Relations between literacy-related abilities and the lexical quality of expository texts of Hebrew-speaking children (Relaciones entre habilidades relacionadas con el aprendizaje de la lengua escrita y la calidad léxica de los textos expositivos de niños hebreo-parlantes)

References / Referencias

• Albuquerque, C. P. (2017). Rapid naming: The importance of different reading and spelling dimensions. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 35(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.3715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, C., Armon-Lotem, S., Fichman, S., & Walters, J. (2016). Macrostructure, microstructure, and mental state terms in the narratives of English–Hebrew bilingual preschool children with and without specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avivi Ben- Zvi, G. (2010). Morpho-lexical development across the school years [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Berman, R., Nayditz, R., & Ravid, D. (2011). Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations. Written Language & Literacy, 14(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.01ber
   Google Scholar
• Berman, R. A. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35(4), 735–771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908008787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 79–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandão, A. C. P., & Oakhill, J. (2005). “How do you know this answer?” Children’s use of text data and general knowledge in story comprehension. Reading & Writing, 18(7), 687–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5600-x
   Google Scholar
• Caravolas, M., & Samara, A. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In A. Pollatsek, & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.013.21
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, C., & Tolchinsky, L. (2018). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and semantic orthographic fluency to text quality through elementary school in Catalan. Reading & Writing, 31(2), 293–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9786-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S. (2011). Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing, 28(4), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210378031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutillas, L., & Tolchinsky, L. (2017). Use of adjectives in Catalan: A morphological characterization in different genres and modes of production through school-age development. First Language, 37(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723716673957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egoz-Libshtain, T. (2014). Distribution of Hebrew mental verbs in children’s peer talk [unpublished master’s thesis]. Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, R. P., Lewis, W. E., & Andrews-Weckerly, S. (2009). Do goals affect the structure of students’ argumentative writing strategies? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa, J., Meneses, A., & Chandia, E. (2018). Academic language and the quality of written arguments and explanations of Chilean 8th-graders. Reading & Writing, 31(3), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9806-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glantz, Y. (1989). Mivxan Mem (A test of abstract verbal intelligence). Bar Ilan University. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. (J. Webster, Ed). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. L., Goegan, L. D., Jalbert, R., McManus, K., Sinclair, K., & Spurling, J. (2016). Predictors of spelling and writing skills in first- and second-language learners. Reading & Writing, 29(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9580-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobs, E.-M., & Perrin, D. (Eds). (2014). Handbook of writing and text production. Berlin, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Mercer, S. H., Payan, A., & McGee, W. (2015). Measuring annual growth using written expression curriculum-based measurement: An examination of seasonal and gender differences. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., Al Otaiba, S., Folsom Sidler, J., & Gruelich, L. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first-graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marinellie, S. A., & Kneile, L. A. (2012). Acquiring knowledge of derived nominals and derived adjectives in context. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0053)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, C., Song, L., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Michnick Golinkoff, R., & Lannon, R. (2011). An image is worth a thousand words: Why nouns tend to dominate verbs in early word learning. Developmental Science, 14(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00968.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hallaron, C. L. (2014). Supporting fifth-grade ELLs’ argumentative writing development. Written Communication, 31(3), 304–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314536524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., Graham, S., & Gillespie, A. (2015). The relationship of discourse and topic knowledge to fifth-graders’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2012). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading & Writing, 26(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, T., Favart, M., Beauvais, C., & Beauvais, L. (2009). Children’s cognitive effort and fluency in writing: Effects of genre and of handwriting automatization. Learning & Instruction, 19(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen Van Horne, A. J., & Lin, S. L. (2011). Cognitive state verbs and complement clauses in children with SLI and their typically developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetic, 25(10), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2011.582226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (2006). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Parodi, G. (2007). Reading–writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Accorti Gamannossi, B., & Canneti, L. (2015). Cross-lag analysis of longitudinal associations between primary school students’ writing and reading skills. Reading & Writing, 28(8), 1233–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9569-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravid, D. (2006). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun scale analyses. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 791–821. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravid, D., Bar-On, A., Levie, R., & Douani, O. (2016). Hebrew adjective lexicons in developmental perspective. The Mental Lexicon, 11(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.3.04rav
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2009). Developing linguistic register across text types: The case of Modern Hebrew. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(1), 108–145. https://doi.org/10.107/p&c.17.1.04rav
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravid, D., & Cahana-Amitay, D. (2005). Verbal and nominal expressions in narrating conflict situations in Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravid, D., & Levie, R. (2010). Hebrew adjectives in later language text production. First Language, 30(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709350529
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, D., & Shalom, T. (2012). Standards of evaluation of writing in the seventh grade. Report submitted to Keren Yad Hanadiv, Israel. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., & Keah, J. (2007). Formal distinctiveness of high- and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210709336988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saban-Bezalel, R. (1999). Development of syntactic and metasyntactic abilities in kindergarten and school-age children [unpublished Master’s thesis]. Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Seroussi, B. (2011). The morphology-semantics interface in the mental lexicon: The case of Hebrew [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University.
   Google Scholar
• Seroussi, B. (2018). Later morpho-lexical acquisition. In A. Bar-On, & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical and applied linguistic perspectives (pp. 219–234). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Shany, M., Bahat, A., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., & Zeiger, T. (2006). “Aleph-Taph”: An assessment system for reading and writing disabilities. Yesod.[in Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Smolkin, L. B., Mctigue, E. M., Donovan, C. A., & Coleman, J. M. (2008). Explanation in science trade books recommended for use with elementary students. Science Education, 93(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavans, A., Seroussi, B., & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, S. (2019). Literacy-related abilities’ effects on argumentative text quality structure. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1086296X19859515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., & Koch, J. (2014). Integrating literacy and science for English language learners: From learning-to read to reading-to-learn. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(5), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.833072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uccelli, P., Barr, C. D., Dobbs, C. L., Phillips Galloway, E., Meneses, A., & Sanchez, E. (2015). Core Academic Language Skills (CALS): An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in per-adolescent and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(5), 1077–1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641400006X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar