Elusive Alpha and Beta Control in a Multicausal World

References

• Chan, E., Ybarra, O., & Schwarz, N. (2006). Reversing the affective congruency effect: The role of target word frequency of occurrence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(3), 365–372. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danner, D., Hagemann, D., & Fiedler, K. (2015). Mediation analysis with structural equation models: Combining theory, design, and statistics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(4), 460–481. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 163–171. doi:10.1177/1745691611400237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K. (2017). What constitutes strong psychological science? The (neglected) role of diagnosticity and a priori theorizing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 46–61. doi:10.1177/1745691616654458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., Bluemke, M., & Unkelbach, C. (2011). On the adaptive flexibility of evaluative priming. Memory & Cognition, 39(4), 557–572. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0056-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., Harris, C., & Schott, M. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests—An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1236. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freytag, P., Bluemke, M., & Fiedler, K. (2011). An adaptive-learning approach to affect regulation: Strategic influences on evaluative priming. Cognition & Emotion, 25(3), 426–439. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.537081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., Sheeran, P., Trötschel, R., & Webb, T. L. (2011). Self-regulation of priming effects on behavior. Psychological Science, 22(7), 901–907. doi:10.1177/0956797611411586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, D. W., Thielmann, I., Klein, S. A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2019). On the limited generality of air pollution and anxiety as causal determinants of unethical behavior. Germany: Psychological Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, D., Spruyt, A., & Eelen, P. (2003). Automatic affective priming of recently acquired stimulus valence: Priming at SOA 300 but not at SOA 1000. Cognition and Emotion, 17(1), 83–99. doi:10.1080/02699930302276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, D. R., White, K. R., Jabeen, L. N., Hinojos, M., Terrazas, G., Reyes, S. M., … Crites, S. L. Jr. (2013). On the automatic activation of attitudes: A quarter century of evaluative priming research. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1062–1089. doi:10.1037/a0031309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (2002). Goal-dependent and goal-independent effects of irrelevant evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 802–814. doi:10.1177/0146167202289009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K.C., Rossnagel, C., & Musch, J. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 246–255. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.1.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, J. (2001). Null hypothesis significance testing: On the survival of a flawed method. American Psychologist, 56(1), 16–26. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.1.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. G., Lee, J. J., Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Polluted morality: Air pollution predicts criminal activity and unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 29(3), 340–355. doi:10.1177/0956797617735807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). p-Curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. doi:10.1177/1745691614553988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2008). The affective regulation of cognitive priming. Emotion, 8(2), 208–215. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2003). Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes’s theorem. Psychological Review, 110(3), 526–535. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2019a). A taxonomy of model assumptions on which P is based and implications for added benefit in the sciences. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 571–583. doi:10.1080/13645579.2019.1610592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2019b). Five nonobvious changes in editorial practice for editors and reviewers to consider when evaluating submissions in a post p < .05 universe. The American Statistician, 73(Supp 1), 340–345.
   Google Scholar
• Wacker, J. (2017). Increasing the reproducibility of science through close cooperation and forking path analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1332. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R.L., Schirm, A.L., & Lazar, N.A. (2019). Moving to a world beyond p < .05. The American Statistician, 73(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., & Fishbach, A. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 493–504. doi:10.1037/pspa0000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar