456
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers (Artículos)

The development of source evaluation skills during adolescence: exploring different levels of source processing and their relationships (El desarrollo de las habilidades de evaluación de las fuentes durante la adolescencia: una exploración de los distintos niveles de procesamiento de las fuentes y sus relaciones)

, , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 19-59 | Received 12 Oct 2018, Accepted 06 Nov 2019, Published online: 06 Dec 2019

References / Referencias

  • Aguiar, N. R., Stoess, C. J., & Taylor, M. (2012). The development of children’s ability to fill the gaps in their knowledge by consulting experts. Child Development, 83, 1368–1381.
  • Aillerie, K. (2011). Pratiques informationnelles informelles des adolescents (14-18 ans) sur le Web (Doctoral dissertation). Université Paris-Nord-Paris XIII.
  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
  • Anderson, M. J. (2005). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, 26, 32–46.
  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
  • Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103.
  • Barzilai, S., Tzadok, E., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts: Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation. Instructional Science, 43, 737–766.
  • Boubée, N., & Tricot, A. (2010). Qu’est-ce que rechercher de l’information? État de l’art. Villeurbanne: Presses de l’Enssib.
  • Braasch, J. L., Rouet, J. F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40, 450–465.
  • Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing skills. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 773–799.
  • Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., Brandmo, C., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30, 9–24.
  • Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013). Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: The roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation. Reading and Writing, 26, 321–348.
  • Bråten, I., Stadtler, M., & Salmerón, L. (2017). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In The Routledge Handbook of discourse processes (p. 141). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: Examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38, 635–657.
  • Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485–522.
  • Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J. R. Kirby, & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276–314). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., Eagly, A.H. (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Cho, C. H., Martens, M. L., Kim, H., & Rodrigue, M. (2011). Astroturfing global warming: It isn’t always greener on the other side of the fence. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 571–587.
  • Clark, C. (2013). Children’s and young people’s reading in 2012: Findings from the 2012 national literacy trust’s annual survey. London: National Literacy Trust.
  • CLEMI. (2014). Médias & information, on apprend ! Edition 2014-2015. Chasseneuil-du-Poitou [Media and Information, one learns!]: Canopé. Retrieved from http://www.clemi.org/fichier/plug_download/54153/download_fichier_fr_medias_et_information2014_15.pdf
  • Eastin, M. S., Rieh, S. Y., Hilligoss, D. S. B., Sundar, S. S., Lankes, R. D., Eysenbach, M. M. G., & Weingarten, F. W. (2008). Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Eastin, M. S., Yang, M. S., & Nathanson, A. I. (2006). Children of the net: An empirical exploration into the evaluation of Internet content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 211–230.
  • Eurostat. (2015). Internet use and activities. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do
  • Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., & Hartsell, E. (2010). Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., & Werner, B. (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21, 220–231.
  • Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. J. Koehler, & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 62–88). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
  • Haddon, L., Livingstone, S., & the EU Kids Online network. (2012). EU kids online national perspectives. EU Kids Online. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46878/
  • Hahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Kröhne, U., & Naumann, J. (2018). The role of reading skills in the evaluation of online information gathered from search engine environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 223–234.
  • Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450, 557.
  • Heyman, G. D., Sweet, M. A., & Lee, K. (2009). Children’s reasoning about lie‐telling and truth‐telling in politeness contexts. Social Development, 18, 728–746.
  • Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners’ science content understandings with the use of on‐line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40, 323–346.
  • Kammerer, Y., Kalbfell, E., & Gerjets, P. (2016). Is this information source commercially biased? How contradictions between web pages stimulate the consideration of source information. Discourse Processes, 53, 430–456.
  • Keil, F. C., Stein, C., Webb, L., Billings, V. D., & Rozenblit, L. (2008). Discerning the division of cognitive labor: An emerging understanding of how knowledge is clustered in other minds. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 259–300.
  • Kiili, C., Laurinen, L., & Marttunen, M. (2008). Students evaluating Internet sources: From versatile evaluators to uncritical readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39, 75–95.
  • Kobayashi, K. (2014). Students’ consideration of source information during the reading of multiple texts and its effect on intertextual conflict resolution. Instructional Science, 42, 183–205.
  • Koenig, M. A., & Jaswal, V. K. (2011). Characterizing children’s expectations about expertise and incompetence: Halo or pitchfork effects? Child Development, 82, 1634–1647.
  • Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309–328.
  • Landrum, A. R., Mills, C. M., & Johnston, A. M. (2013). When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children’s trust more than expertise. Developmental Science, 16, 622–638.
  • Lefavrais, P. (1968). La Pipe et le Rat. L’évaluation du savoir-lire du cours préparatoire à l’enseignement supérieur et le facteur d’éducabilité PI [The Pipe and the Rat. The evaluation of reading proficiency from 1st grade to university and the educability factor PI]. Issy-Les-Moulineaux: Edition et Application Psychologique.
  • Locker, L., Hoffman, L., & Bovaird, J. A. (2007). On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 723–730.
  • Lucassen, T., Muilwijk, R., Noordzij, M. L., & Schraagen, J. M. (2013). Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 254–264.
  • Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 1073–1084.
  • Macedo-Rouet, M., Braasch, J. L., Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2013). Teaching fourth and fifth graders to evaluate information sources during text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 204–226.
  • Macedo-Rouet, M., Potocki, A., Scharrer, L., Ros, C., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2019). How good is this page? Benefits and limits of prompting on teenagers’ assessment of Web information quality. Reading Research Quarterly, 54, 299–321.
  • Mascaro, O., & Sperber, D. (2009). The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition, 112, 367–380.
  • Mills, C. M. (2013). Knowing when to doubt: Developing a critical stance when learning from others. Developmental Psychology, 49, 404.
  • Paul, J., Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. F., & Stadtler, M. (2017). Why attend to source information when reading online? The perspective of ninth grade students from two different countries. Computers & Education, 113, 339–354.
  • Pérez, A., Potocki, A., Stadtler, M., Macedo-Rouet, M., Paul, J., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Fostering teenagers’ assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions. Learning and Instruction, 58, 53–64.
  • Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Potocki, A., Magnan, A., & Ecalle, J. (2015). Computerized trainings in four groups of struggling readers: Specific effects on word reading and comprehension. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 83–92.
  • Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52, 337–355.
  • Richter, T., Schroeder, S., & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538.
  • Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145–161.
  • Rouet, J. F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85–106.
  • Rouet, J. F., Le Bigot, L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing, 29, 1549–1570.
  • Rouet, J. F., & Potocki, A. (2018). From reading comprehension to document literacy: Learning to search for, evaluate and integrate information across texts. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 41, 415–446.
  • Salmerón, L., Macedo‐Rouet, M., & Rouet, J. F. (2016). Multiple viewpoints increase students’ attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2404–2419.
  • Scharrer, L., & Salmerón, L. (2016). Sourcing in the reading process: Introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing, 29, 1539–1548.
  • Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361–366.
  • Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25, 359–393.
  • Stadtler, M., Babiel, S., Rouet, J.-F., & Bromme, R. (2014, April). Ninth-grade students possess good sourcing skills, but do not apply them spontaneously while reading. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–Source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp, & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stanford History Education Group, 2016.
  • Stanford History Education Group. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Retrieved from https://sheg.stanford.edu/upload/V3LessonPlans/Executive%20Summary%2011.21.16.pdf
  • Statistics Norway. (2013). Norwegian media barometer 2012. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/kultur-og-fritid/artikler-og-publikasjoner/_attachment/116447?_ts=13ef9a29570
  • Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20, 192–204.
  • Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 176–203.
  • Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18, 513–527.
  • Vanderbilt, K. E., Liu, D., & Heyman, G. D. (2011). The development of distrust. Child Development, 82, 1372–1380.
  • VanderBorght, M., & Jaswal, V. K. (2009). Who knows best? Preschoolers sometimes prefer child informants over adult informants. Infant and Child Development: an International Journal of Research and Practice, 18, 61–71.
  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., DeSetto, L., & Pruzek, R. M. (1981). Developmental trends in the salience of meaning versus structural attributes of written words. Psychological Research, 43, 131–153.
  • Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology: the Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22, 407–423.
  • Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 8–25.
  • Viavoice. (2012). Les pratiques des 9-16 ans sur Internet [9- to 16-year-olds’ practices on the Internet]. Institut Viavoice. Retrieved from http://www.institut-viavoice.com/docs/Les-pratiques-des-9-16-ans-sur-internet_Decembre2012.pdf
  • Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52, 234–246.
  • Wheeler, B. (2010). Permutation tests for linear models. Retrieved from http://www.bobwheeler.com/stat
  • Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106.
  • Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73.
  • Wirth, W., Böcking, T., Karnowski, V., & Von Pape, T. (2007). Heuristic and systematic use of search engines. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 778–800.
  • Xu, F., Evans, A. D., Li, C., Li, Q., Heyman, G., & Lee, K. (2013). The role of honesty and benevolence in children’s judgments of trustworthiness. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 257–265.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.