BIBLIOGRAFÍA

• Ahn, H. 2001. Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report. Long Range Planning 34(4): 441–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, S., y Otley, D. T. 1991. Strategy, structure, planning and control systems and performance evaluation-Rumenco Ltd. Management Accounting Research 2(3): 263–303.
   Google Scholar
• ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE CONTABILIDAD Y ADMINISTRACIÓN DE EMPRESAS (AECA). 2006. La contabilidad de gestión en el sistema portuario español. Serie de Contabilidad de Gestión. Documento 31. Madrid. AECA.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. A.; Waterhouse, J. H. y Wells, R. B. 1997. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review 38(3): 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ax, C., y Bjørnenak, T. 2005. Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations—the case of the balanced scorecard in Sweden. Management Accounting Research 16(1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D.; Chang, H., y Pizzini, M. J. 2004. The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy. The Accounting Review 79(1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D.; Potter, G., y Srinivasan, D. 2000. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. The Accounting Review 75(1): 65–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnenak, T., y Olson, O. 1999. Unbundling management accounting innovations. Management Accounting Research 10(4): 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrovitch, D. 1982. Decentralised planning and competition in a national multi-port system. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 16: 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bogt, H. J., y Helden, G. J. 2000. Accounting change in Dutch government: exploring the gap between expectations and realizations. Management Accounting Research 11(2): 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Braam, G. J. M., y Nijssen, E.J.. 2004. Performance effects of using the balanced scorecard: a note on the Dutch experience. Long Range Planning 37(4): 335–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., y Ballantine, J. 2004. Strategic enterprise management systems: new directions for research. Management Accounting Research 15(2): 225–240.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L.; Jones, D. A., y Widener, S. K. 2004. Managing value creation within the firm: an examination of multiple performance measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 16: 107–131.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J., y Scapens, R. 2000. Conceptualising management accounting change: an institutionalist framework. Management Accounting Research 11(1): 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., y Ittner, C. D. 2004. Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(3): 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. y Langfield-Smith, K. 1998. The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3): 243–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, W. J., y Thorkzadeh, G. 1998. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Information and Management 33(4): 171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar rodríguez, T. 2002. El cuadro de mando como herramienta para el control de gestión: el estudio de un caso. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 31(113): 905–940.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. K., e Hayuth, Y. 1994. Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs: centrality and intermediacy. Journal of Transport Geography 2(1): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Giner fillol, A.; Pontet ubal, N., y Ripoll feliu, V. M. 2007. Caso práctico: la contabilidad de gestión en el Plan Estratégico de la Autoridad Portuaria de Valencia. Harvard-Deusto Finanzas & Contabilidad 80: 68–80.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., y Malmi, T. 2002. Moderate impact of ERPS on management accounting: a lag or permanent outcome?, Management Accounting Research 13(3): 299–321.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., y Powell, A. 1985. Making sense of research into organizational and social aspects of management accounting: a review of its underlying assumptions. The Journal of Management Studies 22(5): 429–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque, Z. 2005. Linking environmental uncertainty to non-financial performance measures and performance: a research note. The British Accounting Review 37: 471–481.
   Google Scholar
• Hoque, Z., y James, W. 2000. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. Journal Management Accounting Research 12(1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., y Larcker, D. F. 1998. Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 205–238.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., y Larcker, D. F. 2001. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32(1–3): 349–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., y Larcker, D. F. 2002. Empirical management accounting research: are we just describing management consulting practice?. European Accounting Review 11(4): 787–794.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., y Norton, D. P. 1997. Cuadro de mando integral (The balanced scorecard). Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión 2000, S. A.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., y Norton, D. P. 2001. Como utilizar el cuadro de mando integral (The strategy-focused organization). Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión 2000, S. A.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R., y Smith, D. K. 1993. The wisdom of teams: creating the high performance organization. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krumwiede, K. 1998. The implementation stages of activity-based costing and the impact of contextual and organizational factors. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 239–277.
   Google Scholar
• Larrinaga gonzález, C. 1999. Perspectivas alternativas de investigación en contabilidad: una revisión. Revista de Contabilidad 2(3): 103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, A. M., y Mundy, J. 2005. Cross-sectional field studies in management accounting research-closing the gaps between surveys and case studies. Journal of Management Accounting Research 17: 119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lorca fernández, P., y De andrés suárez, J. 2007. Efectos de la implantación de los sistemas integrados de gestión (ERP) en las grandes empresas españolas. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 36(135): 595–624.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J., y Shields, M. 2003. Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28(2–3): 169–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R. L., y Cross, K. F. 1991. Measure up! Yardsticks for continuous improvement. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Malchow, M. B., y Kanafani, A. 2004. A Disaggregate Analysis of Port Selection. Transportation Research. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 40(4): 317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmi, T. 2001. Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: a research note. Management Accounting Research 12(2): 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Medina giacomozzi, A. 2005. Mapa estratégico del cuadro de mando integral: propuesta de indicadores de gestión a una empresa concreta. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 34(125): 307–331.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, F. 2000. Parenting styles and value creation: a management control approach. Management Accounting Research 11(1): 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, F., y Olve, N. G. 2001. Control systems in multibusiness companies: from performance management to strategic management. European Management Journal 19(4): 344–358.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, B.; Karlsson, M., y Sharma, E. 2000. Towards a theory of implementing the balanced scorecard: a study in association with the Swedish Telecommunication Firm Ericsson. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting 5(1): 59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T. 1999. Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research 10(4): 363–382.
   Google Scholar
• Prado lorenzo, J. M., e García sánchez, I. M. 2006. La utilización de la planificación estratégica y de los indicadores de gestión en el ámbito municipal: análisis empírico de los factores que afectan a su implantación. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 35(130): 645–672.
   Google Scholar
• Puertos DEL ESTADO. 2001. Proceso de planificaciÓn estratégica: la experiencia de Puertos del Estado III. Revista Puertos 86: 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll feliu, V. M.; Aparisi caudeli, J. A.; Giner fillol, A., y Maganto lópez, J. 2005. Caso práctico: la planificación estratégica y la implantación del cuadro de mando integral del sistema portuario español. Harvard-Deusto Finanzas y Contabilidad 63: 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 1990. Strategy and Accounting in a U.K. Conglomerate. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(1–2): 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B.; Scapens, R. W., y Theobald, M. 2004. Metodología de investigación en finanzas y contabilidad. Bilbao: Ediciones Deusto.
   Google Scholar
• Said, A. A.; Hassabelnaby, H. R., y Wier, B. 2003. An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of nonfinancial measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15: 193–223.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, R. 2001. Los puertos se han convertido en grandes centros logísticos de comercio y transporte. Revista del Ministerio de Fomento, 501: 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• Sharman, P., y Kavan, C. B. 1999. Software is not the solution: software selection's effect on implementing the balanced scorecard. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, february-march: 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 1997. Putting NFIs to work in a balanced scorecard environment. Management Accounting (uK) 75(3): 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Speckbacher, G.; Bischof, J., y Pfeiffer, T. 2003. A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in German-speaking countries. Management Accounting Research 14(4): 361–387.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1994. Case studies, en Denizen, N. K., y Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.): Handbook of qualitative research: 236–247. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• STRATEGY & FOCUS. 2007. Libro Blanco de la Dirección Estratégica en España 2007–2009. Madrid: Strategy & Focus.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, D. 2000. Issues involved in implementing a balanced business scorecard in an IT service organization. Total Quality Management, 11(4–5–6): S674-S679.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomela, T. S. 2005. The interplay of different levers of control: a case study of introducing a new performance measurement system. Management Accounting Research 16(3): 293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research. Design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar