Does grammatical aspect influence event conceptualization? The description of translational events in a second language / ¿Influye el aspecto gramatical en la conceptualización del evento? La descripción de eventos de translación en la segunda lengua

References / Referencias

• Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross‐linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37, 286–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, B. K., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylund, E., & Jarvis, S. (2011). L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, M., Stutterheim, C. V., & Nüse, R. (2004). The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In C. Habel, & T. Pechmann (Eds.), Approaches to language production (pp. 18–218). Berlin: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, B. (1981). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Departament d’Educació (2002). Prova de llengua. Aules d’acollida secundària. Barcelona: Xarxa Telemàtica Educativa de Catalunya, Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved from: http://xtec.gencat.cat/ca/projectes/alumnat-origen-estranger/alumnatnou/avaluacio/acollida/secorientacions/completes/
   Google Scholar
• Driagina, V. V. (2007). Crossing and bridging spaces in a second language: A corpus-based investigation of motion talk by american learners of Russian. The Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/6441
   Google Scholar
• Filipović, L. (2007). Talking about motion. A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., Athanasopoulos, P., Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G. (2015). On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition, 141, 41–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., Carroll, M., Weimar, K., & Stutterheim, C. V. (2015). Driving along the road or heading for the village? Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French-German L2 users. Modern Language Journal, 99, 100–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecken, M., Stutterheim, C. V., & Carroll, M. (2014). Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: Findings from a cross- linguistic non-verbal recognition task. Language and Cognition, 6, 45–78.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, J. (1970). A grammar of aspect. Usage and meaning in the Russian verb. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasko, V. (2010). The role of thinking for speaking in adult L2 speech: The case of (non)uniderectionality encoding by American learners of Russian. In Z. Han, & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking (pp. 34–58). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. H., & Spivey, M. (2014). Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004). Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 317–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda, L. A. (2003). Aspect at your fingertips: Why what you know about matter matters, or a user-friendly conceptualization of verbal aspect in Russian. The Slavic and East European Journal, 47, 251–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Cross-linguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions title. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 77–107). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31, 663–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock, T. (2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2, 243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York, NY: Dial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parrill, F., Bergen, B. K., & Lichtenstein, P. V. (2013). Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 135–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A. (2010). Verbs of motion in L1 Russian of Russian–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Saldanya, M. (2002). Les relacions aspectuals i temporals. In J. Solà, M. R. Lloret, J. Mascaró, & M. Pérez-Saldanya (Eds.), Gramàtica del Català contemporani (pp. 2567–2661). Barcelona: Empúries.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedtová, B. (2011). Do L2 speakers think in the L1 when speaking in the L2? Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 139–179. Retrieved from http://vialjournal.webs.uvigo.es/abstract_8_6.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedtová, B., Stutterheim, C. V., & Carroll, M. (2011). Language specific patterns in event construal in advanced second language speakers. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 66–106). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 435–445. doi:10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1993). Adult language acquisition: A view from child langugage study. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 239–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stutterheim, C. V., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B. (2012). How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50, 833–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutterheim, C. V., & Carroll, M. (2006). The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. A. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities. Educating for advanced foreign language capacities. Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assesment (pp. 40–53). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. doi:10.1080/17501220802496572
   Google Scholar
• Stutterheim, C. V., & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 5, 851–881.
   Google Scholar
• Stutterheim, C. V., Nüse, R., & Murcia-Serra, J. (2002). Cross-linguistic differences in the conceptualisation of events. Language and Computers, 39, 179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake, A. (2004). A reference grammar of Russian. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D. P. (2004). The verbalization of motion events in Arrernte. Relating events in narrative: Typologiocal and contextual perspectives. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 143–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar