References

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (1993). In the Public Interest: A Special Report by the Public Oversights Board of the SEC Practice Section. New York, NY: AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Asare, S. K., Hackenbrack, K., & Knechel, W. R. (1994). Client acceptance and continuation decisions. In R. P. Srivastava & K. S. Lawrence (Eds.) Proceedings of the 1994 Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems (pp. 163–178). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audousset-Coulier, S., Jeny, A., & Jiang, L. (2016). The validity of auditor industry specialization measures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(1), 139–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., & Brandt, R. (1999). Perceptions of auditor independence: UK evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 8(2), 67–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T. B., Causholli, M., & Knechel, W. R. (2015). Audit firm tenure, non-audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 461–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, N. R., Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. (2018). Auditor size and going concern reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blay, A. D., & Geiger, M. A. (2013). Auditor fees and auditor independence: Evidence from going concern reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 579–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson, J., & Breesch, D. (2004). Referral as a determining factor for changing auditors in the belgian auditing market: An empirical study. International Journal of Accounting, 39(3), 307–328.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M., Leone, A., & Willenborg, M. (2004). An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37, 139–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Vanstraelen, A., & Willenborg, M. (2009). Rules rather than discretion in audit standards: Going-concern opinions in Belgium. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1395–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P., Kortum, S., & Moroney, R. (2012). Auditors’ going‐concern‐modified opinions after 2001: Measuring reporting accuracy. Accounting & Finance, 52(4), 1041–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P. J., Geiger, M. A., & O’Connell, B. T. (2008). Costs associated with going-concern-modified audit opinions: An analysis of the Australian audit market. Abacus, 44(1), 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. K., Jeter, D. C., & Shivakumar, L. (2004). Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Peng, S., Xue, S., Yang, Z., & Ye, F. (2016). Do audit clients successfully engage in opinion shopping? Partner-level evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 79–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Sun, S. Y. J., & Wu, D. (2010). Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 127–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, H.-Y., & Chi, C.-L. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 201–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, W., Douthett, E. B., Jr., & Lei, L. L. (2012). Client importance and audit partner independence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 320–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C.-L., & Chi, H.-Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, B. K., Jenkins, J. G., McCracken, S. A., Roush, P. B., & Stanley, J. D. (2015). Auditor independence in fact: Research, regulatory, and practice implications drawn from experimental and archival research. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 217–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianci, A. M., & Bierstaker, J. L. (2009). The effect of performance feedback and client importance on auditors’ self- and public-focused ethical judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(5), 455–474.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. T., Stokes, D., & Laughton, J. (2002). Auditor independence and fee dependence? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 253–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981a). Auditor Independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127.
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981b). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit research after sarbanes-oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(Supplement), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do nonaudit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going-concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Zhang. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2–3), 275–326.
   Google Scholar
• DeZoort, F. T., & Lord, A. T. (1994). An investigation of obedience pressure effects on auditors’ judgments. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 6(Supplement), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2005). The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 113–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, R., Johnson, M., & Nelson, K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings quality. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement), 77–104.
   Google Scholar
• Gaeremynck, A., Van der Meulen, S., & Willekens, M. (2008). Audit-firm portfolio characteristics and client financial statement quality. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 243–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeremynck, A., & Willekens, M. (2003). The endogenous relationship between audit-report type and business termination: Evidence on private firms in a non-litigious environment. Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Riccardi, W. (2014). The global financial crisis: U.S. bankruptcies and going-concern audit opinions. Accounting Horizons, 28(1), 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Rama, D. V. (2003). Audit fees, non-audit fees, and auditor reporting on stressed companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Rama, D. V. (2006). Audit firm size and going-concern reporting accuracy. Accounting Horizons, 20(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gippel, J., Smith, T., & Zhu, Y. (2015). Endogeneity in accounting and finance research: Natural experiments as a state-of-the-art solution. Abacus, 51(2), 143–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., & Wu, D. (2014). Is the effect of industry expertise on audit pricing an office-level or a partner-level phenomenon? Review of Accounting Studies, 19(4), 1532–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. W. (1996). Auditors’ incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 71(1), 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2016). Do (Fe)male auditors impair audit quality? Evidence from going-concern opinions. European Accounting Review, 25(1), 7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardies, K., Vandenhaute, M.-L., & Breesch, D. (2018). An analysis of auditors’ going-concern reporting accuracy in private firms. Accounting Horizons, 32(4), 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O.-K., & Langli, J. C. (2010). Auditor independence in a private-firm and low litigation risk setting. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 573–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, W., McKeown, J., & Mutchler, J. (1994). A reexamination of auditor versus model accuracy within the context of the going-concern opinion decision. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(2), 409–431.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, S., Chapple, L., & Monroe, G. S. (2018). Does auditor gender affect issuing going-concern decisions for financially distressed clients? Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1027–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibáñez, P. C., & Pechuán, A. M. (2011). Nonaudit services provided by incumbent auditors and earnings management: Evidence of auditor independence from an EU country. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 40(152), 587–612.
   Google Scholar
• Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 205–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonnergård, K., Stafsudd, A., & Elg, U. (2010). Performance evaluations as gender barriers in professional organizations: A study of auditing firms. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(6), 721–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Niemi, L., & Zerni, M. (2013). Empirical evidence on the implicit determinants of compensation in big 4 audit partnerships. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(2), 349–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2007). The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the identity of engagement partners matter? An analysis of audit partner reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1443–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J. (1997). Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review, 72(4), 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langli, J. C., & Svanström, T. (2014). Audits of private companies. In D. Hay, W. R. Knechel, & M. Willekens (Eds.), Routledge companion to auditing (pp. 148–158). New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. (2000). Do companies successfully engage in opinion shopping: Evidence from the UK? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C., & Wu, X. (2018). A review of the archival literature on audit partners. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. (2009). Does client importance affect auditor independence at the office level? Empirical evidence from going-concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 201–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C.-Y., & Tan, H.-T. (2008). Non-audit service fees and audit quality: The impact of auditor specialization. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 199–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, R. P., & Tseng, M. C. (1990). Audit pricing and independence. The Accounting Review, 65(2), 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (1992). Do we need to consider the individual auditor when discussing auditor independence? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(2), 74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., & McKeown, J. C. (1997). The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Elliott, J., & Tarpley, R. (2002). Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement), 175–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooghe, H., & Spaenjers, C. (2005). De FiTO-meter: Een nieuwe, eenvoudige en geïntegreerde maatstaf voor de financiële toestand van een onderneming. Accountancy & Bedrijfskunde, 25(3), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Company Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2009,July 28). Concept release on requiring the engagement partner to sign the audit report (PCAOB Release No. 2009-005).
   Google Scholar
• Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K. J., & Francis, J. R. (2000). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., De Fuentes-Barberá, C., & García-Benau, M. A. (2004). Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 13(4), 597–620.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, D. S. (2014). Non-audit Services and Auditor Independence. In D. Hay, W. R. Knechel, & M. Willekens (Eds.), Routledge companion to auditing (pp. 67–88). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, S. Z. (2000). Auditor resignations: Clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(2), 173–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. (2003, January 15). Audit quality and audit firm size: Revisited. Working paper presented at the 2004 Midyear Auditing Section Doctoral Consortium, Clearwater Beach.
   Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2014). Auditor-in-charge characteristics and going-concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 531–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanström, T. (2013). Non-audit services and audit quality: Evidence from private firms. European Accounting Review, 22(2), 337–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trompeter, G. (1994). The effect of partner compensation schemes and generally accepted accounting principles on audit partner judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13(2), 56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenhaute, M.-L., Hardies, K., & Breesch, D. (2019). Professional and commercial incentives in audit firms: Evidence on partner compensation. European Accounting Review, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1642223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Bauwhede, H., & Willekens, M. (2004). Evidence on (the lack of) audit-quality differentiation in the private client segment of the Belgian audit market. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 501–522.
   Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A., & Schelleman, C. (2017). Auditing private companies: What do we know? Accounting and Business Research, 47(5), 565–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallman, S. M. H. (1996). The future of accounting, part III: Reliability and auditor independence. Accounting Horizons, 10(4), 76–97.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1981). The markets for independence and independent auditors (Working paper). University of Rochester.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J., Willenborg, M., & Zhang, J. (2008). Does auditor reputation matter? The case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 941–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Carson, E., Fargher, N., & Jiang, L. (2013). Responses by Australian auditors to the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, 53(1), 301–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, P., Carson, E., & Simnett, R. (2011). Threats to auditor independence: The impact of relationship and economic bond. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(1), 121–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerni, M. (2012). Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 312–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar