References
- Amrhein, V., & Greenland, A. (2018). Remove, rather than redefine, statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 4. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0224-0
- Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543–554. doi:10.1177/1745691612459060
- Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B., Wagenmakers, E. J., Berk, R., … Johnson, V. E., (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 6. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
- Bishop, D. V. M., & Thompson, P. A. (2016). Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value. PeerJ, 4, e1715.
- Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafó, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 451–412. doi:10.1038/nrn3502
- Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Forsell, E., Teck-Hua, H., Huber, M., Johannesson, M., … Hang, W. (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science 351, 1433–1436.
- Chambers, C. (2014). Registered Reports: A step change in scientific publishing. Accessed at https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing on March 22, 2018.
- Crane, H., & Martin, R. (2017). Is statistics meeting the needs of science? Accessed at https://psyarxiv.com/q2s5m/ on March 22, 2018.
- David, T., Valentin, A., C. N., Areshenkoff, Carlos, B.-C., Beh, E. J., Yusuf, B., … Fernando, M.-R. (2017). Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on” Redefine statistical significance”. PeerJ Preprints, 6, e3411v3.
- Fraser, H., Parker, T., Nakagawa, S., Barnett, A., & Fidler, F. (2018). Questionable Research Practices in Ecology and Evolution. Accessed at https://osf.io/ajyqg/ on March 21, 2018.
- Gigerenzer, G., Switjtink Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The Empire of Chance: How probability changed science and everyday life.
- Hamlin, K. (2017). Comment at http://philosophyofbrains.com/2017/10/02/should-we-redefine-statistical-significance-a-brains-blog-roundtable.aspx.
- Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2017). Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): Investigating the robustness of widespread p-hacking. PeerJ, 5, e3068.
- Hartgerink, C. H., van Aert, R. C., Nuijten, M. B., Wicherts, J. M., van Assen, M. A. (2016). Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: What is going on? PeerJ, 4, e1935.
- Head, M., Holman, L., Lanfear, L. R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of P-hacking in science. PLOS Biology, 13, e1002106.
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). The proposal to lower P Value thresholds to .005. Journal of the American Medical Association, 319, 1429–1430.
- John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953
- Johnson, V. E., Payne, R. D., Wang, T., Asher, A., & Mandal, S. (2017). On the reproducibility of psychological science. J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 112, 1–10. doi:10.1080/01621459.2016.1240079
- Lakens, D. Justify Your Alpha: A Response to “Redefine Statistical Significance”. PsyArXiv, 18 Sept. (2017). Web.
- Mackey, A. (2012). Why (or why not), when, and how to replicate research. In G. Porte (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp. 21–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Masicampo, E. J., & Lalande, D. R. (2012). A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)), 65, 2271–2279. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.711335
- Maxwell, S. E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147–163. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.147
- Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate really mean?” The American Psychologist, 70, 487–498. doi:10.1037/a0039400
- Mayo, D. (2017). Comment at http://philosophyofbrains.com/2017/10/02/should-we-redefine-statistical-significance-a-brains-blog-roundtable.aspx.
- McShane, B., Gal, B., Gelman, D., Robert, A. C., & Tackett, J. L. (2017). Abandon statistical significance. arXiv:1709.07588.
- Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 231, 289–337. doi:10.1098/rsta.1933.0009
- Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1205–1226. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
- Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
- Perezgonzalez, J. D., & Frias-Navarro, D. (2017). Retract 0.005 and propose using JASP, instead. psyarxiv.com/t2fn8.
- Porter, T. M. (1988). The Rise of Statistical Thinking: 1820–1900.
- Porter, T. M. (1996). Trust in Numbers.
- Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-Curve: A key to the file drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology.
- Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2017). Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. PLoS Biology, 15, e2000797. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797
- Tel Aviv University. (n.d.). Replicability vs reproducibility. Retrieved from http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html
- Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2015). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1–2. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1012991
- Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., van Aert, R. C., & van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-Hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832.