Interdisciplinarity and communication across research employing different methods under the loupe: A bibliometric examination of the literature on boundary-crossing ICT use

References

• Adisa, T. A., G. Gbadamosi, and E. L. Osabutey. 2017. What happened to the border? The role of mobile information technology devices on employees’ work-life balance. Personnel Review 46 (8):1651–71. doi:10.1108/PR-08-2016-0222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alise, M. A., and C. Teddlie. 2010. A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4 (2):103–26. doi:10.1177/1558689809360805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andel, S. A., S. R. Kessler, S. Pindek, G. Kleinman, and P. E. Spector. 2019. Is cyberloafing more complex than we originally thought? Cyberloafing as a coping response to workplace aggression exposure. Computers in Human Behavior 101:124–30. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. 2016. Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria, M., and C. Cuccurullo. 2017. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11 (4):959–75. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., G. E. Kreiner, and M. Fugate. 2000. All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review 25 (3):472–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., and E. Demerouti. 2007. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology 22 (3):309–28. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., J. J. Hakanen, E. Demerouti, and D. Xanthopoulou. 2007. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2):274–84. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, W. R., and J. B. Olson-Buchanan. 2007. The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management 33 (4):592–610. doi:10.1177/0149206307302552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braukmann, J., A. Schmitt, L. Ďuranová, and S. Ohly. 2018. Identifying ICT-related affective events across life domains and examining their unique relationships with employee recovery. Journal of Business and Psychology 33 (4):529–44. doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9508-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesley, N. 2005. Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family 67 (5):1237–48. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. C. 2000. Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations 53 (6):747–70. doi:10.1177/0018726700536001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., D. Derks, L. L. ten Brummelhuis, and A. B. Bakker. 2014. New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work-family balance, and well-being. In The impact of ICT on quality of working life, edited by C. Korunka and P. Hoonakker, 123–41. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Derks, D., A. B. Bakker, and M. Gorgievski. 2021. Private smartphone use during worktime: A diary study on the unexplored costs of integrating the work and family domains. Computers in Human Behavior 114:106530. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., A. B. Bakker, P. Peters, and P. van Wingerden. 2016. Work-related smartphone use, work-family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations 69 (5):1045–68. doi:10.1177/0018726715601890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., and A. B. Bakker. 2014. Smartphone use, work-home interference, and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied Psychology 63 (3):411–40. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00530.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., D. van Duin, M. Tims, and A. B. Bakker. 2015. Smartphone use and work-home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 88 (1):155–77. doi:10.1111/joop.12083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., H. Van Mierlo, and E. B. Schmitz. 2014. A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: Examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 19 (1):74–84. doi:10.1037/a0035076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, D., L. L. ten Brummelhuis, D. Zecic, and A. B. Bakker. 2014. Switching on and off … : Does smartphone use obstruct the possibility to engage in recovery activities? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23 (1):80–90. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.711013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim. 2021. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 133:285–96. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drange, I., V. H. Bernstrøm, W. Nilsen, K. N. Kiranmai, N. Junker, and J. Olson-Buchanan. 2020. Health, familial and organizational consequences of cross-domain IT use in everyday life. Accessed May 18, 2024. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020168144.
   Google Scholar
• Duxbury, L. E., C. A. Higgins, and S. Mills. 1992. After-hours telecommuting and work-family conflict: A comparative analysis. Information Systems Research 3 (2):173–90. doi:10.1287/isre.3.2.173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxbury, L., C. A. Higgins, and D. R. Thomas. 1996. Work and family environments and the adoption of computer-supported supplemental work-at-home. Journal of Vocational Behavior 49 (1):1–23. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxbury, L., C. Higgins, R. Smart, and M. Stevenson. 2014. Mobile technology and boundary permeability. British Journal of Management 25 (3):570–88. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichberger, C., D. Derks, and H. Zacher. 2022. A daily diary study on technology-assisted supplemental work, unfinished tasks, and sleep: The role of problem-solving pondering. International Journal of Stress Management 29 (1):61–74. doi:10.1037/str0000237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegaard, O., and J. A. Wallin. 2015. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 105 (3):1809–31. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farivar, F., and J. Richardson. 2021. Workplace digitalisation and work-nonwork satisfaction: The role of spillover social media. Behaviour & Information Technology 40 (8):747–58. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1723702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner, G. H., and R. W. Renn. 2004. Technology-assisted supplemental work: Construct definition and a research framework. Human Resource Management 43 (2-3):179–200. doi:10.1002/hrm.20014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner, G. H., and R. W. Renn. 2010. Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Human Relations 63 (1):63–82. doi:10.1177/0018726709351064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Lillo, F., M. Úbeda-García, and B. Marco-Lajara. 2016. The intellectual structure of research in hospitality management: A literature review using bibliometric methods of the journal International Journal of Hospitality Management. International Journal of Hospitality Management 52:121–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghislieri, C., F. Emanuel, M. Molino, C. G. Cortese, and L. Colombo. 2017. New technologies smart, or harm work-family boundaries management? Gender differences in conflict and enrichment using the JD-R theory. Frontiers in Psychology 8:1070. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghislieri, C., V. Dolce, D. Sanseverino, S. Wodociag, A.-M. Vonthron, É. Vayre, M. Giunchi, and M. Molino. 2022. Might insecurity and use of ICT enhance internet addiction and exhaust people? A study in two European countries during emergency remote working. Computers in Human Behavior 126:107010. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, A. G., and C. Geisler. 2007. Work-life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations 60 (3):519–51. doi:10.1177/0018726707076698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, K., and S. Kumar. 2021. Financial literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies 45 (1):80–105. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., and N. J. Beutell. 1985. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review 10 (1):76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., A. J. Onwuegbuzie, and L. A. Turner. 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (2):112–33. doi:10.1177/1558689806298224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., B. A. Lautsch, and S. C. Eaton. 2006. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior 68 (2):347–67. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., M. N. Ruderman, P. W. Braddy, and K. M. Hannum. 2012. Work–nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior 81 (1):112–28. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, G. E. 2006. Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27 (4):485–507. doi:10.1002/job.386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, G. E., E. C. Hollensbe, and M. L. Sheep. 2006. On the edge of identity: Boundary dynamics at the interface of individual and organizational identities. Human Relations 59 (10):1315–41. doi:10.1177/0018726706071525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, G. E., E. C. Hollensbe, and M. L. Sheep. 2009. Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal 52 (4):704–30. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43669916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and G. Goertz. 2006. A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis 14 (3):227–49. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, M., W. J. Orlikowski, and J. Yates. 2013. The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science 24 (5):1337–57. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R., T. D. Baird, C. M. Littlefield, G. Kofinas, F. S. Chapin, III, and C. L. Redman. 2008. Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society 13 (2):46. doi:10.5751/ES-02671-130246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, W., T. Nordberg, I. Drange, N. M. Junker, S. Y. Aksnes, A. Cooklin, E. Cho, L. Habib, S. Hokke, J. Olson-Buchanan, and V. Bernstrøm. 2024. Boundary-crossing ICT use: A scoping review of the current literature and a road map for future research. [In progress]
   Google Scholar
• Nippert-Eng, C. E. 1996. Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Cathain, A., E. Murphy, and J. Nicholl. 2007. Integration and publications as indicators of “yield” from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (2):147–63. doi:10.1177/1558689806299094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson-Buchanan, J. B., W. R. Boswell, and T. J. Morgan. 2016. The role of technology in managing the work and nonwork interface. In The Oxford handbook of work and family, edited by T. D. Allen and L. T. Eby, 333–48. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., R. M. Bustamante, and J. A. Nelson. 2010. Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4 (1):56–78. doi:10.1177/1558689809355805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. 2011. A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 12 (2):78–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie, H. G. 1976. Do you see what I see? The epistemology of interdisciplinary inquiry. Educational Researcher 5 (2):9–15. doi:10.2307/1174278.
   Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V. L., and J. W. Creswell, P. 2008. The evolution of mixed methods research. In The mixed methods reader, edited by V. L Clark and J. W. Creswell, 5–27. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. 2003. Epistemology: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saltkjel, T., T. A. Andreassen, S. Helseth, and R. Minas. 2023. A scoping review of research on coordinated pathways towards employment for youth in vulnerable life situations. European Journal of Social Work 26 (1):66–78. doi:10.1080/13691457.2021.1977249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schardt, C., M. B. Adams, T. Owens, S. Keitz, and P. Fontelo. 2007. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 7 (1):1–6. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, H. 1973. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (4):265–9. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., and C. Fritz. 2007. The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 12 (3):204–21. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., and C. Fritz. 2015. Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior 36 (S1):S72–S103. doi:10.1002/job.1924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., and U.-V. Bayer. 2005. Switching off mentally: Predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 10 (4):393–414. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and J. W. Creswell. 2007. The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1):3–7. doi:10.1177/2345678906293042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedone, A. M. 2022. Keeping up with work email after hours and employee wellbeing: Examining relationships during and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Occupational Health Science 6 (1):51–72. doi:10.1007/s41542-021-00107-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennakoon, U. S. 2018. Crossing the work/life boundary with ICT: Moderating effect of ICT perception on the relationship between cross-domain ICT use and work/life conflict. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management 5 (2):194–215. doi:10.1177/2322093718788712.
   Google Scholar
• Tsay, M.-Y. 2009. Citation analysis of Ted Nelson’s works and his influence on hypertext concept. Scientometrics 79 (3):451–72. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-1641-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakalopoulos, K. 2023. Shedding some (more) light in Bourdieu’s habitus and doxa: A socio-phenomenological approach. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 53 (2):255–70. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcour, P. M., and L. W. Hunter. 2005. Technology, organizations, and work-life integration. In Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives, edited by E. E. Kossek and S. J. Lambert, 61–84. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 2008. Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. The British Journal of Sociology 59 (1):59–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00182.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J., and E. Rose. 2011. Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies 32 (7):941–61. doi:10.1177/0170840611410829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J., M. Bittman, and J. E. Brown. 2008. Families without borders: Mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions. Sociology 42 (4):635–52. doi:10.1177/0038038508091620.
   Google Scholar
• Wushe, T., and J. Shenje. 2019. The relationship between social media usage in the workplace and employee productivity in the public sector: Case study of government departments in Harare. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 17 (1):1–10. doi:10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1116.
   Google Scholar
• www.covidence.org. Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Q. Yu, F. Zheng, C. Long, Z. Lu, and Z. Duan. 2016. Comparing KeyWords Plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (4):967–72. doi:10.1002/asi.23437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar