comparative perspective: Religion, ideology, and the crisis of modernity, ed. L. J. Silberstein, 192–215. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6):1360–80. doi: 10.1086/225469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. 2004. Internet access and use in context. New Media & Society 6 (1):137–43. doi: 10.1177/1461444804042310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., and G. Walejko. 2008. The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society 11 (2):239–56. doi: 10.1080/13691180801946150.
   Google Scholar
• Iannaccone, L. R. 1992. Sacrifice and stigma: Reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectives. Journal of Political Economy 100 (2):271–91. doi: 10.1086/261818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E. 1957. The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on a hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly 21 (1):61–78. doi: 10.1086/266687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E. 1961. The social itinerary of technical change: Two studies on the diffusion of innovation. Human Organization 20 (2):70–82. doi: 10.17730/humo.20.2.322v6303331k1x37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., and P. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal influence. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. 1972. Why conservative churches are growing? New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. 1978. Why conservative churches are still growing. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 17 (2):165–72. doi: 10.2307/1386160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. T., and R. W. Duff. 1972. The strength of weak ties. Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (3):361–6. doi: 10.1086/268018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livio, O., and K. Tenenboim-Weinblatt. 2007. Discursive legitimation of a controversial technology: Ultra-Orthodox Jewish women in Israel and the internet. The Communication Review 10 (1):29–56. doi: 10.1080/10714420601168467.
   Google Scholar
• Malach, G., and L. Cahaner. 2020. The yearbook of ultra-Orthodox society in Israel. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Malach, G., and L. Cahaner. 2022. The yearbook of ultra-Orthodox society in Israel. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Neriya-Ben Shahar, R. 2017. Negotiating agency: Amish and ultra-Orthodox women’s responses to new media. New Media & Society 19 (1):81–95. doi: 10.1177/1461444816649920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6 (1):65–78. doi: 10.1353/jod.1995.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Rashi, T. 2013. The kosher cell phone in ultra-Orthodox society: A technological ghetto within the global village? In Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media Worlds, ed. H. Campbell, 173–81. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, H., M. Blondheim, and E. Katz. 2019. It’s the text, stupid! Mobile phones, religious communities, and the silent threat of text messages. New Media & Society 21 (11–12):2325–46. doi: 10.1177/1461444819846054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, H., and T. Rashi. 2015. Pashkevillim in campaigns against new media: What can pashkevillim accomplish that newspapers cannot? In Digital Judaism: Jewish negotiations with digital media and culture, ed. H. Campbell, 161–82. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Samet, M. 2005. New if forbidden from the Torah: Chapters in the history of Orthodoxy (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: Carmel Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schejter, A., and N. Tirosh. 2016. A justice-based approach for new media policy: In the paths of righteousness. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1979. Equality of what? In Tanner lectures on human values, Vol. I, ed. S. M. McMurring, 195–220. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1993. Markets and freedoms: Achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms. Oxford Economic Papers 45 (4):519–41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2004. Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics 10 (3):77–80. doi: 10.1080/1354570042000315163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2005. Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development 6 (2):151–66. doi: 10.1080/14649880500120491.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., and J. A. G. M. van Dijk. 2014. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society 16 (3):507–26. doi: 10.1177/1461444813487959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., and J. A. G. M. van Dijk. 2015. Toward a multifaceted model of internet access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The Information Society 31 (5):379–91. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S., F. Henwood, A. Hart, and J. Smith. 2005. Digital divide, health information and everyday life. New Media & Society 7 (2):199–218. doi: 10.1177/1461444805050747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar