REFERENCES

• Barber, B. M.; Odean, T., and Zheng, L. 2005. Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows. The Journal of Business 78(6): 2095–2119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. J.; Goetzmann, W. N.; Ibbotson, R. G., and Ross, S. A. 1992. Survivor Bias in Performance Studies. The Review of Financial Studies 5(4): 553–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G. 1997. Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives. The Journal of Political Economy 105(6): 1167–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciriaco, A.; Del río, C., and Santamaría, R. 2003. ¿Tienen los inversores habilidades de selección? Resultados con fondos de inversión. Revista de Economía Aplicada 32(11): 51–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ciriaco, A., and Santamaría, R. 2005. Persistencia de resultados en los fondos de inversión españoles. Investigaciones Económicas 29(3): 525–573.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. 1954. Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ2 Tests. Biometrics 10(4): 417–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del guercio, D., and Tkac, P.A.. 2002. The Determinants of the Flow of Funds of Managed Portfolios: Mutual Funds vs. Pension Funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37(4): 523–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J., and Blake, C. R. 1996. The Persistence of Risk-Adjusted Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Business 69(2): 133–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferruz, L.; Andreu, L.; Sarto, J. L., and Vicente, L. 2007. Análisis de la persistencia en rentabilidad de los FIAMM y de los determinantes de sus comisiones. Revista Española De Financiación y Contabilidad 136: 689–706.
   Google Scholar
• Ferruz, L., and Vargas, M. 2005. Empirical Evidence of Performance Persistence in a Relatively Unexplored Market: The Case of Spanish Investment Funds. Applied Financial Economics Letters 1(2): 85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Goetzmann, W. N.; Greenwald, B., and Huberman, G. 1992. Market Response to Mutual Fund Performance. Columbia First Boston Series in Money, Economics, and Finance Working Paper FB-92–25. Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Grinblatt, M., and Titman, S. 1992. The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance 47(5): 1977–1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, M. J. 1996. Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds. The Journal of Finance 51(3): 783–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, DARRYLL, JAYENDU Patel, and Zeckhauser, Richard. 1993. Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short-Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974–1988. The Journal of Finance 48(1): 93–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, P. C., and Wu, J. S. 2000. Truth in Mutual Fund Advertising: Evidence on Future Performance and Fund Flows. The Journal of Finance 55(2): 937–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorana, A., and Servaes, H. 2004. Conflicts of Interest and Competition in the Mutual Fund Industry, working paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=240596
   Google Scholar
• Lakonishok, J. A.; Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. 1992. The structure and performance of the money management industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 339–391.
   Google Scholar
• Malkiel, B. G. 1995. Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991. The Journal of Finance 50(2): 549–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, C. P.; Matallín, J. C., and Fernández, M. 2008. Influencia de la rentabilidad en el proceso de selección en los planes de pensiones. Revista Española De Financiación y Contabilidad 138: 279–314.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. A. 2001. El puzzle de los fondos de inversión: un enfoque de demanda. Moneda y Crédito 213: 129–154.
   Google Scholar
• Menéndez, S., and Álvarez, S. 2000. La rentabilidad y persistencia de los resultados de los fondos de inversión españoles de renta variable. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 103: 15–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, V.; Wang, Z. J., and Zheng, L. 2004. Family Values and the Star Phenomenon: Strategies of Mutual Fund Families. The Review of Financial Studies 17(3): 667–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, J.; Zeckhauser, R., and Hendricks, D. 1991. The Rationality Struggle: Illustration from financial markets. The American Economic Review 81(2): 232–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirri, E. R., and Tufano, P. 1998. Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows. The Journal of Finance 53(5): 1589–1622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. V. 1978. Is Fund Growth Related to Fund Performance?. Journal of Portfolio Management 4(3): 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Spitz, A. E. 1970. Mutual fund performance and cash inflow. Applied Economics 2(2): 141–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo, I., and Marco, R. 2006. ¿Persisten las rentabilidades en el mercado de fondos de inversión español? Un análisis empírico para el período 1994–2001 (1). Estadística Española. 48(161): 5–38.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, B., and García, M. 2002. El mercado español de fondos de inversión de renta variable. Información Comercial Española 800: 193–207.
   Google Scholar