http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-6076
References
- Eren, M. I., Lycett, S. J., Patten, R. J., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J., & O’Brien, M. J. (2016). Test, model, and method validation: The role of experimental stone artifact replication in hypothesis-driven archaeology. Ethnoarchaeology, 8, 103–136. doi: 10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972
- Eren, M. I., Patten, R. J., O’Brien, M. J., & Meltzer, D. J. (2013). Refuting the technological cornerstone of the Ice-Age Atlantic crossing hypothesis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 2934–2941. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.02.031
- Eren, M. I., Patten, R. J., O’Brien, M. J., & Meltzer, D. J. (2014). More on the rumor of “intentional overshot flaking” and the purported Ice-Age Atlantic crossing. Lithic Technology, 39, 55–63. doi: 10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000033
- Justice, N. (1987). Stone Age spear and arrow points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States: A modern survey and reference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Justice, N., & Kudlaty, S. (1999). Field guide to projectile points of the Midwest. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Marwick, B., Guedes, J., Barton, C., Bates, L., Baxter, M., Bevan, A., … Wren, C. (2017). Open science in archaeology. SAA Archaeological Record, 17, 8–14.
- Marwick, B., & Jacobs, Z. (2017, July 20). Here’s the three-pronged approach we’re using in our own research to tackle the reproducibility issue. The Conversation, 1–5.
- Ram, K., & Marwick, B. (2017). Building toward a future where reproducible, open science is the norm. In J. Kitzes, D. Turkey, & F. Deniz (Eds.), The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences (pp. 61–70). Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Shane, O. C. (1967). The Mixter site: A multicomponent hunting station in Erie County, Ohio. In O. Prufer & D. McKenzie (Eds.), Studies in Ohio archaeology (pp. 121–186). Cleveland, OH: The Press of Western Reserve University.