There is Nothing Magical about Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction to Epistemic Probabilities in Data Analysis for Psychology Starters

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Badenes-Ribera, L., Frias-Navarro, D., Iotti, B., Bonilla-Campos, A., & Longobardi, C. (2016). Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, P. S., & Brittan, G. (2010). Two dogmas of strong objective Bayesianism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 24(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903467119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. (2004). The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis. Statistical Science, 19(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayes, T., & Price, M. (1763). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, FRS communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, AMFRS, Philosophical Transactions (1683–1775) (pp. 370–418). Royal Society Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., De Boeck, P., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O. (2000). Bayesian analysis: A look at today and thoughts of tomorrow. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(452), 1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10474328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O. (2006). The case for objective Bayesian analysis. Bayesian Analysis, 1(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1214/06-BA115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., & Berry, D. A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American Scientist, 76(2), 159–165. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27855070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. F. (1982). What is this thing called science?: An assessment of the nature and status of science and its methods (2nd ed.) University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatard, A., Bocage-Barthélémy, Y., Selimbegović, L., & Guimond, S. (2017). The woman who wasn’t there: Converging evidence that subliminal social comparison affects self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. D. (2014). The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han LJ van der Maas]. Acta Psychologica, 148, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes Factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 78, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2017, March 23–25). Conventions for using Bayes Factors [Paper presentation]. International Convention of Psychological Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2019). How do I know what my theory predicts?. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919876960
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Mclatchie, N. (2018). Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing. Psychomonic Bulletin & Review, 25, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1266-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70(3), 193–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). A Bayesian perspective on the reproducibility project: Psychology. Plos One, 11(2), e0149794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Introduction to Bayesian inference for Psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1262-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1956). Statistical methods and scientific inference. Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2004). Mind the gap: In praise of informal sources of formal theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_6 
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116(2), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamerman, D., & Lopes, H. F. (2006). Markov chain Monte Carlo: stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2008). Objections to Bayesian statistics. Bayesian Analysis, 3(3), 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-BA318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2011). Induction and deduction in Bayesian data analysis. Rationality, Markets and Morals, 2, 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hennig, C. (2017). Beyond subjective and objective in statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)), 180(4), 967–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013). Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 8–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 311–339). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Marewski, J. N. (2015). Surrogate science: The idol of a universal method for scientific inference. Journal of Management, 41(2), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314547522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S. & Vitouch,  (2004). The Null Ritual: What you always wanted to know about significance testing but were afraid to ask. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 391–408)Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, M. (2006). Subjective Bayesian analysis: Principles and practice. Bayesian Analysis, 1(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1214/06-BA116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronau, Q. F., Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). Informed Bayesian t-tests. The American Statistician, 74(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1562983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, H., & Chow, S.-M. (2017). Bayesian hypothesis testing: Editorial to the Special Issue on Bayesian data analysis. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., Maxwell, S. E., & Fleming, K. J. (2000). The proof of the pudding: An illustration of the relative strengths of null hypothesis, meta-analysis, and Bayesian analysis. Psychological Methods, 5(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.5.3.315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.2) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jefferys, W. H., & Berger, J. O. (1992). Ockham’s razor and Bayesian analysis. American Scientist, 80(1), 64–72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29774559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. E. (2013). Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(48), 19313–19317. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313476110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Witte, E. H., & Zenker, F. (2018). Hypothesis-testing demands trustworthy data-A simulation approach to inferential statistics advocating the research program strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 460. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2014). Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018a). Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018b). The Bayesian new statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 178–206. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D., Adolfi, F. G., Albers, C. J., Anvari, F., Apps, M. A. J., Argamon, S. E., Baguley, T., Becker, R. B., Benning, S. D., Bradford, D. E., Buchanan, E. M., Caldwell, A. R., Van Calster, B., Carlsson, R., Chen, S.-C., Chung, B., Colling, L. J., Collins, G. S., Crook, Z., … Zwaan, R. A. (2018). Justify your alpha. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(3), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0311-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplace, P. S. (1814). Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilities [A philosophical essay on probabilities]. Courcier.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, F., Paulo, R., Molina, G., Clyde, M. A., & Berger, J. O. (2008). Mixtures of g-priors for Bayesian variable selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(481), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214507000001337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. V. (2000). The philosophy of statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (the Statistician), 49(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00238
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in psychological science. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. C., & Aitkin, M. (2008). Bayes Factors: Prior sensitivity and model generalizability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewyckx, T., Kim, W., Lee, M. D., Tuerlinckx, F., Kuppens, P., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). A tutorial on Bayes Factor estimation with the product space method. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(5), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, D. J., Jackson, C., Best, N., Thomas, A., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2012). The BUGS book: A practical introduction to Bayesian analysis. CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1086/288135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 806–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2015, January 30). On verbal categories for the interpretation of Bayes Factor. An R package on Bayesian data analysis. http://bayesfactor.blogspot.com/2015/01/on-verbal-categories-for-interpretation.html
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2017, March 23–25). Bayes Factors, BayesFactor and 'default' priors [Paper presentation]. International Convention of Psychological Science.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2011). Bayes Factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 16(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2015). BayesFactor R package (Version 0.9.12-2) [Computer Software].
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., Homer, S., & Proulx, T. (2018). Beyond statistics: Accepting the null hypothesis in mature sciences. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918776023
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., Romeijn, J.-W., & Rouder, J. N. (2016). The philosophy of Bayes Factors and the quantification of statistical evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Pratte, M. S., & Speckman, P. L. (2011). Using MCMC chain outputs to efficiently estimate Bayes Factors. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(5), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Editors’ introduction to the special issue “Bayes Factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: Practical relevance and new developments”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 78, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, I. J., & Pitt, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam’s razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 231, 289–337. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1933.0009
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N. (2014). Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0595-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 573–604. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2012). Default Bayes Factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(6), 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.734737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes Factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Province, J. M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2016). Is there a free lunch in inference? Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(3), 520–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röver, C. (2020). Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 93(6), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v093.i06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017). Bayes Factor Design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 128–142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes Factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., Carlsson, R., Cheung, F., Christensen, G., Clay, R., Craig, M. A., Dalla Rosa, A., Dam, L., Evans, M. H., Flores Cervantes, I., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many analysts, one data set: Making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger, J. (2018). The objectivity of subjective Bayesianism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(3), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0200-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stefan, A., Schönbrodt, F. D. (2017, January 17). Two meanings of priors, part II: Quantifying uncertainty about model parameters. http://www.nicebread.de/two-meanings-of-priors-2/
   Google Scholar
• Świątkowski, W., & Dompnier, B. (2017). Replicability crisis in social psychology: Looking at the past to find new pathways for the future. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Kaplan, D., Denissen, J., Asendorpf, J. B., Neyer, F. J., & Aken, M. A. (2014). A gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: Applications to developmental research. Child Development, 85(3), 842–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Winter, S. D., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Depaoli, S. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Mises, R. V. (1957). Probability, statistics, and truth. Dover Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., Lee, M., Lodewyckx, T., & Iverson, G. J. (2008). Bayesian versus frequentist inference. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, & P. A. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (pp. 181–207). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E.-J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., … Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for ANOVA designs. The American Statistician, 66(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.695956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406923
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: a flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 752–760. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Bååth, R. A., & Philipp, M. C. (2017). Using Bayes Factors to test hypotheses in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 14(4), 321–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2017.1370964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. (2010). In defence of objective Bayesianism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, E. H., & Zenker, F. (2017). From discovery to justification: Outline of an ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar