Morphologically Similar, but Regionally Distinct: Perdiz Arrow Points from Caddo Burial Contexts in the American Southeast

References

• Adams, D. C., & Cerney, M. M. (2007). Quantifying biomechanical motion using procrustes motion analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(2), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2007). Analysis of character divergence along environmental gradients and other covariates. Evolution, 61(3), 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00063.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2009). A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution, 63(5), 1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00649.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2015). Permutation tests for phylogenetic comparative analyses of high-dimensional shape data: What you shuffle matters. Evolution, 69(3), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, D. C., & Otárola-Castillo, E. (2013). geomorph: An R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(4), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. J., & Ter Braak, C. J. F. (2003). Permutation tests for multi-factoral analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 73(2), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650215733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnn III, Wesley J. (2012). Land of the Tejas: Native American identity and interaction in Texas, A.D. 1300–1700. The University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, I. I. I., & Philip, J. (1991). Dimensional standardization and production scale in Mesoamerican Ceramics. Latin American Antiquity, 2(4), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/971784
   Google Scholar
• Aynesworth, K. H. (1936). Flint arrowhead wounds of bones as shown in skeletons in Central Texas. Central Texas Archeological Society, 2, 74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Baken, E. K., Collyer, M. L., Kaliontzopoulou, A., & Adams, D. C. (2021). . Geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: Enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12(12), 2355–2363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. M. (2017). The Toyah complex of South and Central Texas: Long-range mobility and the emergence of dual economies. Plains Anthropologist, 62(242), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00320447.2016.1258858
   Google Scholar
• Chase, P. G. (1991). Symbols and paleolithic artifacts: Style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(91)90013-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. E. (1986). From mountains to molehills: A critical review of Teotihuacan's obsidian industry. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement, 2(1986), 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. B. (1995). Forty years of Archaeology in Central Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society, 66, 361–400.
   Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2007). Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic change in ecological studies. Ecology, 88(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2013). Phenotypic trajectory analysis: Comparison of shape change patterns in Evolution and ecology. Hystrix, 24(1), 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2018). RRPP: An R package for fitting linear models to high-dimensional data using residual randomization. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(7), 1772–1779. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. L., & Adams, D. C. (2020). Phylogenetically aligned component analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 12(2), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, M. L., Sekora, D. J., & Adams, D. C. (2015). A method for analysis of phenotypic change for phenotypes described by high-dimensional data. Heredity, 115(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2014.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costin, C. L. (2005). Craft production. In J. D. G. Maschner (Ed.), Handbook of archaeological methods (pp. 1034–1107). AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Densmore, J. A. (2007). A detailed analysis of the variation in morphology of the gary dart point. Lithic Technology, 32(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2007.11721040
   Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L. (1989). The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the lower and middle palaeolithic. The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, 1, 415–431.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. K. (1978). Early craft specialization: An example from the Balkan chalcolithic. In C. L. Redman, M. J. Berman, E. V. Curtin, W. T. Langhorne Jr, N. M. Versaggi, & J. C. Wanser (Eds.), Social archaeology: beyond subsistence and dating (pp. 113–129). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falsetti, A. B., Jungers, W. L., & Colle, T. M. (1993). Morphometrics of the callitrichid forelimb: A case study in size and shape. International Journal of Primatology, 14(4), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. R., Perttula, T. K., & Glascock, M. D. (2010). Dividing up the Caddo cultural landscape: Small-scale analysis of a large ceramic INAA database. In T. K. Perttula (Ed.), Studies on the instrumental neutron activation analysis of woodland and caddo tradition ceramics from Eastern Texas (pp. 1). Friends of Northeast Texas Archaeology.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, M. (1993). Contributions of individual taxa to overall morphological disparity. Paleobiology, 19(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300014056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandrud, C. (2014). Reproducible research with R and RStudio. The R series. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, C. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 53(2), 285–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01825.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower, J. C. (1975). Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. T., & Marwick, B. (2019). Truth, proof, and reproducibility: There’s no counter-attack for the codeless. In Statistics and Data Science, pp. 111-129. Communications in Computer and Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, M. A. (1979). The cognitive basis of productivity in a decorative art style: Implications of an ethnographic study for archaeologists’ taxonomies. Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, 75–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., & Renfrew, C. (1982). Symbols in action: Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jelks, E. B. (1962). The kyle site: A stratified Central Texas aspect site in Hill Country, Texas. Submitted to The University of Texas, Department of Anthropology, Archaeology Series, No. 5, Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. (1994). The life and times of toyah-culture folk: The Buckhollow Encampment Site 41KM16, Kimble County, Texas. Submitted to Texas Department of Transportation and Office of the State Archeologist Report 38. Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jungers, W. L., Falsetti, A. B., & Wall, C. E. (1995). Shape, relative size, and size-adjustments in morphometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 38(S21), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330380608
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C. M., & Keller, J. D. (1996). Cognition and tool use: The blacksmith at work. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. Charles. (1947). The Cultural affiliations and chronological position of the clear fork focus. American Antiquity, 13(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/275682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D. G. (1981). The statistics of shape. In V. Barnett (Ed.), Interpreting multivariate data (pp. 75–80). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16(2), 81–121. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/16.2.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg, C. P. (2013). Visualizations in geometric morphometrics: How to read and how to make graphs showing shape changes. Hystrix, 24, 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingenberg, C. P. (2016). Size, shape, and form: Concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Development Genes and Evolution, 226(3), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-016-0539-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVere, D. (1998). The Indians of Texas. Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lohse, J. C. (2009). Archaeological investigations on the Herd Ranch in Western Menard County, Texas. Submitted to Texas State University, San Marcos.
   Google Scholar
• Monnier, G. (2006). Testing retouched flake tool standardization during the Middle paleolithic: Patterns and implications. Transitions Before the Transition: Evolution and Stability in the Middle Stone Age, 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24661-4_4
   Google Scholar
• Mosimann, J. E. (1970). Size allometry: Size and shape variables with characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1970.10481136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newkumet, V. B., & Meredith, H. L. (1988). Hasinai: A traditional history of the Caddo confederacy. Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, A. (2002). Coincidental factors of handaxe morphology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(3), 413–414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02330073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. J., & Lyman, R. L (1999). Seriation, stratigraphy, and index fossils: The backbone of Archaeological dating. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perttula, T. K. (1992). “The Caddo nation": Archaeological and ethnohistoric perspectives. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perttula, T. K. (1993). Kee-Oh-Na-Wah'-Wah: The effects of European contact on the Caddoan Indians of Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma. In J. D. Rogers & S. M. Wilson (Eds.), Ethnohistory and archaeology: Approaches to postcontact change in the Americas (pp. 89–109). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Development Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Electronic resource, accessed June 27, 2022. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J. (1990). Morphometrics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21(1), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.001503
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification, 16(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003579900054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (1990). Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992207
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr. (2018a). Ceramic morphological organisation in the Southern Caddo Area: Quiddity of shape for hickory engraved bottles. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 21, 884–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.08.045
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr. (2018b). A preliminary study of smithport plain bottle morphology in the southern Caddo area. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society, 89, 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr. (2019). Ceramic morphological organisation in the Southern Caddo Area: The clarence H. Webb collections. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 35, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr. (2021a). An exploratory network analysis of the historic Caddo period in Northeast texas. In D. P. McKinnon, T. K. Perttula, & J. S. Girard (Eds.), Ancestral Caddo Ceramic traditions (pp. 240–257). LSU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr. (2021b). Louisiana limitrophe: An iterative morphological exegesis of Caddo bottle and biface production. In D. P. McKinnon, J. S. Girard, & T. K. Perttula (Eds.), Ancestral Caddo Ceramic traditions (pp. 258–276). LSU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr., & Dockall, J. E. (2022). Perdiz arrow points from Caddo burial contexts aid in defining discrete behavioral regions. SocArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr., Dockall, J. E., Britt Bousman, C., & Perttula, T. K. (2021). Shape as a function of time + raw material + burial context? An exploratory analysis of Perdiz arrow points from the ancestral Caddo area of the American southeast. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 37, 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102916
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr., Dockall, J. E., & Dubied, M. (2020). A quantitative assessment of intraspecific morphological variation in Gahagan bifaces from the southern Caddo area and central texas. Southeastern Archaeology, 39(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578X.2020.1744416
   Google Scholar
• Selden, R. Z., Jr., Dockall, J. E., & Shafer, H. J. (2018). Lithic morphological organisation: Gahagan bifaces from the Southern Caddo Area. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 10, e00080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00080
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, H. J. (1973). Lithic Technology at the George C. Davis Site, Cherokee County, Texas. Ph.D., Department of Anthropology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt, E., Gower, D. J., Klingenberg, C. P., & Wilkinson, M. (2014). Evolution of cranial shape in caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Evolutionary Biology, 41(4), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-014-9287-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinopoli, C. M. (1988). The organization of craft production at Vijayanagara, South India. American Anthropologist, 90(3), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1988.90.3.02a00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slice, D. E. (2001). Landmark coordinates aligned by procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Systematic Biology, 50(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150119110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollberger, J. B. (1971). A technological study of beveled knives. Plains Anthropologist, 16(53), 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Spielmann, K. A. (1991). Farmers, hunters, and colonists: Interaction between the Southwest and the southern plains. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suhm, D. A., & Jelks, E. B. (1962). Handbook of Texas archeology: Type descriptions. Special Publication No. 1. Texas Archeological Society and Bulletin No. 4, Texas Memorial Museum, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Suhm, D. A., Krieger, A. D., & Jelks, E. B. (1954). An introductory handbook of Texas archeology. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society, 25, 1–562.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, E. S., Hester, T. R., & McReynolds, R. L. (2011). Stone artifacts of Texas Indians: Completely revised third edition. Taylor Trade Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., David Sheets, H., & Fink, W. L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer. Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar