775
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Whose Side Are You On? Exploring the Role of Perspective Taking on Third-Party’s Reactions to Workplace Deviance

, , &

References

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086–1120. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
  • Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703
  • Barling, J., Dupré, K. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2009). Predicting workplace aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 671–692. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163629
  • Batson, C. D. (1994). Prosocial motivation: Why do we help others? In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 333–381). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., … Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
  • Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S. (2007). Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/generalized method of moments estimation and testing. The Stata Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 7(4), 465–506.
  • Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1983). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to dispute resolution effectiveness. In M. H. Bazerman, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.349
  • Bowes-Sperry, L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30, 288–306. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.16387886
  • Campbell, K. W., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23–43. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23
  • Catellani, P., & Milesi, P. (2001). Counterfactuals and roles: Mock victims’ and perpetrators’ accounts of judicial cases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 247–264. doi:10.1002/ejsp.39
  • Chui, C. W. S., & Dietz, J. (2014). Observing workplace incivility towards women: The roles of target reactions, actor motives, and actor-target relationships. Sex Roles, 71(1–2), 95–108. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0367-7
  • Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 247–265. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.247
  • Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79–98. doi:10.1023/A:1022091609047
  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 13–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  • Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2009). Perspective taking. In H. T. Reis and S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (Vol. 1, pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Information Age.
  • Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg, & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Foster, E. M., & McLanahan, S. (1996). An illustration of the use of instrumental variables: Do neighborhood conditions affect a young person’s chance of finishing high school? Psychological Methods, 1, 249–260. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.3.249
  • Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19, 4, 378–384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02096.x
  • Glomb, T. M. (2002). Workplace anger and aggression: Informing conceptual models with data from specific encounters. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 20–36. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.7.1.20
  • Goldberg, C., Clark, M., & Henley, A. (2011). Speaking up: A conceptual model of voice responses following the unfair treatment of others in non-union settings. Human Resource Management, 50, 75–94. doi:10.1002/hrm.20402
  • Grice, J., Cohn, A., Ramsey, R., & Chaney, J. (2015). On muddled reasoning and mediation modeling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 214–225. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1049350
  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303–314. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(84)90069-2
  • Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029–1054. doi:10.2307/1912775
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). Incivility, social undermining, bullying … Oh My! A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 499–519. doi:10.1002/job.689
  • IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • Johnson, S. C., Baxter, L. C., Wilder, L. S., Pipe, J. G., Heiserman, J. E., & Prigatano, G. P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain, 125, 1808–1814.
  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
  • Kearns, J. N., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal transgressions: Self-serving or relationship-serving biases? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 321–333. doi:10.1177/0146167204271594
  • Kelley, H. H. (1960). The analysis of common sense. A review of “The psychology of interpersonal relations” by Fritz Heider. Contemporary Psychology, 5, 1–3.
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). The mediation myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 202–213. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1049349
  • Lotz, S., Okimoto, T. G., Schlösser, T., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2011). Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 477–480. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.004
  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., & Pirlott, A. G. (2015). Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 30–43. doi:10.1177/1088868314542878
  • Malle, B. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in causal attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 895–919. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895
  • Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2012). Moral, cognitive, and social: The nature of blame. In J. Forgas K. Fiedler and C. Sedikides (Eds.), Social thinking and interpersonal behaviour (14th sydney symposium of social psychology). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 147. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340
  • Malle, B. F., Knobe, J., & Nelson, S. (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in behavior explanations: New answers to an old question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 491–514. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.491
  • Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2013). Beyond the consequences to the individual victim: The impact of abusive supervision on third-party observers. In R. A. Giacalone, & M. D. Promislo (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: Implications for individual well-being (pp. 23–43). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties’ reactions to abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1040–1055. doi:10.1037/apl0000002
  • Myers, M. W., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). Empathy, perspective taking and prosocial behavior: Caring for others like we care for the self. In J. J. Froh, & A. C. Parks (Eds.), Activities for teaching positive psychology: A guide for instructors (pp. 77–83). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Norenzayan, A., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Telling what they want to know: Participants tailor causal attributions to researchers’ interests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1011–1020.
  • Okimoto, T. G., & Wenzel, M. (2011). The other side of perspective taking: Transgression ambiguity and victims’ revenge against their offender. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 373–378. doi:10.1177/1948550610393032
  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
  • O’Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011). A model of third parties’ morally-motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36, 526–543. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0311
  • Pirlott, A., & MacKinnon, D. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
  • Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2010). The cost of bad behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 39, 64–71. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.10.006
  • Reich, T. C., & Hershcovis, M. S. (2015). Observing workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 203–215. doi:10.1037/a0036464
  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572. doi:10.2307/256693
  • Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues, 69, 322–340. doi:10.1111/josi.12017
  • Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C. M. (2010). Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self-regulation in third-party responses to injustice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 89–106. doi:10.5840/beq20102017
  • Sargan, J. D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26, 393–415. doi:10.2307/1907619
  • Shaver, M. J. (2005). Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. Journal of Management, 31, 330–353. doi:10.1177/0149206304272149
  • Skarlicki, D., & Kulik, C. (2004) Third party reactions to employee mistreatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 183–229. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26005-1
  • Skorinko, J. L., Laurent, S., Bountress, K., Nyein, K. P., & Kuckuck, D. (2014). Effects of perspective taking on courtroom decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 303–318. doi:10.1111/jasp.12222
  • Smith, E. R. (2012). Attitudes and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1–3. doi:10.1037/a0026676
  • Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335–340. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00470.x
  • Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A. & Levine B. (2009). The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 62–71. doi:10.1080/00223890802484381
  • StataCorp. (2015). Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
  • Stillwell, A. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The construction of victim and perpetrator memories: Accuracy and distortion in role-based accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1157–1172. doi:10.1177/01461672972311004
  • Stock, J. H., Wright, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2002). A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 518–529. doi:10.1198/07350010228861865818.
  • Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4, 279–282. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
  • Tate, C. U. (2015). On the overuse and misuse of mediation analysis: It may be a matter of timing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 235–246. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1062380
  • Thoemmes, F. (2015). Reversing arrows in mediation models does not distinguish plausible models. Journal of Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 226–234. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1049351
  • Trafimow, D. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on mediation analyses: What if planetary scientists used mediation analysis to infer causation? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 197–201. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1064290
  • Trafimow, D. (2016). The probability of simple versus complex causal models in causal analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 1–8. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0731-3
  • Umphress, E. E., Simmons, A. L., Folger, R., Ren, R., & Bobocel, R. (2013). Observer reactions to interpersonal injustice: The roles of perpetrator intent and victim perception. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 327–349. doi:10.1002/job.1801
  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attribution theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–73. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
  • Yunus, O. M., Khalid, S., & Nordin, M. (2012). A personality trait and workplace deviant behaviors. Human Resource Management, 47, 8678–8683.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.