967
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Work-Related Impression Formation: Reviewing Parenthood Penalties and Investigating a “Fatherhood Penalty” for Single Fathers

References

  • Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the 'Big Two': Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028
  • Allen, T. D., & Russell, J. E. A. (1999). Parental leave of absence: Some not so family-friendly implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 166–191. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01380.x
  • Allen, T. D., Russell, J. E. A., & Rush, M. C. (1994). The effects of gender and leave of absence on attributions for high-performance, perceived organizational commitment, and allocation of organizational rewards. Sex Roles, 31, 443–464. doi:10.1007/Bf01544200
  • Aranda, B., & Glick, P. (2014). Signaling devotion to work over family undermines the motherhood penalty. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 91–99. doi:10.1177/1368430213485996
  • Baron, R. A., Markman, G. D., & Hirsa, A. (2001). Perceptions of women and men as entrepreneurs: Evidence for differential effects of attributional augmenting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 923–929. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.923
  • Bear, J. B., & Glick, P. (2017). Breadwinner bonus and caregiver penalty in workplace rewards for men and women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(7), 780–788. doi:10.1177/1948550616683016
  • Biblarz, T. J., & Stacey, J. (2010). How does the gender of parents matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 3–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x
  • Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 544–557. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544
  • Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2005). Attitudes toward traditional and nontraditional parents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 436–445. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00244.x
  • Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 477–487. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00477.x
  • Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00041-3
  • Butler, A. B., & Skattebo, A. (2004). What is acceptable for women may not be for men: The effect of family conflicts with work on job-performance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 553–564. doi:10.1348/0963179042596478
  • Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236
  • Coleman, J. M., & Franiuk, R. (2011). Perceptions of mothers and fathers who take temporary work leave. Sex Roles, 64(5–6), 311–323. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9918-8
  • Cooke, L. P. (2014). Gendered parenthood penalties and premiums across the earnings distribution in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 30(3), 360–372. doi:10.1093/esr/jcu044
  • Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338. doi:10.1086/511799
  • Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 343–370. doi:10.1177/1088868314564789
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn't cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701–718. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x
  • Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 225–248. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1711
  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001
  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2011). Social role theory. A biosocial analysis of sex differences and similarities. In P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 485–476). London, UK: Sage.
  • Ebert, I. D., Steffens, M. C., & Kroth, A. (2014). Warm, but maybe not so competent? – Contemporary implicit stereotypes of women and men in Germany. Sex Roles, 70(9–10), 359–375. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0369-5
  • Etaugh, C., & Moss, C. (2001). Attitudes of employed women toward parents who choose full-time or part-time employment following their child's birth. Sex Roles, 44, 611–619. doi:10.1023/A:1012247226549
  • Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215–223. doi:10.1023/A:1018850404838
  • Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1236. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4 ed., Vol. 1., pp. 357–411). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fleischmann, A., & Sieverding, M. (2015). Reactions toward men who have taken parental leave: Does the length of parental leave matter? Sex Roles, 72(9–10), 462–476. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0469-x
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 21–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21
  • Fuegen, K., Biernat, M., Haines, E., & Deaux, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 737–754. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00383.x
  • Fuegen, K., & Endicott, N. F. (2010). Evidence of shifting standards in judgments of male and female parents' job-related ability. Current Research in Social Psychology, 15, 53–61.
  • Goldberg, P. A. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28–30. doi:10.1007/BF03180445
  • Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.
  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 189–198. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189
  • King, E. B. (2008). The effect of bias on the advancement of working mothers: Disentangling legitimate concerns from inaccurate stereotypes as predictors of advancement in academe. Human Relations, 61(12), 1677–1711. doi:10.1177/0018726708098082
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). The mediation myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 202–213. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1049349
  • McPherson, E., Banchefsky, S., & Park, B. (2018). Psychological consequences of the Dad Bod: Using biological and physical changes to increase essentialist perceptions of fathers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 330–336. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.012
  • Miner, K. N., Pesonen, A. D., Smittick, A. L., Seigel, M. L., & Clark, E. K. (2014). Does being a mom help or hurt? Workplace incivility as a function of motherhood status. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(1), 60–73. doi:10.1037/a0034936
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science facult’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109
  • Okimoto, T. G., & Heilman, M. E. (2012). The “bad parent” assumption: How gender stereotypes affect reactions to working mothers. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 704–724. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01772.x
  • Park, B., & Banchefsky, S. (2018). Leveraging the social role of Dad to change gender stereotypes of men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(9), 1380–1394. doi:10.1177/0146167218768794
  • Park, B., Banchefsky, S., & Reynolds, E. B. (2015). Psychological essentialism, gender, and parenthood: Physical transformation leads to heightened essentialist conceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 949–967. doi:10.1037/pspa0000040
  • Park, B., Smith, J. A., & Correll, J. (2008). Having it all’’ or ‘‘doing it all’’? Perceived trait attributes and behavioral obligations as a function of workload, parenthood, and gender. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1156–1164. doi:10.1002/ejsp.535
  • Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. (2004). The paradox of the lesbian worker. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 719–735. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00382.x
  • Reese, G., Steffens, M. C., & Jonas, K. J. (2013). When black sheep make us think: Information processing and devaluation of in- and out-group norm deviants. Social Cognition, 31(4), 482–503. doi:10.1521/soco_2012_1005
  • Riggs, J. M. (1997). Mandates for mothers and fathers: Perceptions of breadwinners and care givers. Sex Roles, 37(7/8), 565–580. doi:10.1023/A:1025611119822
  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1004–1010. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004
  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239
  • Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 322–340. doi:10.1111/josi.12017
  • Rudolph, U., Böhm, R., & Lummer, M. (2007). Ein Vorname sagt mehr als 1000 Worte: Zur sozialen Wahrnehmung von Vornamen (A first name says more than 1000 words: On the social perception of first names). Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 17–31. doi:10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.17
  • Smith, F. L., Tabak, F., Showail, S., Parks, J. M., & Kleist, J. S. (2005). The name game: Employability evaluations of prototypical applicants with stereotypical feminine and masculine first names. Sex Roles, 52(1–2), 63–82. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1194-7
  • Steffens, M. C., Niedlich, C., Beschorner, R., & Köhler, M. (2019). Do positive and negative stereotypes of gay and heterosexual men affect job-related impressions? Sex Roles, 80(9–10), 548–564. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0963-z
  • Steffens, M. C., Schult, J. C., & Ebert, I. D. (2009). Feminization of management leads to backlash against agentic applicants: Lack of social skills, not gender, determines low hireability judgments in student samples. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51, 16–46.
  • Stroebe, W., Gadenne, V., & Nijstad, B. A. (2018). Do our psychological laws apply only to college students? External validity revisited. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 384–395. doi:10.1080/01973533.2018.1513362
  • Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 409–429. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409
  • Tate, C. U. (2015). On the overuse and misuse of mediation analysis: It may be a matter of timing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 235–246. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1062380
  • Trafimow, D. (2015). Introduction to the Special Issue on mediation analyses: What if planetary scientists used mediation analysis to infer causation? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 197–201. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1064290
  • Trafimow, D. (2018). An a priori solution to the replication crisis. Philosophical Psychology, 31(8), 1188–1214. doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1490707
  • Vandello, J. A., Hettinger, V. E., Bosson, J. K., & Siddiqi, J. (2013). When equal isn't really equal: The masculine dilemma of seeking work flexibility. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 303–321. doi:10.1111/josi.12016
  • Vinkenburg, C. J., van Engen, M. L., Coffeng, J., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2012). Bias in employment decisions about mothers and fathers: The (dis)advantages of sharing care responsibilities. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 725–741. doi:10.1111/J.1540-4560.2012.01773.X
  • Vogt, A.-C., & Pull, K. (2010). Warum Väter ihre Erwerbstätigkeit (nicht) unterbrechen: Mikroökonomische versus in der Persönlichkeit des Vaters begründete Determinanten der Inanspruchnahme von Elternzeit durch Väter. [Why fathers (don’t) take parental leave. Microeconomic vs. personality based determinants]. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 48–68. doi:10.1688/1862-0000_ZfP_2010_01_Vogt
  • Wayne, J. H., & Cordeiro, B. L. (2003). Who is a good organizational citizen? Social perception of male and female employees who use family leave. Sex Roles, 49(5/6), 233–246. doi:10.1023/A:1024600323316
  • Wilde, A., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in dynamic stereotypes: A comparison between Germany and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(2), 188–196. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00181.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.