Techno-Functional Implication on the Production of Discoid and Levallois Backed Implements

References

• Adler, D. S., Wilkinson, K. N., Blockley, S., Mark, D. F., Pinhasi, R., Schmidt-Magee, B. A., Nahapetyan, S., Mallol, C., Berna, F., Glauberman, P. J., Raczynski-Henk, Y., Wales, N., Frahm, E., Joris, O., MacLeod, A., Smith, V. C., Cullen, V. L., & Gasparian, B. (2014). Early levallois technology and the lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus. Science, 345(6204), 1609–1613. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, W., Djakovic, I., Brenet, M., Bourguignon, L., Presnyakova, D., Schlager, S., Soressi, M., & McPherron, S. P. (2021). Quantifying differences in hominin flaking technologies with 3D shape analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 150, 102912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrighi, S., Freguglia, M., Ranaldo, F., & Ronchitelli, A. (2009). Production and use in the lithic industry of the Mousterian in Santa Croce (Bisceglie, Italy). Human Evolution, 24(2), 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Benazzi, S., Bailey, S. E., Peresani, M., Mannino, M. A., Romandini, M., Richards, M. P., & Hublin, J. (2014). Middle Paleolithic and Uluzzian human remains from Fumane. Journal of Human Evolution, 70, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyries, S., & Boëda, E. (1983). Etude technologique et traces d’utilisation des “éclats dèbordants” de Corbéhem (Pas-de-Calais). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 80(9), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1983.5455
   Google Scholar
• Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1969). Stone tools and human behavior. Scientific American, 220(4), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0469-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boëda, E. (1986). Approche technologique du concept Levallois et évaluation de son champ d’application: étude de trois gisement saaliens et weichséliens de la France septentrionale [Thesis]. Université de Paris. X-Nanterre. http://www.theses.fr/1986PA100092
   Google Scholar
• Boëda, E. (1993). Le débitage discoïde et le débitage Levallois récurrent centripète. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 90(6), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1993.9669
   Google Scholar
• Boëda, E. (1994). Le concept Levallois: Variabilité des méthodes. C.N.R.S.
   Google Scholar
• Boëda, E. (1995). Caractéristiques techniques des chaînes opératoires lithiques des niveaux micoquiens de külna (Tchécoslovaquie). Paléo, Revue D'Archéologie Préhistorique, 1(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1995.1380
   Google Scholar
• Boëda, E. (2013). Techno-logique & Technologie. Une Paléo-histoire des objets lithiques tranchants. @rchéo-éditions.com.
   Google Scholar
• Boëda, E., Geneste, J., & Meignen, L. (1990). Identification de chaînes opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paléo, 2(1), 43–80. https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1990.988
   Google Scholar
• Bonilauri, S. (2010). Les outils du Paléolithique moyen : une mémoire technique oubliée ? Approche techno-fonctionnelle appliquée à un assemblage lithique de conception Levallois provenant du site d’Umm el Tlel (Syrie centrale) [Doctoral Thesis]. Université Paris X- Nanterre. http://www.theses.fr/2010PA100183
   Google Scholar
• Bordes, F., & De Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1970). The significance of variability in Paleolithic assemblages. World Archaeology, 2(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1970.9979464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, L., Brenet, M., Folgado, M., & Ortega, I. (2011). Aproximación tecno-económica del debitage discoide de puntas pseudo-Levallois: el aporte de la experimentación. In A. Morgado, J. Baena Preysler, & D. Garcia gonzalez (Eds.), La Investigación Experimental aplicada a la Arqueología (pp. 53–59). Imprenta Galindo.
   Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, L., Sellami, F., Deloze, V., Sellier-Segard, N., Beyries, S., & Émery-Barbier, A. (2002). L’habitat moustérien de « La Folie » (Poitiers, Vienne) : Synthèse des premiers résultats. Paléo, 14(14), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.4000/paleo.1389
   Google Scholar
• Bourguignon, L., & Turq, A. (2003). Une chaine opératoire de débitage discoide sur eclat du Mousterien à denticules Aquitain: les exemples des Champ Bossuet et de Combe-Grenal c.14. In M. Peresani (Ed.), Discoid lithic technology. Advances and implications (pp. 131–152). British Archaeological Reports International Series.
   Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P. J., & Kuhn, S. L. (2001). Constraints on levallois core technology: A mathematical model. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(7), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2000.0594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenet, M., Bourguignon, L., Folgado, M., & Ortega, I. (2009). Élaboration d’un protocole d’expérimentation lithique pour la compréhension des comportements techniques et techno-économiques au Paléolithique moyen. Les Nouv. l’archéologie, 118(118). https://doi.org/10.4000/nda.941
   Google Scholar
• Brenet, M., Folgado, M., & Bourguignon, L. (2013). Approche expérimentale de la variabilité des industries du Paléolithique moyen : l’intérêt d’évaluer les niveaux de compétence et d’efficience des expérimentateurs. In A. Palomo, R. Piqué, & X. Terradas (Eds.), Experimentación En Arqueología. Estudio y Difusión Del Pasado (pp. 77–182). Museu d'Arqueologia de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Broglio, A., Tagliacozzo, A., De stefani, M., Gurioli, F., & Facciolo, A. (2006). Aurignacian dwelling structures, hunting strategies and seasonality in the Fumane cave (Lessini Mountains). In M. V. Anikovich & N. I. Platonova (Eds.), Kostienki & the early upper Palaeolithic of Eurasia: General trends, local developments. State archaeological museum-reserve “Kostenki” (pp. 263–268). Russian academy of sciences. Institute for the material culture history.
   Google Scholar
• Conard, N. J., & Richter, J. (2011). Neanderthal Lifeways, subsistence and technology, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0415-2
   Google Scholar
• Cziesla, E., Eickhoff, S., Arts, N., & Winter, D. (1990). The big puzzle. International symposium on refitting stone artefacts, Monrepos, 1987 (Studies in modern archaeology). Holos.
   Google Scholar
• Daffara, S., Borel, A., & Moncel, M.-H. (2019). Conditioning of the raw materials on discoid exploitation strategies during the early Middle Palaeolithic: The example of Payre level D (South-East France). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 4681–4695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00823-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delagnes, A., & Rendu, W. (2011). Shifts in Neandertal mobility, technology and subsistence strategies in western France. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(8), 1771–1783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpiano, D. (2020). L’analisi degli strumenti a dorso del Paleolitico Medio come mezzo per indagare le strategie comportamentali e le tradizioni tecnologiche degli ultimi Neanderthal europei [Tesi di dottorato]. Università di Ferrara. Biblioteca del Museo Piero Leonardi dell'Università degli Studi di Ferrara.
   Google Scholar
• Delpiano, D., Cocilova, A., Zangrossi, F., & Peresani, M. (2019). Potentialities of the virtual analysis of lithic refitting: Case studies from the Middle and upper Paleolithic. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(11), 4467–4489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00779-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpiano, D., Heasley, K., & Peresani, M. (2018). Assessing neanderthal land use and lithic raw material management in discoid technology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 96(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.4436/jass.96006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpiano, D., & Peresani, M. (2017). Exploring Neanderthal skills and lithic economy. The implication of a refitted Discoid reduction sequence reconstructed using 3D virtual analysis. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 16(8) 865–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2017.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpiano, D., & Uthmeier, T. (2020). Techno-functional and 3D shape analysis applied for investigating the variability of backed tools in the late Middle Paleolithic of Central Europe. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0236548. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpiano, D., Zupancich, A., & Peresani, M. (2019). Innovative Neanderthals: Results from an integrated analytical approach applied to backed stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, 110, 105011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2019.105011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic Scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 52(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/281062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eixea, A., Villaverde, V., & Zilhão, J. (2016). Not only flint: Levallois on quartzite and limestone at Abrigo de la Quebrada (Valencia, Spain): Implications for Neandertal behavior. Journal of Anthropological Research, 72(1), 24–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/685265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., & Lycett, S. J. (2012). Why Levallois ? A morphometric comparison of experimental ‘ preferential ‘ Levallois flakes versus Debitage flakes. PLoS One, 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., & Lycett, S. J. (2016). A statistical examination of flake edge angles produced during experimental lineal Levallois reductions and consideration of their functional implications. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9245-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, M. I., Lycett, S. J., Roos, C. I., & Sampson, C. G. (2011). Toolstone constraints on knapping skill : Levallois reduction with two different raw materials. Journal of Archaeological Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcucci, A., Conard, N. J., & Peresani, M. (2017). A critical assessment of the Protoaurignacian lithic technology at Fumane cave and its implications for the definition of the earliest Aurignacian. PLoS One, 12(12), e0189241.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, I., Gala, M., & Tagliacozzo, A. (2004). Ecology and subsistence strategies in the Eastern Italian Alps during the Middle Palaeolithic. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 14(34), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneste, J. (1985). Analyse d’industries Moustériennes du Périgord: une approche technologique du comportement des groupes humains au Paléolithique moyen [Doctoral Thesis]. Université de Bordeaux I.
   Google Scholar
• Gennai, J. (2017). Il Levallois laminare di Grotta di Fumane (VR) nel quadro del Musteriano Finale italiano [MA Thesis]. Università di Ferrara. http://lnx.pubblitesi.it/
   Google Scholar
• González-Molina, I., Jiménez-García, B., Maíllo-Fernández, J.-M., Baquedano, E., & Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (2020). Distinguishing Discoid and centripetal Levallois methods through machine learning. PLoS One, 15, e0244288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravina, B., & Discamps, E. (2015). MTA-B or not to be? Recycled bifaces and shifting hunting strategies at Le Moustier and their implication for the late Middle Palaeolithic in southwestern France. Journal of Human Evolution, 84, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S. (1996). Mousterian reduction sequences in central Italy. In A. Bietti, & S. Grimaldi (Eds.), Reduction Processes (Châines Opératoires) in the European Mousterian (pp. 279–310). Quaternaria Nova.
   Google Scholar
• Guette, C. (2002). Révision critique du concept de débitage Levallois à travers l’étude du gisement moustérien de Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue/le Fort (Chantiers I-III et II, niveaux inférieurs) (Manche, France). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2002.12655
   Google Scholar
• Harvati, K., & Harrison, T., (Eds.), (2006). Neanderthals revisited: New approaches and perspectives, vertebrate paleobiology and paleoanthropology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5121-0
   Google Scholar
• Herzlinger, G., & Grosman, L. (2018). AGMT3-D: a software for 3-D landmarks-based geometric morphometric shape analysis of archaeological artifacts. PLoS One, 13(11), e0207890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöris, O. (2006). Bifacially backed knives (Keilmesser) in the central European Middle Palaeolithic. In N. Goren-Inbar & G. Sharon (Eds.), Axe age, acheulian toolmaking from quarry to discard (pp. 287–310). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Key, A. J. M. (2016). Integrating mechanical and ergonomic research within functional and morphological analyses of lithic cutting technology: Key principles and future experimental directions. Ethnoarchaeology, 8(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2016.1150626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A. J. M., & Lycett, S. J. (2014). Are bigger flakes always better? An experimental assessment of flake size variation on cutting efficiency and loading. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41, 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A. J. M., & Lycett, S. J. (2015). Edge angle as a variably influential factor in flake cutting efficiency: An experimental investigation of its relationship with tool size and loading. Archaeometry, 57(5), 911–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, A. J. M., Proffitt, T., Stefani, E., & Lycett, S. J. (2016). Looking at handaxes from another angle : Assessing the ergonomic and functional importance of edge form in Acheulean bifaces. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 44, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemonnier, P. (1976). La description des chaînes opératoires: Contribution à l’analyse des systémes techniques. Techology Culture, 1, 100–151.
   Google Scholar
• Lemorini, C., Peresani, M., Rossetti, P., Malerba, G., & Giacobini, G. (2003). Technomorphological and use-wear functional analysis: An integrated approach to the study of a discoid industry. In M. Peresani (Ed.), Discoid lithic technology. Advances and implications (pp. 257–275). British Archaeological Reports International Series.
   Google Scholar
• Lepot, M. (1993). Approche techno-fonctionnelle de l’outillage lithique moustérien: essai de classification des parties actives en termes d’efficacité technique [Doctoral dissertation]. Université de Paris X- Nanterre.
   Google Scholar
• López-García, J. M., dalla Valle, C., Cremaschi, M., & Peresani, M. (2015). Reconstruction of the Neanderthal and modern human landscape and climate from the Fumane cave sequence (Verona, Italy) using small-mammal assemblages. Quaternary Science Reviews, 128, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J., & Eren, M. I. (2013a). Levallois lessons: The challenge of integrating mathematical models, quantitative experiments and the archaeological record. World Archaeology, 45(4), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2013.821670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J., & Eren, M. I. (2013b). Levallois economics : An examination of ‘ waste ‘ production in experimentally produced Levallois reduction sequences. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(5), 2384–2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett, S. J., Von Cramon-Taubadel, N., & Eren, M. I. (2016). Levallois: Potential implications for learning and cultural transmission capacities. Lithic Technology. https://doi.org/10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marciani, G., Arrighi, S., Aureli, D., Spagnolo, V., Boscato, P., & Ronchitelli, A. (2018). Middle Palaeolithic lithic tools: Techno-functional and use-wear analysis of target objects from SU 13 at the Oscurusciuto rock shelter, southern Italy. Journal of Lithic Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.2745
   Google Scholar
• Martellotta, E. F., Delpiano, D., Govoni, M., Nannini, N., Duches, R., & Peresani, M. (2020). The use of bone retouchers in a Mousterian context of Discoid lithic technology. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(9), 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01155-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, K., Ollé, A., Sala, R., & Vergés, J. (2003). Discoid technology and use-wear analysis from Abric Romani. In M. Peresani (Ed.), Discoid lithic technology. Advances and implications (pp. 241–256). British Archaeological Reports International Series.
   Google Scholar
• Mellars, P. (1965). Sequence and development of the Mousterian traditions in southwestern France. Nature, 205(4971), 626–627. https://doi.org/10.1038/205626a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncel, M., & Daujeard, C. (2012). The variability of the Middle Palaeolithic on the right bank of the Middle Rhône Valley (southeast France): technical traditions or functional choices ? Quaternary International, 247, 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2010.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnier, G. F., & Missal, K. (2014). Another mousterian debate? Bordian facies, chaîne opératoire technocomplexes, and patterns of lithic variability in the Western European Middle and Upper Pleistocene. Quaternary International, 350, 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.06.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourre, V. (2003). Discoïde ou pas discoïde? Réflexions sur la pertinence des critères techniques définissant le débitage discoïde. In M. Peresani (Ed.), Discoid lithic technology: Advances and implications (pp. 1–18). British Archaeological Reports International Series.
   Google Scholar
• Peresani, M. (1998). La variabilité du débitage discoïde dans la grotte de Fumane (Italie du Nord). Paléo, 10(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1998.1133
   Google Scholar
• Peresani, M. (2003). Discoid lithic technology: Advances and implications. Archaeopre. ed. British Archaeological Reports International Series.
   Google Scholar
• Peresani, M. (2012). Fifty thousand years of flint knapping and tool shaping across the Mousterian and Uluzzian sequence of Fumane cave. Quaternary International, 247, 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peresani, M., Cremaschi, M., Ferraro, F., Falguères, C., Bahain, J. J., Gruppioni, G., Sibilia, E., Quarta, G., Calcagnile, L., & Dolo, J. M. (2008). Age of the final Middle Palaeolithic and Uluzzian levels at Fumane cave, Northern Italy, using 14C, ESR, 234U/230Th and thermoluminescence methods. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(11), 2986–2996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peresani, M., Cristiani, E., & Romandini, M. (2016). The Uluzzian technology of Grotta di Fumane and its implication for reconstructing cultural dynamics in the Middle e Upper Palaeolithic transition of Western Eurasia. Journal of Human Evolution, 91, 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peresani, M., Delpiano, D., Duches, R., Gennai, J., Marcazzan, D., Nannini, N., Romandini, M., Aleo, A., & Cocilova, A. (2017). Il Musteriano delle unità A10 e A11 a Grotta di Fumane (VR). Risultati delle campagne di scavo 2014 e 2016. FOLD&R FastiOnLine Documents & Research(397), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Picin, A., & Vaquero, M. (2016). Flake productivity in the Levallois recurrent centripetal and discoid technologies: New insights from experimental and archaeological lithic series. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 8, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.062
   Google Scholar
• Plisson, H. (1988). Technologie et traceologie des outils lithiques Mousteriens en Union Sovietique: Les travaux de V.E. Shchelinskii. In M. Otte (Ed.), L’homme de Néandertal (Actes du Colloque International de Liège 4-7 décembre 1986. Vol. 31/4, pp. 121–168). ERAUL.
   Google Scholar
• Ranhorn, K. L., Braun, D. R., Biermann Gürbüz, R. E., Greiner, E., Wawrzyniak, D., & Brooks, A. S. (2019). Evaluating prepared core assemblages with three-dimensional methods: A case study from the Middle Paleolithic at Skhūl (Israel). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(7), 3225–3238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0746-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland, N. (1981). The interpretation of Middle Palaeolithic variability. Man, 16(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801973
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, N. (1988). Observations on some Middle Paleolithic time series in southern France. In H. L. Dibble & A. Montet-White (Eds.), Upper Pleistocene prehistory of western Eurasia (pp. 161–180). University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Romagnoli, F., Bargalló, A., Chacon, M., Gomez de soler, B., & Vaquero, M. (2016). Testing a hypothesis about the importance of the quality of raw material on technological changes at Abric Romaní (Capellades, Spain): some considerations using high-resolution techno-economic perspective. Journal of Lithic Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v3i2.1443
   Google Scholar
• Romagnoli, F., Gómez de Soler, B., Bargalló, A., Chacón, M. G., & Vaquero, M. (2018). Here and now or a previously planned strategy? Rethinking the concept of ramification for micro-production in expedient contexts: Implications for Neanderthal socio-economic behaviour. Quaternary International, 474, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.12.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romandini, M., Nannini, N., Tagliacozzo, A., & Peresani, M. (2014). The ungulate assemblage from layer A9 at Grotta di Fumane, Italy: A zooarchaeological contribution to the reconstruction of Neanderthal ecology. Quaternary International, 337, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2009). The functional analysis of the Mousterian and Micoquian assemblages of Sesselfelsgrotte, Germany: Aspects of tool use and hafting in the European Late Middle Palaeolithic. Quartär, 56(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.7485/QU56_02
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2011). Tool use and hafting in the Western European Middle Palaeolithic. In M. Toussaint, K. Di Modica, & S. Pirson (Eds.), Le Paléolithique Moyen en Belgique. Mélanges Marguerite Ulrix-Closset (Vol. 128, pp. 277–287). ERAUL.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, V. (2013). Insights into early Middle Palaeolithic tool use and hafting in Western Europe. The functional analysis of level IIa of the early Middle Palaeolithic site of Biache-Saint-Vaast (France). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(1), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimelmitz, R., & Kuhn, S. L. (2018). The toolkit in the core: There is more to Levallois production than predetermination. Quaternary International, 464, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slimak, L. (2003). Les débitages discoïdes moustériens : évaluation d ‘un concept technologique. In M. Peresani (Ed.), Discoid lithic technology. Advances and implications (pp. 33–65). British Archaeological Reports International Series.
   Google Scholar
• Soressi, M. (2002). Le Moustérien de tradition acheuléenne du sud-ouest de la France [Doctoral dissertation]. Université de Bordeaux. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00573675
   Google Scholar
• Soressi, M., & Geneste, J. M. (2011). The history and efficacy of the Chaîne Opératoire approach to lithic analysis: Studying techniques to reveal past societies in an evolutionary perspective. PaleoAnthropology, Special Issue: Reduction Sequence, Chaîne Opératoire, and Other Methods:The Epistemologies of Different Approaches to Lithic Analysis, 334–350. https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2011.ART63
   Google Scholar
• Terradillos-Bernal, M., & Rodríguez, X.-P. (2012). The lower Palaeolithic on the northern plateau of the Iberian Peninsula (Sierra de Atapuerca, Ambrona and La Maya I): a technological analysis of the cutting edge and weight of artefacts. Developing an hypothetical model. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(5), 1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiébaut, C., Claud, É, Deschamps, M., Discamps, E., Soulier, M., Mussini, C., Costamagno, S., Rendu, W., Brenet, M., Colonge, D., Coudenneau, A., Gerbe, M., Guibert, P., Jaubert, J., Laroulandie, V., Maureille, B., Mourre, V., & Santos, F. (2014). Diversité des productions lithiques du Paléolithique moyen récent (OIS 4-OIS 3) : Enquête sur le rôle des facteurs environnementaux, fonctionnels et culturels. In J. Jaubert, N. Fourment, & P. Depaepe (Eds.), Transitions, Ruptures et Continuité En Préhistoire (pp. 281–296). Bordeaux - Les Eyzies.
   Google Scholar
• Tixier, J., Inizan, M.-L., & Roche, H. (1980). Préhistoire de la Pierre Taillée, Terminolog. ed. Valbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Turq, A., Faivre, J. P., Gravina, B., & Bourguignon, L. (2017). Building models of Neanderthal territories from raw material transports in the Aquitaine Basin (southwestern France). Quaternary International, 433, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.02.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turq, A., Roebroeks, W., Bourguignon, L., & Faivre, J. (2013). The fragmented character of Middle Palaeolithic stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution, 65(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallin, L., Masson, B., Caspar, J., & Depieroux, E. (2006). L’outil idéal. Analyse du standard Levallois des sites moustériens d’Hermies (Nord de la France). Paléo, 18(18), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.4000/paleo.347
   Google Scholar
• Viallet, C. (2019). A new method of three-dimensional morphometry for analyzing the functional potentialities of bifaces. Contribution to the study of artefacts from AU P3 from the “Caune de l’Arago” (France). Comptes Rendus Palevol, 18(2), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar