BIBLIOGRAFÍA

• Alexander, D., y Archer, S. 2000. On the myth of ‘Anglo-Saxon’ Financial Accounting. The International Journal of Accounting 35(4): 539–557.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, D., y Archer, S. 2003. On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the «true and fair override». Accounting and Business Research 33(1): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, D., y Jermakowicz, E. 2006. A Trae and Fair View of the Principles/Rules Debate. Abacus 42(2): 132–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMERICAN ACCOUNTING ASSOCIATION FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD COMMITTEE. 2003. Evaluating Concepts-Based vs. Rules-based Approaches to Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons 17(1): 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Barlev, B., y Haddad, J. R. 2002. Fair Value Accounting and the management of the Firm. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14: 383–415.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. R., y Hayes, R. 2004. Reflecting form over substance: the case of Enron Corp. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15: 767–785.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(1): 3–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, V.; Goodacre, A., y Thompson, S. J. 2006. International lease-accounting reform and economic consequences: The views of U.K. users and preparers. The International Journal of Accounting 41(1): 75–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, B. C.; Bradbury, M., y Prangnell, H. 2006. Rules, Principles and Judgements in Accounting Standards. Abacus 42(2): 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J.; Bromwich, M., y Wagenhofer, A. 2006. Principles-Versus Rules-Based Accounting Standards: The FASB's Standard Setting Strategy. Abacus 42(2): 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, W. W. 2004. Rules, Principles, and the Accounting Crisis in the Usited States. European Business Organization Law Review 5: 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cañibano, L. 2006. El concepto de imagen fiel y su aplicación en España. Partida Doble 178: 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cañibano, L., y Mora, A. 2000. Características cualitativas de la información financiera, en Tua, J. (Ed.): El marco conceptual de la información financiera, 129–160. Madrid: AECA.
   Google Scholar
• Cea garcía, J. L., y Vidal lopo, R. 2008. Escenarios de excepción de prevalencia de la imagen fiel sobre los principios y normas contables legales. Análisis conceptual y evidencia empírica para las empresas españolas cotizadas en el IBEX 35. Revista de Contabilidad y Financiación CEF 308: 113–150.
   Google Scholar
• COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. 2008. Report From the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the operation of Regulation (EC) N.o 1.606/2002 of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. Disponible en http://ec.europa.eu/internalmarket/accounting/docs/ias/com-2008–0215en.pdf (consultado 8 de noviembre de 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Cordobés madueño, M., y Molina sánchez, H. 2000. Algunas reflexiones sobre la contabilidad creativa. Técnica Contable 52(614): 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, L. A. 2007. A Prescription to Retire the Rethoric of «Principles-Based Systems» in Corporate Law, Securities Regulation, and Accounting. Vanderbilt Law Review 60(5): 1409–1493.
   Google Scholar
• Chewning, E. G., y Higgs, J. L. 2000. A Meta-Analysis of Materiality Studies. Advances in Accounting 17: 65–90.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, F. 1996. Auditors' Knowledge Content and Judgement Performance: A Cognitive Script Approach. Accounting, Organizations & Society 21(4): 339–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY COUNCIL (FASAC). 2004. Revisiting the FASB's Conceptual Framework. Disponible en http://72.3.243.42/fasac/conceptualframework.pdf (consultado 8 de noviembre de 2009).
   Google Scholar
• FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARS BOARD (FASB). 1976. Accounting for Leases. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard n.° 13. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, F. 2003. Principles-Based Accounting Standards. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 28: 967–981.
   Google Scholar
• Holstrum, G. L., y Messier, W. F. jr. 1982. A Review and Integration of Empirical Research on Materiality, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 2(1): 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff, E. A., y Thomas, J. K. 1988. Economic consequences of accounting standards: The lease disclosure rule change. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10(4): 277–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INSTITUTO DE CONTABILIDAD Y AUDITORÍA DE CUENTAS (ICAC), 1999. Resolución de 14 de junio de 1999 del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas por la que se publica la Norma Técnica de Auditoría sobre el concepto de «importancia relativa». Boletín del ICAC, BOICAC 38(junio): 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• INSTITUTO DE CONTABILIDAD Y AUDITORÍA DE CUENTAS (ICAC) 2002. Informe sobre la situación actual de la contabilidad en España y líneas básicas para abordar su reforma. Madrid: ICAC.
   Google Scholar
• INSTITUTO DE CONTABILIDAD Y AUDITORÍA DE CUENTAS (ICAC) 2008. Consulta 1, aplicación de las NIIF-UE en transacciones cuyo tratamiento contable no está contemplado en las normas de contabilidad españolas. Boletín del ICAC, BOICAC 74 (junio): disponible en http://www.icac.meh.es/Temp/20091106101306.PDF (consultado 8 de noviembre de 2009).
   Google Scholar
• INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD (IASB). 2009. Normas Internacionales de Información Financiera. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• Karan, R. 2002. Irreconciliable Legal and Accounting Views of «A True and Fair View»: An Emerging Alternative from Australian Reforms. Journal of Law and Financial Management 1(1): 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kershaw, D. 2005. Evading Enron: Taking Principles Too Seriously In Accounting Regulation. The Modern Law Review 68(4): 594–625.
   Google Scholar
• Libby, R., y Frederick, D. M. 1990. Experience and the Aability to Explain Audit Findings. Journal of Accounting Research 28(2): 348–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livne, G., y Mcnichols, M. 2003. An Empirical Investigation of the Trae and Fair Override, Working paper.Disponibleenhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=380741&rec=1&srcabs=738304 (consultado 8 de noviembre de 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mcgee, A. 1991. The ‘True and Fair View’ Debate: A Study in the Legal Regulation of Accounting. The Modern Law Review 54(6): 874–888.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgregor, W. 1996. Accounting for leases: A new approach. Norwalk CT: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Molina sánchez, H. 1997. La planificación de la auditoría. Madrid: REA.
   Google Scholar
• Nailor, H., y Lennard, A. 2000. Leases: Implementation of a New Approach. Financial Accounting Series N.^o 206-A. Norwalk CT: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. W.; Elliot, J. A., y Tarpley, R. L. 2002. Evidence from Auditors about Managers' and Auditors' Earnings Management Decisions. The Accounting Review 77(4): 175–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. W. 2003. Behavioral Evidence on the Effects of Principles—and Rules-Based Standards, Accounting Horizons, 17(1): 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ordelheide, D. 1993. True and Fair View. A European and a German perspective. European Accounting Review 2(1): 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Penno, M. C. 2008. Rules and Accounting Vagueness in Conceptual Frameworks. Accounting Horizons 22(3): 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentfro, R., y Hooks, K. L. 2004. The Effect of Professional Judgement on Financial Reporting Comparability. Journal of Accounting and Financial Research 12(2): 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, K. 2003. Principles-Based Accounting Standards. Accounting Horizons 17(1): 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• SECURITY and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 2003. Study Pursuant to Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on the Adoption by the United States Financial Reporting System of a Principles-Based Accounting System. Disponible en http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/principlesbasedstand.htm (consultado 8 de noviembre de 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Tua pereda, J. 1982. El principio de imagen fiel. Aspectos jurídicos y contables. Revista Técnica del Instituto de Censores Jurados de Cuentas de España 5: 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tua pereda, J. 1983. Subprogramas de investigación en la emisión de principios contables. Técnica Contable 35(419): 361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Tua pereda, J. 1985. Algunas consideraciones adicionales en torno al principio de imagen fiel. Técnica Contable 37(444): 441–460.
   Google Scholar
• Tua pereda, J. 1990. El Plan General de Contabilidad y el Derecho Contable. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 65: 823–837.
   Google Scholar
• Tua pereda, J. 2006. Ante la reforma de nuestro ordenamiento contable: nuevas normas, nuevos conceptos: un ensayo. Revista de Contabilidad 9(18): 145–175.
   Google Scholar
• Van hulle, K. 1993. Truth and untruth about true and fair view: a commentary on «A European true and fair view» comment. European Accounting Review 2(1): 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Vera-Muñoz, S.; Kinney, W. R., y Bonner, S. E. 2001. The Effects of Domain Experience and Task Performance Presentation Format on Accountants' Information Relevance Assurance. The Accounting Review 76(3): 405–429.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. 1977. Corporate financial statements, a product of the market and political processes. Australian Journal of Management 2(1): 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. 2003. Conservatism in Accounting. Part I: Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons 17(3): 207–221.
   Google Scholar