Are frequent users of social network sites good information evaluators? An investigation of adolescents’ sourcing abilities (¿Son los usuarios frecuentes de las redes sociales evaluadores competentes? Un estudio de las habilidades de los adolescentes para identificar, evaluar y hacer uso de las fuentes)

References / Referencias

• Aillerie, K., & McNicol, S. (2016). Are social networking sites information sources? Informational purposes of high-school students in using SNSs. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50, 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018, June). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A. F. (2013). TIC kids online Brasil 2012 - Pesquisa sobre o uso da Internet por crianças e adolescentes no Brasil. Comitê gestor da Internet no Brasil. Retrieved from http://cetic.br/media/docs/publicacoes/2/tic-kids-online-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, V., Bishop, D. V., & Przybylski, A. K. (2015). The debate over digital technology and young people. BMJ: British Medical Journal ( Online), 351, h3064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 180–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L., Rouet, J. F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40, 450–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2017). The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52, 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Stadtler, M., & Salmerón, L. (2018). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In M. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & M. A. Britt (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 141–166). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Durik, A. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Stadtler, M., & Scharrer, L. (2018). The provenance of certainty: Multiple source use and the public engagement with science. In J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 269–284). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Preotiuc-Pietro, D., Clark, J., Flekova, L., Smith, L., Kern, M. L., … Seligman, M. (2018). The impact of actively open-minded thinking on social media communication. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Coscarelli, C., Maykel, C., & Forzani, E. (2015). Investigating criteria that seventh graders use to evaluate the quality of online information. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59, 287–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deltour, J. J. (1998). Echelle de vocabulaire Mill-Hill de J.-C. Raven, adaptation française. Paris: EAP.
   Google Scholar
• Dienlin, T., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2017). Reinforcement or displacement? The reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS communication and their effects on loneliness and life satisfaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehmke, T., & Siegle, T. (2005). ISEI, ISCED, HOMEPOS, ESCS - Indicators of social background for quantifying social disparity. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 521–539.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E. (2009). Partial confirmatory factor analysis: Described and illustrated on the NEO–PI–R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 40–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Gibbins, T., & Menzer, M. M. (2015). Re-thinking scientific literacy out-of-school: Arguing science issues in a niche Facebook application. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 593–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. L. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 515–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2018). Social network site use and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 119, 76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifinedo, P. (2016). Applying uses and gratifications theory and social influence processes to understand students’ pervasive adoption of social networking sites: Perspectives from the Americas. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 192–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 275–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, D., Kammerer, Y., & Starauschek, E. (2015). Reading science texts online: Does source information influence the identification of contradictions within texts? Computers & Education, 82, 442–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. H., & Wu, J. Y. (2013). The indirect effects of online social entertainment and information seeking activities on reading literacy. Computers & Education, 67, 168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefavrais, P. (1986). La pipe et le rat [Pipe and rat]. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Etablissements d’Applications Psychotechniques.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Ólafsson, K., & Haddon, L. (2014). Children’s online risks and opportunities: Comparative findings from EU kids online and net children go mobile. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60513/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_EU%20Kids%20Online_EU%20Kids%20Online-Children’s%20online%20risks_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marker, C., Gnambs, T., & Appel, M. (2018). Active on Facebook and failing at school? Meta-analytic findings on the relationship between online social networking activities and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 651–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkt, M., Werner, M., & Wagner, W. (2017). Historical thinking skills and mastery of multiple document tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2008). Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., Roberts, D. F., & Vuuren, D. V. (1993). Reconsidering the displacement hypothesis: Television’s influence on children’s time use. Communication Research, 20, 51–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, European Union, & UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2015). ISCED 2011 operational manual: Guidelines for classifying national education programmes and related qualifications. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264228368-en
   Google Scholar
• Pasek, J., More, E., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Facebook and academic performance: Reconciling a media sensation with data. First Monday, 14(5). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.dk/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2498/2181
   Google Scholar
• Paul, J., Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. F., & Stadtler, M. (2017). Why attend to source information when reading online? The perspective of ninth grade students from two different countries. Computers & Education, 113, 339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, A., Potocki, A., Stadtler, M., Macedo-Rouet, M., Paul, J., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Fostering teenagers’ assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions. Learning and Instruction, 58, 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Towards a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Porsch, T., & Bromme, R. (2011). Effects of epistemological sensitization on source choices. Instructional Science, 39, 805–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhl, T., Tsovaltzi, D., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 605–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1965). The Mill Hill vocabulary scale. London: H. K. Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 19–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2014). Learning from multiple documents. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 813–841). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säälik, Ü. (2015). Reading performance, learning strategies, gender and school language as related issues–PISA 2009 findings in Finland and Estonia. International Journal of Teaching & Education, 3, 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., García, A., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2018). The development of adolescents’ comprehension-based Internet reading skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Rouet, J.-F. (2016). Multiple viewpoints increase students’ attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2404–2419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A., Zimmer, K., Evans, J., & Clements, N. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing (NJ1). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–Source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp, & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. F., & Bromme, R. (2016). Improving vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science controversies. Reading and Writing, 29, 705–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2002). Norwegian students’ use of multiple sources while reading expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 208–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)–A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsitsika, A. K., Tzavela, E. C., Janikian, M., Ólafsson, K., Iordache, A., Schoenmakers, T. M., … Richardson, C. (2014). Online social networking in adolescence: Patterns of use in six European countries and links with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 141–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneau, F. (2007). Trois mesures du vocabulaire chez des élèves d’écoles françaises du Nouveau-Brunswick. Revue de l’Université de Moncton, 38, 181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2005). WISC-IV: Echelle d’Intelligence de Wechsler pour Enfants (4ème Edition) [WISC-IV: Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.)]. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3048994
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, B., Hardin, M., & Sun, T. (2011). Less effortful thinking leads to more social networking? The associations between the use of social network sites and personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1265–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar