References / Referencias
- Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Bazerman, C. (2007). Writing and cognitive development: Beyond writing to learn. In A. Bonini, D. de Carvalho Figueiredo, & F. J. Rauen. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International symposium on genre studies (pp. 38–49). Tubarão, Santa Catarina, Brazil: University of Southern Santa Catarina.
- Coe, R., Lingard, L., & Teslenko, T. (Eds.). (2002). The rhetoric and ideology of genre. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Council of Graduate Schools. (2016). Imagining the dissertation’s many futures. GradEdge, 5(1), 3. Retrieved from http://cgsnet.org/sites/default/files/March%20FINAL2.pdf
- Dalgleish, M., & Powell, D. Eds. (2015). Beyond the dissertation as a proto-monograph: Process and experimentation. Media Commons. Retrieved from http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/alt-ac/cluster/beyond-dissertation-2
- Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds.) (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
- Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Institute for the Public Life of Arts and Ideas. (2013). White paper on the future of the PhD in the humanities. Montréal: McGill University. Retrieved from http://iplai.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/white_paper_on_the_future_of_the_phd_in_the_humanities_dec_2013_1.pdf
- Krook, A. (2015). From being to doing: Mobilizing the humanities. Paper presented at The Future of Graduate Education in the Humanities, Institute for the Public Life of Arts and Ideas (IPLAI). Montréal: McGill University. Retrieved from: http://annekrook.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/McGill-talk-May-2015.pdf
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Maxwell, T. W., & Kupczyk‐Romanczuk, G. (2009). Producing the professional doctorate: The portfolio as a legitimate alternative to the dissertation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 135–145. doi:10.1080/14703290902843760
- Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
- Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine, & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 59–74). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Paré, A., & LeMaistre, C. (2006). Distributed mentoring in communities of practice. In P. Tynjälä, J. Välimaa, & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Higher education and working life: Collaborations, confrontations and challenges (pp. 129–141). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., & McAlpine, L. (2009). The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 179–193). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/
- Patton, S. (2013, February 11). The dissertation can no longer be defended. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Dissertation-Can-No-Longer/137215/
- Smith, S. (2015). Manifesto for the humanities: Transforming doctoral education in good enough times. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?cc=dcbooks;c=dcbooks;idno=13607059.0001.001;rgn=full%20text;view=toc;xc=1;g=dculture