959
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Impact of Negative Gossip on Target and Receiver. A “Big Two” Analysis

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Abele, A. E., & Hauke, N. (2019). Comparing the facets of the Big Two in global evaluation of self versus other people. European Journal of Social Psychology, doi:10.1002/ejsp.2639
  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2018). Agency and communion in social psychology. London: Routledge.
  • Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1063–1065. doi:10.1002/ejsp.574
  • Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. P. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness - communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1810. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Baker, R., & Guttfreund, D. (1993). The effects of written autobiographical recollection induction procedures on mood. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 563–568. doi:10.1002/1097-4679
  • Baumeister, R. F. (1999). The self in social psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 642–649. doi:10.1177/1948550611405073
  • Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2640–2670. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00956.x
  • Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip (J. J. Bednarz, Trans.). New York: Aldine de Gruyter. (Original work published 1987)
  • Blumberg, H. H. (1972). Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 157–162. doi:10.1037/h0033027
  • Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32(4), 397–408. doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
  • Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45(5), 347–356. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000176
  • Dunbar, R. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100
  • Dunbar, R. M., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231–246. doi:10.1007/BF02912493
  • Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644
  • Ellemers, N. (2017). Morality and the regulation of social behavior: Groups as moral anchors. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.
  • Emler, N. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Ze'ev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 117–138). Lawrence, KS, US: University Press of Kansas.
  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656–664. doi:10.1177/0956797613510184
  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., & Keltner, D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1015–1030. doi:10.1037/a0026650
  • Fingelkurts, A. A., & Fingelkurts, A. A. (2017). Three-dimensional components of selfhood in treatment-naive patients with major depressive disorder: A resting-state qEEG imaging study. Neuropsychologia, 99, 30–36. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.020
  • Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Kallio-Tamminen, T. (2016). Trait lasting alteration of the brain default mode network in experienced meditators and the experiential selfhood. Self and Identity, 15(4), 381–393. doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1136351
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Fonseca, M. A., & Peters, K. (2018). Will any gossip do? Gossip does not need to be perfectly accurate to promote trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 107, 253–281. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.015
  • Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78
  • Goldsmith, D. J., & Baxter, L. A. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 87–114. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00388.x
  • Harinck, F., & Ellemers, N. (2014). How values change a conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu (Ed.), Social conflict within and between groups. (pp. 19–36). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Hauke, N., & Abele, A. E. (2019). Two faces of the self: Actor-self perspective and observer-self perspective are differentially related to agency versus communion. Self and Identity, 1. doi:10.1080/15298868.2019.1584582
  • Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 336–355). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgement: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899–913. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899.
  • Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2015). Forecasting the primary dimension of social perception: Symbolic and realistic threats together predict warmth in the stereotype content model. Social Psychology, 46(1), 36–45. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000219
  • Kuttler, A. F., Parker, J. G., & La Greca, A. M. (2002). Developmental and gender differences in preadolescents' judgments of the veracity of gossip. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48(2), 105–132. doi:10.1353/mpq.2002.0008
  • Pagliaro, S., Ellemers, N., Barreto, M., & Di Cesare, C. (2016). Once dishonest, always dishonest? The impact of perceived pervasiveness of moral evaluations of the self on motivation to restore a moral reputation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 586. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00586
  • Paulhus, D. L., & Trapnell, P. D. (2008). Self-presentation of personality: An agency-communion framework. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 492–517). New York, NY US: Guilford Press.
  • Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1025–1060. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00041
  • Peeters, G. (2008). The evaluative face of a descriptive model: Communion and agency in Peabody’s tetradic model of trait organization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1066–1072. doi:10.1002/ejsp.524
  • Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2014). Gossiping as moral social action: A functionalist account of gossiper perceptions. In J. P. Forgas, O. Vincze, & J. László (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 185–201). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.
  • Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2015). Bad habit or social good? How perceptions of gossiper morality are related to gossip content. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(6), 784–798. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2123
  • Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 880–892. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880
  • Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 487–510. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
  • Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(44), 17435–17440. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704598104
  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The personal attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.624
  • Trafimow, D., & Rice, S. (2009). A test of the null hypothesis significance testing procedure correlation argument. The Journal of General Psychology, 136(3), 261–269. doi:10.3200/GENP.136.3.261-270
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
  • Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1115–1125. doi:10.1177/01461672992512005
  • Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 122–137. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.122
  • Williams, H. L., Conway, M. A., & Cohen, G. (2008). Autobiographical memory. In G. Cohen & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Memory in the real world (3rd ed., pp. 21–90). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Wilson, D. S., Wilczynski, C., Wells, A., & Weiser, L. (2000). Gossip and other aspects of language as group-level adaptations. In C. Heyes, & L. Huber (Eds.), The evolution of cognition (pp. 347–365). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
  • Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 155–188. doi:10.1080/10463280500229619
  • Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self‐esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 617–627. doi:10.1002/ejsp.791
  • Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A.M. (2015). When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 923–930. doi:10.1177/1948550615595272
  • Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Burnstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1083–1092. doi:10.1002/ejsp.559
  • Ybarra, O., Park, H., Stanik, C., & Lee, D. (2012). Self-judgment and reputation monitoring as a function of the fundamental dimensions, temporal perspective, and culture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 200–209. doi:10.1002/ejsp.854

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.