Unpacking Backlash: Individual and Contextual Moderators of Bias against Female Professors

References

• Anderson, K. J., & Kanner, M. (2011). Inventing a gay agenda: Students’ perceptions of lesbian and gay professors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 1538–1564. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00757.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, R. J., Bryant, W. K., Mathios, A., Kang, H., & Bell, D. (2006). Electronic course evaluations: Does an online delivery system influence student evaluations? The Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 21–37. doi:10.3200/JECE.37.1.21-37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedggood, R. E., & Donovan, J. D. (2012). University performance evaluations: What are we really measuring? Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 825–842. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.549221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecham, R. (2009). Teaching quality and student satisfaction: Nexus or simulacrum? London Review of Education, 7(2), 135–146. doi:10.1080/14748460902990336
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 170–179. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohan, J. S. (1993). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17(1), 5–21. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldry, J., Wood, W., & Kashy, D. A. (2001). Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 689–705. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L., Uhlmann, E. L., & Newman, G. E. (2013). The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 891–908. doi:10.1037/a0034701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan-Bricker, N. (2013). New evidence: There is no science-education crisis. Retrieved from https://newrepublic.com/article/114608/stem-funding-dwarfs-humanities-only-one-crisis
   Google Scholar
• Catalyst. (2017). Women in academia: Quick take. Retrieved from https://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-academia
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A. (2003). Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work? Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 495–518. doi:10.1023/A:1025492407752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronicle of Higher Education. (2011). Average faculty salaries by field and rank at 4-year colleges and universities, 2010-11. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Average-Faculty-Salaries-by/126586
   Google Scholar
• Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Journal of Marketing Education, 31(1), 16–30. doi:10.1177/0273475308324086
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coladarci, T., & Kornfield, I. (2007). RateMyProfessors.com versus Formal in-Class Student Evaluations of Teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(6), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, P., Cooper, C., Gunnell, D., Haw, S., Lawson, K., Macintyre, S., … Thompson, S. (2012). Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: New MRC guidance. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(12), 1182–1186. doi:10.1136/jech-2011-200375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, D. (2014). Gender and perceptions of occupational prestige: Changes over 20 years. Sage Open, 1–11. doi:10.1177/2158244013518923
   Google Scholar
• Daprile, L. (2018). College students used to rate their professors on ‘hotness.’ Not any more. Retrieved Oct 4, 2018 from https://www.thestate.com/news/local/education/article214552980.html
   Google Scholar
• Davison, E., & Price, J. (2009). How do we rate? an evaluation of online student evaluations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 51–65. doi:10.1080/02602930801895695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deo, M. E. (2015). A better tenure battle: Fighting bias in teaching evaluations (the more things change: Exploring solutions to persisting discrimination in legal academia. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 31(1), 7. doi:10.7916/D8D79PXZ’
   Google Scholar
• Dunegan, K. J., & Hrivnak, M. W. (2003). Characteristics of mindless teaching evaluations and the moderating effects of image compatibility. Journal of Management Education, 27(3), 280–303. doi:10.1177/1052562903027003002
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., & Wahl, S. T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 56(3), 255–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., Shepherd, L. J., Slavich, E., Waters, D., Stone, M., Abel, R., & Johnston, E. L. (2019). Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters. PLoS One, 14(2), 1–16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H. F. (2002). Evidence of halo effects in student evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education, 51, 225–236. doi:10.1080/03634520216519
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A., Statham, A., Richardson, L., & Cook, J. A. (1993). Gender and University Teaching: A negotiated difference. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(1), 117–120. doi:10.2307/2959986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton, J., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2004). Web-based student evaluations of professors: The relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 91–108. doi:10.1080/0260293032000158180
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 473. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty, C. (2018). Bye, bye chili pepper. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/07/02/rate-my-professors-ditches-its-chili-pepper-hotness-quotient
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, C., Merrill, G., & Kline, D. (2012). Are student evaluations of teaching effectiveness valid for measuring student outcomes in business related classes? A neural network and Bayesian analyses. Research in Higher Education, 53(3), 353–374. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9229-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, M., & Salomons, A. (2017). Measuring teaching quality in higher education: Assessing selection bias in course evaluations. Research in Higher Education, 58(4), 341–364. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9429-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1209–1217. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.52.11.1209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(6), 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81–92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(3), 360–372. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(79)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R., & Crews, A. D. (2013). My professor is hot! correlates of RateMyProfessors.com ratings for criminal justice and criminology faculty members. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 639–656. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9186-y
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., Brace, C. L., Jankowiak, W., Laland, K. N., Musselman, L. E., Langlois, J. H., … Symons, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36(5), 723. doi:10.1086/204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. 1994-37261-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617. doi:10.1177/000312240607100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalick, S. M. (1988). Physical attractiveness as a status cue. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(6), 469–489. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(88)90047-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Damewood, E., & Hodge, N. (2000). Professor attitude: Its effect on teaching evaluations. Journal of Management Education, 24(4), 458–473. doi:10.1177/105256290002400405
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2018). Lean in messages increase attributions of women’s responsibility for gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 974–1001. doi:10.1037/pspa0000129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowai-Bell, N., Guadagno, R. E., Little, T., Preiss, N., & Hensley, R. (2011). Rate my expectations: How online evaluations of professors impact students’ perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1862–1867. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., Howland, L., Russell, A. G., & Jackman, L. M. (2017). The effects of implicit gender role theories on gender system justification: Fixed beliefs strengthen masculinity to preserve the status quo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 98–115. doi:10.1037/pspp0000124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., Cerruti, C., Shin, J.-E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. A., … Nosek, B. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1765–1785. doi:10.1037/a0036260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. K., Skinner, A. L., Cooley, E., Murrar, S., Brauer, M., Devos, T., … Nosek, B. A. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 1001–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, G. W., Jr., Higgins, E., & Nardone, N. N. (2012). Just a harmless website?: An experimental examination of RateMyProfessor.com’s effect on student evaluations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 987–1002. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.594497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303. doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). Student’s evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253–388. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M. A., & Jewell, R. T. (2007). Leveling the playing field: Should student evaluation scores be adjusted? Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 868–881. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengel, F., Sauermann, J., & Zölitz, U. (2018). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, doi:10.1093/jeea/jvx057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Chamberlin, M. (2000). Women are teachers, men are professors: A study of student perceptions. Teaching Sociology, 28(4), 283–298. doi:10.2307/1318580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. M. W., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. PS: Political Science and Politics, 51(3), 648–652. doi:10.1017/S104909651800001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montell, G. (2006). The art of the bogus rating. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/article/The-Arts-of-the-Bogus-Rating/46887/
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Hornsey, M. J. (2009). Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 653–664. doi:10.1037/a0012966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301–314. doi:10.1080/02602930701293231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., & Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. doi:10.1177/0146167210371949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, J., Sanford, D. A., & Ross, D. N. (2008). Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 355–368. doi:10.1080/02602930701293405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parigi, P., Santana, J. J., & Cook, K. S. (2017). Online field experiments: Studying social interactions in context. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80(1), 1–19. doi:10.1177/0190272516680842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punyanunt-Carter, N., & Carter, S. L. (2015). Students’ gender bias in teaching evaluations. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 28. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.234
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, A. S. (2018). Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: A large-scale study of RateMyProfessors.com data. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 31–44. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1276155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1315–1328. doi:10.1177/0146167200263001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salary.com. (2015). Assistant Professor – English. Retrieved from https://www.salary.com/
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead (1st ed.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B. (2015). Gendered Language in Teaching Reviews. Retrieved from http://benschmidt.org/profGender/
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1329–1342. doi:10.1177/0146167200263002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohr-Preston, S., Boswell, S., McCaleb, K., & Robertson, D. (2016). Professor gender, age, and “Hotness” in influencing college students’ generation and interpretation of professor ratings. Higher Learning Research Communications, 6(3). Retrieved from doi:10.18870/hlrc.v6i3.328
   Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642. doi:10.3102/0034654313496870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storage, D., Horne, Z., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S.-J. (2016). The frequency of “brilliant” and “genius” in teaching evaluations predicts the representation of women and African Americans across fields. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150194. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2016-11626-001&login.asp&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, T. (2008). On the validity of RateMyProfessors.com. Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), 55–61. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.1.55-61
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., & Oberfield, A. A. (1991). Sources of organizational demography: Faculty sex ratios in colleges and universities. Sociology of Education, 64(4), 305–315. doi:10.2307/2112710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. College News. (2015). National University Ratings. Retrieved from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A. (2012). Average granting council awards per faculty member, by discipline. Retrieved from http://higheredstrategy.com/research-grants-by-discipline/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. A. (2008). A consideration of tenure and its effect on women faculty members: A proposal for increasing parity between men and women on college campuses. Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford round Table, 1–33.
   Google Scholar