Bibliografía

• Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Presley, T. J. (2012). Female board presence and the likelihood of financial restatement. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 607–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abersoch, D. (2011). The davies report women on boards. Reino Unido.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelberg, A. (1979). A methodology for measuring the understandability of financial report messages. Journal of Accounting Research, 17(2), 565–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts, W. (2005). Picking up the pieces. Impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 493–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts, W., & Cheng, P. (2011). Causal disclosures on earnings and earnings management in an IPO setting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30, 431–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts, W., & Tarca, A. (2010). Financial performance explanations and institutional setting. Accounting & Business Research, 40(5), 421–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Reeb, D. M., Upadhyay, A., & Zhao, W. (2011). Economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40, 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. (2012). Re-assessing the value of corporate reporting. ACCA.
   Google Scholar
• Babío, M. R., & Muiño, M. F. (2005). Corporate characteristics, governance rules and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Spain. Advances in Accounting, 21, 299–331.
   Google Scholar
• Baginski, S., Hassell, J., & Hillison, W. (2000). Voluntary causal disclosures. Tendencies and capital market reaction. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15, 371–389.
   Google Scholar
• Baginski, S., Hassell, J., & Kimbrogugh, M. (2004). Why do managers explain their earnings forecast? Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, O., Kile, C., & Venkataraman, K. (2001). The incremental price effects of sec mandated MD&A disclosures. Papel de trabajo. Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, J., & Mercer, M. (2005). To blame or not to blame. Analysts reactions to explanations of poor management performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(3), 509–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, A., Davidson, L. F., Rama, D., & Thiruvadi, S. (2010). CFO gender and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 24(1), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettman, J. R., & Weitz, B. A. (1983). Attributions in the board room. Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 165–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bini, L. (2013). Impression management and annual report narratives. The effects of internal and external control mechanisms in a non-Anglo-saxon context. Papel de trabajo.
   Google Scholar
• Botosan, C. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, julio, 323–349.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Caylor, D. (2004). Corporate governance and firm performance. European Financial Management, 2(10), 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. V., & Tucker, J. W. (2011). Large-sample evidence on firms’ year over year MD&A modifications. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(2), 309–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, S., & Schwenk, C. (1991). Self-serving attributions, managerial cognition, and company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 219–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. (2003). Financial reporting of good news and bad news. evidence from accounting narratives. Accounting & Business Research, 33(3), 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, C., & Jones. (2005). Management discussion and analysis. A review and implications for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 24, 135–174.
   Google Scholar
• Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores. (2013). Guía para la elaboración del informe de gestión de las entidades cotizadas. CNMV.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, D., & Dalton, C. (2010). Women and corporate boards of directors. The promise of increased, and substantive, participation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Business Horizons, 53, 257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 325–345.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2014). Gender differences in financial reporting decision making. Evidence from accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(20), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fresard, L. (2010). Financial strength and product market behaviour. The real effects of corporate cash holdings. The Journal of Finance, 65(3), 1097–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Osma, B., & Guillamon-Saorin, E. (2011). Corporate governance and impression management in annual results press releases. Accounting, Organization and Society Journal, 36(4–5), 187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girdharry, K., Simonova, E., & Lefebvre, R. (2011). MD&A- Counterpart to or distraction from financial reporting. Ottawa: Certified General Accountants Association of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Código Unificado de Buen Gobierno. (2006). Informe del grupo especial de trabajo sobre buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 314–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heatherington, L., Burns, A. B., & Gustafson, T. B. (1998). When another stumbles. Gender and self-presentation to vulnerable others. Sex Roles, 38, 889–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra, R. (2001). Cultural differences in self-serving behaviour in accounting narrative. APIRA Conference. Adelaida: University of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra, R. (2003). The Construction of Reality. Cultural Differences in Self-Serving Behaviour in Accounting Narratives ( Tesis doctoral). Rotterdam. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra, R. (2010). Letters to the shareholders. A content analysis comparison of letters written by CEOs in the United States and Japan. International Journal of Accounting, 45(3), 275–300.
   Google Scholar
• Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender-related boardroom dynamics. How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2), 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas. (2002). Informe sobre la situación actual de la contabilidad en España y líneas básicas para abordar sus reformas. Ministerio de Economía (Libro Blanco para la reforma de la contabilidad en España). Madrid: ICAC.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, H. W. (1976). Theory of the firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keusch, T., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2012). Self-serving bias in annual report narratives. An empirical analysis of the impact of economic crises. European Accounting Review, 2(3), 623–648.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbrough, M. D., & Wang, I. Y. (2014). Are seemingly self-serving attributions in earnings press releases plausible? Empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 635–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbrough, M. D., & Yayan Wang, I. (2009). Evidence on investors’ assessment of the plausibility of seemingly self-serving attributions of earnings performance. Papel de trabajo.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. V., & Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line. An exploration of gender and earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labelle, R., Cargouri, R. M., & Francoeur, C. (2010). Ethics, diversity management and financial reporting quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 335–353.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F., Peterson, C., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2004). Mea culpa. Predicting stock prices from organizational attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1636–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., Quigley, B. M., Nesler, M. S., Corbett, A. B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Development of a self-presentation tactics scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 701–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley Orgánica 3/2007, de 22 de marzo, para la igualdad efectiva de mujeres y hombres.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3), 221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board Independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, P., & Phillips, G. M. (2005). How does industry affect firm financial structure? Review of Financial Studies, 18, 1433–1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod Heminway, J. (2007). Sex, trust, and corporate boards. Hastings Women’s Law Journal, 18, 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, M. (2004). How do investors assess the credibility of management disclosures? Accounting Horizons, 18(3), 185–196.
   Google Scholar
• Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality. Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Female executives and earnings management. Managerial Finance, 36(7), 629–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PriceWaterhouse Coopers. (2007). Corporate reporting. A time for reflection. A survey of the fortune global 500 companies’ reporting. New York, NY: PWC.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, B. A. (2005). Genre analysis of corporate annual report narratives. Journal of Business Communication, 42(4), 349–378.
   Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., & Meindl, J. R. (1984). Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(2), 238–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk, C. (1990). Illusions of management control? Effects of serf-serving atributions on resource commitments and confidence in management. Human Relations, 43, 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, B., Gul, F., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B., McKechnie, P., & Puffer, S. (1983). The justification of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 582–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, O. (2012). La neutralidad de la información narrativa. un estudio del informe de gestión de las empresas españolas ( Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
   Google Scholar
• Thadeu, A., & Sanches, M. (2009). An investigation of the relationship between self-serving attributions and corporate governance. Papel de tabajo. Fucape Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, E. W. K. (2002). Self-serving attributions in corporate annual reports. A replicated study. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, A., & Zeng, H. (2014). Gender and ethic diversity on boards and corporate information environment. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2456–2463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & Dadalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance. The roles of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 295–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, L. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems, 35, 64–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar